Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-11-2020, 01:20   #1
er9
cruiser

Join Date: Sep 2014
Boat: 1980 (Canning) Mariner36
Posts: 834
300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

Was just wondering under what circumstances would a medium size sailboat need a 350 AMP 1,2,B Battery switch vs a 300 AMP switch.

Blue Sea has an 'm' and 'e' line of switches the 'e' line being able to handle 350 AMPS vs 300 for the 'm' line.

it appears the 'e' line of switched handles larger cranking amps so is it just to accommodate a humongous battery bank or alternator delivering huge loads to a larger engine or larger distribution panel (lots of devices running) or mainly a little added over protection?

The 'm' series switches are nice because they have a mini version of the switch.
er9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 03:02   #2
Moderator
 
noelex 77's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 14,678
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

There is not much practical difference in the ratings between the Blue series e and m series battery switches. Blue Seas rate them at 350/600/1200 A and 300/500/900 A (continuous/ intermittent/ cranking).

Some larger boats need even bigger battery switches. The HD series is sometimes needed with a 600/900/1700 rating. Typical high current devices are engine starting, inverters, bow thrusters, anchor windlasses etc.

It is important to check that the equipment fitted is within specification. Marine electrical systems are becoming sophisticated and some boats are pushing the limits of what can be achieved, especially on 12v.
noelex 77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 05:24   #3
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,431
Images: 241
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

Quote:
Originally Posted by noelex 77 View Post
... The HD series is sometimes needed with a 600/900/1700 rating...
And, are available with Alternator Field Disconnect (I don't believe the e nor m are).
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 05:55   #4
Moderator
 
noelex 77's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 14,678
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

Quote:
Originally Posted by GordMay View Post
And, are available with Alternator Field Disconnect (I don't believe the e nor m are).
The e series has a large range of options including dual pole models. Some of the models do have alternator field disconnect.

I don’t think the m series has an alternator field disconnect option in the range, presumably because Blue Seas envisioned this range to more commonly used on smaller outboard powered boats.
noelex 77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 11:45   #5
Registered User
 
Cadence's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SC
Boat: None,build the one shown of glass, had many from 6' to 48'.
Posts: 10,208
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

Quote:
Originally Posted by er9 View Post
Was just wondering under what circumstances would a medium size sailboat need a 350 AMP 1,2,B Battery switch vs a 300 AMP switch.

Blue Sea has an 'm' and 'e' line of switches the 'e' line being able to handle 350 AMPS vs 300 for the 'm' line.

it appears the 'e' line of switched handles larger cranking amps so is it just to accommodate a humongous battery bank or alternator delivering huge loads to a larger engine or larger distribution panel (lots of devices running) or mainly a little added over protection?

The 'm' series switches are nice because they have a mini version of the switch.
With a 36' boat I would guess your starter amperage wouldn't be a problem with the 300. Chances are you would be paralleling the house and starter battery any way while not attempting to start an the same time.
Cadence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2020, 09:44   #6
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 4,662
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

If all the battery and engine cables are really big. The small Switch is harder to make them all fit.
smac999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2020, 11:29   #7
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Panama
Boat: Norseman 447
Posts: 1,628
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

But note that the "rated current" maximum value is ONLY if you use 4/0 wire. They don’t say what the rating is if you use "smaller" wires. It appears that they are counting on the wires to help dissipate heat generated in the switch. Thus I wouldn’t push them too hard.
Bycrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2020, 12:31   #8
er9
cruiser

Join Date: Sep 2014
Boat: 1980 (Canning) Mariner36
Posts: 834
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

interesting, thanks for the replies. I think im going to go with the 'e' series switches. from researching a bit more on Blue Sea's website it seems they were designed around larger inboard diesels. the 'm' series smaller outboard as Noelex pointed out.
er9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2020, 19:59   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 4,662
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bycrick View Post
But note that the "rated current" maximum value is ONLY if you use 4/0 wire. They don’t say what the rating is if you use "smaller" wires. It appears that they are counting on the wires to help dissipate heat generated in the switch. Thus I wouldn’t push them too hard.
well marine 2/0 wire is rated at 280a in an engine room so yes that makes sense that it requires 4/0 for 350a
smac999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2020, 05:33   #10
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Panama
Boat: Norseman 447
Posts: 1,628
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

I didn’t mean to imply that the 4/0 requirement wasn’t entirely reasonable. I think it is. My point was that one should read ALL the specifications and hopefully understand what they mean. For example, a 100 amp fuse isn’t rated at 100 amps in an engine room at 130*.
Bycrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2020, 06:11   #11
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,000
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

I use the mini 300A switches for battery disconnects of inverter/chargers.

You can simply look at the fuse (cable) you use: up to 300A fuse the small switch is good to go. I use the 500A remote battery switch at the battery bank which has a 400A fuse and 4/0 cable.
__________________
“It’s a trap!” - Admiral Ackbar.

s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2020, 07:46   #12
er9
cruiser

Join Date: Sep 2014
Boat: 1980 (Canning) Mariner36
Posts: 834
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
I use the mini 300A switches for battery disconnects of inverter/chargers.

You can simply look at the fuse (cable) you use: up to 300A fuse the small switch is good to go. I use the 500A remote battery switch at the battery bank which has a 400A fuse and 4/0 cable.
wowzers! i got a look at a piece of 4/0 cable yesterday for the first time. it looked like a piece of pipe. wouldn't want to have to make a radius of under 4' with that stuff, never mind crimping it.
er9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2020, 08:57   #13
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Panama
Boat: Norseman 447
Posts: 1,628
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

I think some of your fuse values are too high.

You often hear the rule-of-thumb "Fuse for the wire size, not the load." However, that’s technically true only for the maximum fuse size. In another thread, Gord posted a great study that examined the resistance of butt connectors in #14 wire. One of the interesting points was how hot some of them got when the circuit current was well within the maximum that the wire was rated for. And that was for "tiny" wire by comparison.

So my practice is to fuse for the expected load, considering the time-duration of the load, realizing that most fuses will carry 130-150% of their rating for many minutes and maybe 200% for tens of seconds.

My example, the starter fuse on 3-4 cylinder Yanmar engines. Measured starter load was about 240 amps at normal cranking. They’re fused at 175 amps and we’ve never blown a fuse.
Bycrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2020, 09:33   #14
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,000
Re: 300 AMP vs 350 AMP 1,2,B Switch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bycrick View Post
I think some of your fuse values are too high.

You often hear the rule-of-thumb "Fuse for the wire size, not the load." However, that’s technically true only for the maximum fuse size. In another thread, Gord posted a great study that examined the resistance of butt connectors in #14 wire. One of the interesting points was how hot some of them got when the circuit current was well within the maximum that the wire was rated for. And that was for "tiny" wire by comparison.

So my practice is to fuse for the expected load, considering the time-duration of the load, realizing that most fuses will carry 130-150% of their rating for many minutes and maybe 200% for tens of seconds.

My example, the starter fuse on 3-4 cylinder Yanmar engines. Measured starter load was about 240 amps at normal cranking. They’re fused at 175 amps and we’ve never blown a fuse.
The ampacity of a cable is for continuous use but make sure to check the cable specs, especially temperature rating. I always use 105 deg. C rated but cheap wire can come as low as 60 deg C. which about halves the ampacity iirc. Also, account for de-rating, like when you bundle cables or when used in an engine room etc. I often encounter cabling that does not have enough capacity.

Here is how to do it: take the continuous current from what you connect. Multiply that by 1.25 then look up the ampacity to determine cable size, going to the next bigger gauge after de-rating. Example: 100A, no de-rating needed so minimum gauge is the one that has an ampacity of 100A so that would be 6AWG at 120A. The correct fuse is the corrected ampacity rating so in this case 120A or the next lower value. If that lower value is too low for the load, you need to go for a bigger gauge and do the math again.

Now comes the actual decision: how long is the cable run and how much voltage drop is acceptable? Let’s say the distance is 15’ x 2 (pos + neg cable) = 30’ and we accept 10% voltage drop at 12V... the table shows that you need a minimum of 4 gauge wire instead of 6 gauge.

Now the actual circuit is 4 gauge wire with a 100-120A fuse but when that fuse size does not exist, you can expand the allowable range to 100-160A because the 4 gauge can take 160A max.

Normal startup currents etc. will be absorbed by the cable and the fuse without causing problems.

As shown in this example, most circuits have larger diameter wire than the ampacity rating because the need for limiting voltage drop.
__________________
“It’s a trap!” - Admiral Ackbar.

s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:39.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.