There really are good reasons that the standards are written they way they are. One of the requirements that generates no end of argument here and other places, is the general prohibition against soldering
electrical connections (with a few exceptions). Here is one example showing WHY the standards are written this way. It also shows how little we can trust people who should know better to get things right.
This is on a customer's
boat. The
engine is a 4 Cylinder
Yanmar with the isolated ground option installed. This consists of a two relays, and some
wiring that disconnect the
battery negative from the
engine block except when it is needed. This option was, as far as I know, installed at the factory or as part of the initial engine
installation at the
boat builder.
The boat has recently struggled with intermittent difficulty of engine starting, and stopping, indicating that there were issues in the ground system. Much time and effort (and money) was put into diagnosing this before the boat was brought to me. The primary ground relay had been replaced, which seemed to fix the issues with starting, but now the engine would not stop using the
electrical system at all, and had to be manually shut down at the injection
pump.
Another hour of troubleshooting, and I found the problem hidden under some heat shrink tubing. The wires that carry +12 Volts to the coil of the ground relay had been crimped and then also soldered into the ring terminal. One wire had completely fractured at the end of the hard solder joint, and the other had only one or two strands of the wire left hanging on. Not surprising at all that there had been hard to diagnose, intermittent problems.
Now, there is a bunch not to like about this assembly as supplied by
Yanmar. The wire is NOT proper boat wire, lacking the higher strand count needed for good flexibility. It might pass the specification, but just barely. Putting multiple wires in one terminal is not great, but probably isn't terrible. The terminal does look to be properly sized. The crimp itself is crap. It looks like it was just mashed together with flat jaw pliers instead of a proper crimping die. But, even though they aren't good, none of these things failed.
All of those things are, at best, sub-optimal, but the
single proximate cause for this failure is the solder joint, and resulting lack of strain relief. This forced all of the engine vibration related movement of this wire to focus on this one point, resulting in metal fatigue and failure. Both wires failed RIGHT at the end of the solder joint. The solder joint itself appears to be well done. It is not a cold joint or otherwise deficient, as far as I can see. The amount of solder looks appropriate, and there is not excess wicking up the wire. It was under thin-walled heat shrink, so had at least a little strain relief, but clearly not enough.
Now, I get that this is an extreme case with wires attached to a part bolted to a running engine. This does have more movement stress than most wires will ever see. But this is not the first time I have tracked down
electrical problems on engines to fractured solder joints. It shows that this failure mode DOES happen, exactly as the standard writers would have us avoid. I am sure an argument could be made that solder is fine for joints that are not subject to "too much" movement, but how much, exactly, is "too much"?
I'll point out that all this mess was with factory original
parts. There is no excuse for it. Such stupid and avoidable quality problems have long since been wrung out of the automobile industry (mostly). It's about time that
marine engine suppliers learn the same lessons.
The second
photo is how the part was reinstalled. Separate terminals, quality crimps, made with the right tool, and quality, heavy-wall heat shrink.