Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrus Safdari
As I understand it of course once the radar identifies a target then it makes no real distinctions however the selling point of active reflectors is
1- it presents a much better signal than the current passive reflectors
thus making you more likely to be seen
Is this still the case?
2- *Apart from what the ships radar picks up* (or not) the active blip was supposedly more likely to *get the attention of the ships operators* by making you "look like a tanker" due to the much better signal.
Is this still the case?
|
I don't believe it is the case.
A radar
screen contains spatial information so a strong return from a
single pulse can really only be indicated by
single dot unless you want to skew the spatial information on the
screen. Different colors however, are used to represent the strength of the signal. Additionally, there are other means to tell the size of the object (apart from
AIS, doppler shift, etc)
For instance, lets say a
boat 35 feet long is perpendicular to you, 1 mile out. If your pulse repetition frequency is quick enough, it will
paint that
boat multiple times as the radar sweeps across it.
For instance, take a CHIRP radar with a rotation rate of 24
RPM with a minimum PRF of 1200Hz. This means that a pulse will be sent out every 24*360/60/1200 = .12 degrees. An
arc length of 35 feet (the boat length) at 1 mile forms a .38 degree angle to the radar transmitter. This means the boat will be painted exactly 3-4 times with every pass. Therefore the radar should show 3-4 blips if all of the reflections were detected.
Conversely, a 900 foot tanker running perpendicular to you at 1 mile will get painted 80+ times showing a line 20 times longer.
I am ignoring the fact that modern solid state radars don't use narrow pulses with scalar returns and they routinely have higher PRFs than 1200. They use wide pulses with swept frequencies providing even more resolution information.