Cruisers Forum

  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 19-11-2015, 04:01   #16
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: KA4WJA - Iridium question...

Originally Posted by ka4wja View Post
And, I'm wondering if this is where his recommendation comes into play??? As this instance / use at very high latitudes, is where handoffs can become more critical...
Could be. He was semi-specialized in comms for boats going to the Antarctic.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2015, 10:53   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Boat: Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
Posts: 284
Re: KA4WJA - Iridium question...

Originally Posted by estarzinger View Post
I primarily heard this from johnathan selby - the guy who wrote weatherfax2000 and skyeye. As I said, I have no idea of its validity, but Johnathan is a damn bright and practical guy.
I can tell you why this is. John correctly points out that the satellites shut down beams near the poles, because you have total saturation with a smaller number of beams, and too many causes handover chaos or interference.

OTOH, at the equator the satellites are at their maximum spread. In theory - in ideal conditions and if the satellites are all correctly placed - you should have continuous coverage. In reality, inside the tropics there is a potential for occasional coverage holes to open up. Those can be caused by weather interference, and also slight drift in the orbits of the satellites creating gaps. The usual failure is a handover failure when going from satellite to satellite. I would guess that the best guaranteed way to make a call would be to know when you get to the leading spot beam of a satellite and try to complete the entire call in the 10 minutes or so the satellite is overhead (handing you off from spot beam to spot beam). That's what the prediction software will give you. As an aside, my friends using the Go for GRIBs in this years Transpac had little/no trouble with connection drops.

That said, most of the connection software does a great job at picking up where it left off. XGate is a great example. I think that's what PredictWind uses. Their latest app is wonderfully simple to use and set up and IMO is a perfect solution for a non-technical sailor wanting GRIBs.

Evans, I think your point about the cable and connectors is also spot on. Back to the OP, he'd get much more gain ensuring good quality and corrosion free connectors and cable to an omni external antenna than I think he would ever gain from a beam antenna.
gjorgensen is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: Iridium 9505a and Iridium 9555 sat phones Renewal Classifieds Archive 2 26-08-2013 18:10
Iridium 9555, Iridium Extreme or IsatPhone Pro? svseachange Marine Electronics 10 23-03-2013 08:02
Iridium Phone - ISatPhone Pro VS Iridium Extreme Fauvel Navigation 1 24-12-2011 10:47

Advertise Here

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.