Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 17-05-2025, 06:49   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2025
Location: Gloucester
Boat: 50' Cutter
Posts: 7
Starlink for offshore passages

Has anyone used Starlink along with Predictwind Iridium Go exec for offshore passages and is it necessary to have both?
PhilipS JR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 07:24   #2
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: On the boat, currently in north Florida
Boat: Wharram Tiki 38
Posts: 188
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

I've used starlink offshore and access Predict Wind through my laptop and tablet/phone. You wouldn't need both.

Iridium is very slow and is also a very expensive option if you want an alternative emergency system. The Garmin In Reach gives all the emergency contact capability a lot cheaper. You can also access written weather forecasts on the Garmin.
Mexican Hat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 07:36   #3
Registered User
 
Networker's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Boat: Fountaine Pajot Helia 44
Posts: 273
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

I use both, Starlink doesn't always work on the high seas and you can't take Starlink in your life raft and call for help.
Networker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 07:55   #4
Registered User
 
bergius's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Home port Berlin, now at sea
Boat: Amigo 40, 31ft double ender
Posts: 252
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

We don't have Iridium, but have used Starlink (v2 dishy with Roam Unlimited plan) for multiple offshore passages including an Atlantic crossing. It works if you enable Priority Data before leaving.

However, the rules may change at any point leaving you without internet. There are many rules that ban the way most cruisers use it, like the whole being able to use it only for couple months per year out of your home country thing. These are not enforced right now - usually - but who knows when that changes.

Because of this we have a Garmin Inreach as a fallback device, and will likely install SSB before next passage. We also carry the Inreach on hikes.

Iridium Go Exec is nice in the sense that it doesn't use as much electricity, and it works without constant weird ToS changes. However, it is both slow and expensive. But I see there's now an unlimited plan at least.
__________________
Lille Ø - Follow our adventures as we explore the coasts of the Baltic Sea and beyond!
bergius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 10:33   #5
Registered User

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,832
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

I also have found Starlink to be incredibly reliable at sea using the $2/GB priority data when more than 12 miles from shore (Roam Unlimited Plan). I used to have a Iridium Go and Starlink is MUCH more reliable in bad weather.

There have been no changes to the Roam Unlimited plan for over two years. While there are constant rumors of change there is no sign that anything is gong to happen soon. And if the plan changes it is always possible to switch to a new plan even at sea.

The one restriction with Roam Unlimited is that it can not be used for more than 60 days in a country where the government has refused to grant Starlink a license to operate (like Grenada). Without a license it is technically illegal to use Starlink or even have the dish aboard (although there are no reports of cruisers having their dishes seized). In many cases this is happening because politically powerful people own the local cell phone company and don't want Starlink cutting into their profits. In countries that have granted a license (Bahamas, EU, Mexico etc) there is no 60 day time limit. You can see which countries are "available" on the map on the Starlink web site.

I also carry a Garmin Inreach as any piece of hardware can fail (although the Starlink dish is incredibly rugged. I've never heard of one failing for water intrusion unless it was dropped over the side. The Inreach is much cheaper than Iridium GO both to buy and on a monthly basis. It connects more reliably. It has a four day battery and can go in a liferaft.
CarlF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 10:42   #6
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2015
Boat: R&C Leopard 40
Posts: 1,093
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

We carry two Starlink Minis. One active and one spare. Garmin Explorer+ as our backup. To me this is an optimal setup. The price for two Minis in Central America was the same as I paid for the Garmin Explorer+ 6 years ago.
__________________
-Chris
Visit our BLOG www.squidandjellysgreatadventure.com
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 11:56   #7
Registered User
 
bergius's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Home port Berlin, now at sea
Boat: Amigo 40, 31ft double ender
Posts: 252
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlF View Post
The one restriction with Roam Unlimited is that it can not be used for more than 60 days in a country where the government has refused to grant Starlink a license to operate (like Grenada).
Yes, that seems to be the way the rules are currently enforced. However, it is not how the rules are actually written. Here's what the actual rules for Roam say:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starlink.com
International travel is allowed in available markets for up to 2 months per trip.

Coastal ocean coverage (up to 12 nautical miles off the coast) is provided by Starlink with active coverage around the world for up to 5 consecutive days at a time and a total of 60 days over the course of a one-year period.
Hence, I wouldn't rely on the "relaxed attitude" prevailing forever.
bergius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 12:12   #8
Registered User
 
Windpilot's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Cailifornia
Boat: 1999 Hunter 410
Posts: 212
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

Real Simply, I do use both. iridium go exec is always running my PW tracking only, starlink gets plugged in when I need the internet.

Iridium is for me, sat phone, very portable with long lasting battery, back up whatsapp communication and 247 tracking.

Starlink for PW forecasts and everything internet related, only on when needed, usually daytime with sun out for obvious reasons.
Windpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 14:34   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 359
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

We just finished 4,500 miles crossing the Atlantic from South Africa and Starlink worked flawlessly. We have the flat panel high performance.

We also have a Mini as a back up that we can actually bring on the life raft and can be powered by battery with a USB-C. I see no need for an Iridium Go these days.
ol1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2025, 15:14   #10
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between the devil and the deep blue sea
Boat: a sailing boat
Posts: 21,759
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

one source is great


two sources do not hurt if you can afford them


I found Starlink unreliable on many boats smaller boats (below 50 ft generally) in heavy seas.


Perhaps Iridium Go is less directional or something. It is slower for sure, but more it is the more stable of the two when the sea is very lumby and the boat is anything but a proper yacht.


barnakiel
barnakiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2025, 08:50   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2017
Boat: IP 44
Posts: 372
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

We just completed the Baja Bash with Starlink. Worked great in pretty lumpy seas the whole time. I did figure out how to turn on Priority Data even after being cut off because of being too far from shore. Unfortunately, I didn't take screen shots and it is appropriately un-intuitive. But on the phone app you start by clicking on the warning box that pops up in the app telling you your in an "unexpected location". From there you work your way to your account and can switch on the Priority Data. Two GB goes fast!
CrispyCringle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2025, 05:20   #12
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Virginia, USA
Boat: Hunter 340
Posts: 1,588
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

Go Exec is very expensive and very slow compared to Starlink. You may wish to have a satphone as an emergency backup to starlink (something I would recommend) but you can get a low minute plan and just never use it except in an emergency.
Statistical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2025, 06:24   #13
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 855
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

Starlink will dump 6,000 tons of burned up satellite debris into the very fragile (opinion, backed by fact) upper atmosphere every year. Is that the legacy you want in order to stay online?
PippaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2025, 06:35   #14
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between the devil and the deep blue sea
Boat: a sailing boat
Posts: 21,759
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

Amazon is shooting up their already too. And China has a parallel project running.


Those constellation expected to be publicly available round 2027-2032.


They say competition is a good thing in technology and business.


barnakiel
barnakiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2025, 06:56   #15
Registered User

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,832
Re: Starlink for offshore passages

I also carry a spare Starlink. Other than the initial $400 payment for the dish it's been paused on Roam Unlimited for over two years so $0 running cost (I turn it on once a year to let it update it's software but don't unpause the account).

So this is much cheaper than keeping an Iridium available as a backup.

I also think that Starlink network with over 5000 satelites is likely far more reliable than the 75 Iridium statelite network. This is especialy true as the owner, Irdium Communications (who took over when the origional Iridium went bankrupt) is unprofitable and its stock is close to a 10 year low. There's real doubt about its long term survival.

The Starlink design using phased array dishes is also better adapted to reception in rough seas and bad weather than the Iridium design. Typically a Starlink dish has five or more satelites "in view" that it is constantly switching between (using electronically steered radios rather than moving the dish).

I do carry a Garmin Inreach too - but that is really for abandon ship situations rather than distress communications when onboard.
CarlF is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
offshore, passage

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cheoy Lee Clipper 42 - Offshore Passages - Feedback Anyone ? ChrisClipper Monohull Sailboats 13 27-03-2024 12:40
Using routing software for long offshore passages Tommo Navigation 17 03-01-2017 14:15
Should swim platform be removed for longer offshore passages? ErBrown Construction, Maintenance & Refit 14 15-06-2016 19:32
PDQ 36 for offshore passages? Budawang Multihull Sailboats 31 13-11-2014 04:43
Brisbane offshore passages ntonnelier Sailor Logs & Cruising Plans 4 27-11-2013 08:50



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 16:02.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.