I type too much, not that great at
English.
Debating mind too on pros cons.
Thought being boat whys of 20+ years you might appreciate note points too.
Generally older boat designs. They load displacement efficiently. Thus their loaded average knots is well.
Modern cruisers that really remind me of old junks; vertical plane bow flared to slice wave and mated to a horizontal aft plane to get up and go, box shape ratio of drag wet area increases faster than a wedge because a box shape is displacing whereas a wedge shape from built in keel type is broadening. Plus need to bolt on keel doesn't appeal to me because first keel boat I helmed I ripped the ship out of the
keel bolts running aground.* Darn short cuts lol.
Junks were using very strong easy to use beating sails thus none tiresome fast running up stormy nights or strong constant uphill pulls if loaded. Downhill racers too if going that way. But that takes a lot of skill with a
sloop, or a walk uphill. Tiring when wanting to stay awake.
Encapsulated keel will load better because of reduced increase of wet area when laden with
food and
water and is far superior as a motorboat if required to ironside because natural boat is a wrighting boat.
Volume;displacement;size of boat can be increased without decrement effect unless racing and wanting acceleration.
In rough; momentum is pretty decent counter to lesser need of acceleration.
Velocity acceleration of our 3d realm, eg
pitch, yaw, rotation is very adequate with high heel. Only downside is Leeward when wind up and knots are on. Downhill less so depending on how loaded vessel is; months away, world
health organisation cares. WHO. Lol.
I got problems too bro. Just trying to read up on
insurance.*
Work shut today because weather wild and port underwater. I'm going swimming,* weather warm yet wild.
Boats I look at for
safety and speed balancing are often labelled full keel but they ain't. They are long keel.* Slightly inferior to full keel for expedition but long enough to roll
water, debris,* run aground and carry a flock tonne of stow without big loss to
hull speed.
Short trips,* less laden, she'd go alright. More weight than a race boat, probably wouldn't sit far on plane,hit the brakes and send
mast deck 4 foot under but trucks don't behave like go-karts.
Good friend suggested if in tropical
lagoon and
school of black tip reef shark swim in. Stay still and don't worry when they rub against.* They inquisitive.* But sudden move and they'll bite you. Maybe ask about that. Idk.
I wear wool. Warm when wet provided wind shielded. Eg under closed jacket. If water gets cold and you go swimming,* you won't dry but you'll warm quicker. Wool is marvellous.* Invented by sheep.
Anyhow... you help remind me of my past
skipper; pro
fishing boat; arguments of sail versus stink, keel versus keelson, loading limits and she's below the gunnels.
We all have different abilities.
12 tonne at 43 feet on sloped encapsulated looks good to me. If weight goes up she'll need to be lengthened, beamed or keel filled.
10 tonne at 36 foot also looks good to me. Fuller keel. Speed ain't the keel, that'd be there to accept load. Speed more so displacement length creating wave frequencies. Over that is semi planing knots. But if we are loaded than force to make is exponential like everything natural.eg heaps. Eg costs lots more.
Cruising, stuff that. Low cost is king. Hulls like that suit some plus hold crown shank
rode from being acceleration with a lot of gentleness instead.