 |
|
14-09-2018, 14:17
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 293
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
What is the reasoning in Lagoon moving their mast aft? There must be a benefit, but I always thought that in sailing, it's better to pull the boat rather than push it through the water.
|
|
|
14-09-2018, 14:47
|
#32
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2016
Boat: Pogo 10,50
Posts: 189
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
The pics do seem distorted
|
|
|
14-09-2018, 15:25
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 29
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssmoot
Maybe the aspect ratio on the layout images is just stretched, but they make the boat look incredibly porky?
Maybe it's my imagination, but I don't think I've seen another cruising catamaran with as wide hulls to length/beam. But maybe all that extra width is above the waterline? It does seem to flare out quite a bit under the... bridge deck? Salon sole? I'm not sure what the correct term is. I guess while I'm at it, is there a specific term for hull width on a catamaran or is it just "hull beam"?
Any thoughts?
Really nice hull interiors though. And happy to see the large forward salon vents/pass-throughs becoming a standard feature on most new boats.
|
Images are distorted, hull specs are almost identical to the 450 (length, beam and draft)
1.5 tons heavier
|
|
|
15-09-2018, 06:09
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Geelong
Boat: Lagoon 440
Posts: 22
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
This model is 1 foot longer than my 440 and 4 tonnes heavier, yes it’s nice but my 440 is more functional and I just don’t get the big holes in the rear roof to get to the flybridge, make the rear cockpit wet for no real benefit
|
|
|
15-09-2018, 07:32
|
#35
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Boat: Lagoon 440
Posts: 736
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by ANJOKA
Images are distorted, hull specs are almost identical to the 450 (length, beam and draft)
1.5 tons heavier 
|
Nope, the L46(F) is actually slightly bigger and slightly lighter than the L450F (You probably compared it to the L450S).
Edit; L46 also has more sail area than L450F (140 vs 129).
|
|
|
15-09-2018, 11:38
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: To be decided...
Boat: Lagoon 450S
Posts: 502
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey hellman
This model is 1 foot longer than my 440 and 4 tonnes heavier, yes it’s nice but my 440 is more functional and I just don’t get the big holes in the rear roof to get to the flybridge, make the rear cockpit wet for no real benefit
|
This is one of the main benefits for buying the S over the F. If it's raining, our whole cockpit stays nice and dry.
There's a ton of other benefits but I don't want to stir too much. OK then, faster, lighter, more protected helm, lower boom, more social under sail.... i could go on
|
|
|
15-09-2018, 11:48
|
#37
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 29
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by rom
Nope, the L46(F) is actually slightly bigger and slightly lighter than the L450F (You probably compared it to the L450S).
Edit; L46 also has more sail area than L450F (140 vs 129).
|
Maybe I’m wrong. This is what I saw
|
|
|
16-09-2018, 08:43
|
#38
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Boat: Lagoon 440
Posts: 736
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by ANJOKA
Maybe I’m wrong. This is what I saw
|
Yes, as I said you are comparing a L46 (Flybridge) to a L450S (Sportop, no flybridge). That is not fair. You should compare the L46 to the L450F which is 16.9t.
|
|
|
16-09-2018, 10:10
|
#39
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 29
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by rom
Yes, as I said you are comparing a L46 (Flybridge) to a L450S (Sportop, no flybridge). That is not fair. You should compare the L46 to the L450F which is 16.9t.
|
Sorry again I did not realize that!
Cheers!
|
|
|
16-09-2018, 10:18
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Discovery Bay, CA
Posts: 1,141
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thalas
What is the reasoning in Lagoon moving their mast aft? There must be a benefit, .
|
Probably has something to do with having a "stripper pole" in the middle of the saloon. I could see the benefit of that!
__________________
"Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore"- Andre' Gide
|
|
|
16-09-2018, 10:36
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Boat: Lagoon 400S2
Posts: 3,046
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saleen411
Probably has something to do with having a "stripper pole" in the middle of the saloon. I could see the benefit of that! 
|
It is a sacrifice to introduce a self tacking jib instead of the genoa. I prefer the old design.
Square stripper poles are kind of odd, aren't they...
|
|
|
16-09-2018, 11:44
|
#42
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: To be decided...
Boat: Lagoon 450S
Posts: 502
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
The amount of miles we have done under genoa alone is incredible. A self tacking jib would be a huge downside for me.
|
|
|
16-09-2018, 14:21
|
#43
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Auckland
Boat: Outremer 55L
Posts: 2,107
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
My understanding is that fore triangles are getting larger (by moving the mast aft) and mainsails smaller for exactly the reason Dave sites - furling headsails are easier to reef than a mainsail and more effective downwind without chafing on the rig. An extreme example is the mastfoil rig on Chris White designs.
Regarding self tacking jibs, with a larger fore triangle their size is larger than the more traditional fractional rig self tacker with large mainsail and small jib. Smaller than a genoa sure, but the smaller size and self tacking are a great convenience upwind in trade winds. Downwind run a gennaker or Code sail if the self tacker is too small. As their website states, this is exactly what racing boats are doing for reaching and running racing.
The square pole is of course the mast support. I notice they really try to blend it in with the reflective SS to visually minimise it. How about instead turn it into an art installation with vinyl wrap, or put a hanging garden on it. It’s really not that bad and the salon is very open despite it.
|
|
|
17-09-2018, 00:44
|
#44
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Boat: Lagoon 400S2
Posts: 3,046
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
It is an odd design, and I personaly do not like it.
But it is not that important for me anyway, I chose the 400S2 with the old rigging, mast upfront in the salon and not in the way in the entrance with bigger main and genova + code zero on the bowsprit. Much better and more spatious than the new Lagoon 40.
I wonder, why the main cat manufacturer are so reluctant to introduce inmast furling for the main, especially when they minimize the main sail size by moving the mast back.
The Amel and other seaworthy monohulls show, it is a mature technology.
|
|
|
17-09-2018, 01:58
|
#45
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Boat: Lagoon 400S2
Posts: 3,046
|
Re: New Lagoon 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by ANJOKA
Maybe I’m wrong. This is what I saw
|
I wonder, how bigger m2 area translates into smaller sq ft area regarding main sail options. Must be an odd imperial thing.
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|