Quote:
Originally Posted by daveNZ
Apologies, silly question, the answer to my first question would be the often mentioned 80% (approx).
|
Not silly at all and the 80% number bantered around is very often misleading or simply incorrect for your system because it all depends on how much
current you have as to when in the SOC curve you will hit absorption voltage as well as how healthy your batteries are.
I regularly see AGM batteries that have been abused come up to absorption voltage very quickly from an SOC below 50% even with just a .15C +/- charge rate. This is because they are heavily sulfated. The somewhat used battery in the graph in this thread took 1:42 minutes to exit bulk at a .2C charge rate from 50% SOC... A .2C charge rate is pretty low for an AGM but I usually see less than this so most folks are not truly taking advantage of the AGM's acceptance rates as effectively as they could. Bulk charging is very, very efficient, pretty darn close to 98-99%, so the longer your batteries can stay in bulk the faster you can charge them.
I would suggest reading the
May 2015 issue of Practical Sailor for more insight on how quickly one can abuse an AGM battery if you are PSOC (partial state of charge) cycling them. It also highlights how different brands of AGM's handle a PSOC
environment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveNZ
I'll rephrase the second part as well:
In a 200AH bank does higher charge efficiency of AGM lead to reduced Bulk or Absorption charging time; it should in theory but does it translate to actual experience on the water? (assuming best voltages etc)
|
Yes it can translate and charge faster but you need to be able to take advantage of it and
keep the batteries healthy in order for the charge faster benefit to be worth the added expense over the long haul.