Cruisers Forum

Join CruisersForum Today

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 26-12-2018, 20:14   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1
Modified Easy 11.6

WARNING about contracts to purchase a vessel from private sellers, and maybe even some brokers !

So we found a boat we really loved after a lot of searching and a couple of unsuccessful offers on very similar vessels. Which is an expensive process in itself, as you will know if have, or you are out there looking.

We agreed a price on a ‘Modified’ Peter Snell Easy 11.6 Catamaran afloat in northern Brisbane area (Queensland Australia)... we then Paid our deposit of 10,000 dollars just so we could conduct a TEST SAIL (very standard procedure here in OZ &#128532

After the ‘test sail’ we withdrew from the sale and the owner-builders of the boat deducted from the deposit $547.50 or 0.25% of the sale price for the privilege of sailing their boat for three or so hours for the sole purpose of evaluating the vessel before completing the purchase agreement.

We discussed the clause beforehand (verbally) and were told by the sellers it was meant to cover ‘expenses and outgoings’ should we withdraw after they took the boat off the market and went to a lot of trouble to accomodate our requirements of a sail test and a detailed out of water pre-purchase survey.

Because of the time of year, scheduling a survey post the sail test could not happen until mid January after our appointed surveyor returned from Christmas holidays, so we agreed the clause in good faith.

We agreed and paid the deposit on the Monday night. Signed the contract Tuesday afternoon, test sailed on the Thursday and withdrew by email and phone on the Friday morning. At no time over those approximate 4.5 days did their advertisements for the vessel mention that the boat was sold or off the market.

No breakdown of expenses and outgoings has been forthcoming despite a written request. 😡

We hired a highly experienced sailing catamaran consultant who came for the sail test with Sellers approval. We have monohull experience but limited catamaran exposure.

Later we contacted the designer due to the fact the vessel preformed so poorly under power and sail.

Both parties advised not to purchase this boat as it was their ‘expert’ opinion the owner-builders have strayed way beyond the planed designed weight and have made some grievous changes to the sail rig. Sellers commented the designer had first hand knowledge of his vessel, just that the opinion of the changes made was positive, not negative !

So we strongly feel taking part of our deposit given in good faith is very wrong and not in the spirit of the negotiation or the clause in the contract.

Its not industry standard practise to have that clause and we should never have agreed, but trusted we would be treated fairly should we decline to proceed.

They seamed so nice and reasonable 😱

Sadly the sail test was NOT good to say the least despite perfect conditions on the water.

During the test sail, the port motor would not key start, the helm was not responding correctly due in part to large amounts of hard shell growth below the waterline. The sailing performance was miles away from what is reported by owners of other vessels of this same design and by the designer himself.

We anchored for a quick sandwich and the anchor rode broke, if not for an anchor bridle we would have lost the anchor and chain completely.

Basically, it appears to be incorrectly rigged and heavily constructed beyond the designers plans. Furthermore she is currently poorly maintained and was not ready for a test sail and detailed inspection by perspective buyers.

Sadly the owners are separated and the vessel is a property settlement so the adds reads. Hence their anger the sale fell over maybe?

In an attempt to settle this matter we asked for a reasonable break down of expenses they would like to claim, and offered $40 for the hour or less of fuel consumption (two small outboard motors power the vessel, or 3 litres per hour in total). This offer was rejected stating they had the right to keep the entire 0.25%, namely $547.50 and gave NO breakdown 🙁

So be forewarned, if you are looking at a modified Easy 11.6 that for sale as a property settlement, bloody be carful !!!

Please feel free to copy and paste this to any other perspective buyers... Or as many sites as you can; hopefully no one else has to go though this particular experience me it’s no fun !
Hammo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2018, 04:57   #2
Senior Cruiser
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 38,198
Images: 241
Re: Modified Easy 11.6

Greetings and welcome aboard the CF, Hammo.
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"

GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2019, 23:57   #3
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Mid North Coast NSW
Posts: 3
Re: Modified Easy 11.6

Hey Hammo, that’s excellent advice as we are looking to buy soon and just getting our heads around the process involved. That unfortunate you felt the sting there and appreciate your sharing to us unsuspecting inexperienced boat owner wannabes!
BTW we are looking at an “Easy 37” any chance you could share the boats name as the boat is through a broker and we don’t know any owner details or circumstances?
Hockers is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverters - Pure vs. Modified Sine Wave BubbleHeadMd Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 3 31-03-2010 08:33
Any Sailing Tips for a Modified Junk Rig? TopHat Seamanship & Boat Handling 5 31-03-2010 04:16
Pure Sine Wave vs Modified Inversion unbusted67 Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 19 18-03-2010 17:24

Advertise Here

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.