|
|
30-08-2009, 18:52
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly on the boat. Occasionally at our condo in Port St Lucie, FL.
Boat: Manta 42 Sailcat -Toucan Dream
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnakiel
Hi to all brave PC builders,
- you can buy some great power sources from ambulance manufacturers supplies - you know an ambulance has 12 Volt onboard and computers, so ...
- I agree for all you power assumptions except that you tend to omit the case of an LCD screen - they take 100-150 Watts !!! Beware! and to get an IPX7, preferably touch-sensitive and sunlight viewable ... not easy,
- have a look at the new (laptops?) from Acer named Timeline - they run up to 9 hours on charge, are inexpensive (relatively) so make a nice alternative for those who build upon a lap/net -book.
-----
My big problem here is - in Europe it not all that easy to find an IPX7 and sunlight viewable screen. One can be imported, but at a cost that would make the whole project pointless. A decent LCD for the navstation can be had at some 100 USD. Again, if we include the LCD consumption into the energy needs of the system we end up with 150+ Watts against 70 on a 14 inch laptop, and less in case of a netbook or a nettop + screen.
So my current setup is : 1) an ordinary laptop (400 USD, new), plus 2) a gps in the cockpit, with the laptop used for everything (planning, creating and sending WPTs, piloting, weather) and the gps for navigation, course trim and piloting in heavy weather.
My target system is: 1) a plain netbook (300 USD, new) with an independent 12 inch screen for the nav table, plus 2) a Garmin 620 or alike at helm.
With the new system we want to achieve all what we have now plus:
-less power consumption,
-smaller footprint,
-AIS at helm,
-chart at helm.
I just wish had Garmin priced more reasonably - it is not more than a nice car plotter (OK it is very well marinized) but they ask price twice of what we are used to in cars !!!
b.
|
Dan,
150 watts??? Not for the Argonaut. I don't know how it works maybe some others will understand it better but what I do know is that max power on my boat for the screen and computer is 4 amps or about 48 watts. It is LCD with a difference in technology in that it uses reflected sunlight during the day. Here's a quote from their website:
"Argonaut has built a name for its direct sunlight readable Tflex displays. The unique Tflex optical system reflects bright light back through the screen image making the screen get brighter as ambient sunlight gets brighter. An astounding 2000+ nits can be achieved in direct sun conditions without the use of high power consuming and heat generating backlight assemblies. The result is long term reliability and lower operational costs compared with traditional high brightness sunlight displays."
Expensive but way less than the competition at $3000 for a sunlight visible screen. I have no connection to them other than I know several boating friends that suggested I try it. I did and I'm thrilled with the performance.
Best regards,
Chris
|
|
|
30-08-2009, 19:30
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly on the boat. Occasionally at our condo in Port St Lucie, FL.
Boat: Manta 42 Sailcat -Toucan Dream
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris blair
Dan,
150 watts??? Not for the Argonaut. I don't know how it works maybe some others will understand it better but what I do know is that max power on my boat for the screen and computer is 4 amps or about 48 watts. It is LCD with a difference in technology in that it uses reflected sunlight during the day. Here's a quote from their website:
"Argonaut has built a name for its direct sunlight readable Tflex displays. The unique Tflex optical system reflects bright light back through the screen image making the screen get brighter as ambient sunlight gets brighter. An astounding 2000+ nits can be achieved in direct sun conditions without the use of high power consuming and heat generating backlight assemblies. The result is long term reliability and lower operational costs compared with traditional high brightness sunlight displays."
Expensive but way less than the competition at $3000 for a sunlight visible screen. I have no connection to them other than I know several boating friends that suggested I try it. I did and I'm thrilled with the performance.
Best regards,
Chris
|
Whoops! I meant to send this to B. Sorry Dan.
|
|
|
30-08-2009, 19:48
|
#18
|
Obsfucator, Second Class
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeast USA.
Boat: 1982 Sea Ray SRV360
Posts: 1,745
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris blair
Whoops! I meant to send this to B. Sorry Dan.
|
I am SO offended. I may not speak to you for 5 seconds.
-dan
|
|
|
30-08-2009, 21:43
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly on the boat. Occasionally at our condo in Port St Lucie, FL.
Boat: Manta 42 Sailcat -Toucan Dream
Posts: 82
|
Dan,
That's much more in line with what I'm familiar with. I think the Argonaut is even lower due to it's technology that somehow uses sunlight reflected back from behind the screen. So on a bright day the screen gets brighter without consuming more power.
Thanks.
Regards,
Chris
SV Toucan Dream
|
|
|
30-08-2009, 21:46
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly on the boat. Occasionally at our condo in Port St Lucie, FL.
Boat: Manta 42 Sailcat -Toucan Dream
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dacust
I am SO offended. I may not speak to you for 5 seconds.
-dan
|
Glad you're not easily offended. I'm obviously new here and barely figuring this forum out.
Regards,
Chris
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 09:05
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly on the boat. Occasionally at our condo in Port St Lucie, FL.
Boat: Manta 42 Sailcat -Toucan Dream
Posts: 82
|
Great system with lots of capability. My only constructive comment would be to look at the power consumption. Your baseload is considerable with that processor and the loss from the inverter. If you have a power source that you don't mind using a lot you'll certainly outperform the low power 12v systems with Intel Atom processor. There's no right or wrong here. It's just good the know the consequences. I have 600 amp hour house batteries, 515 watts of solar power, and 5.5 KW diesel genset. Yet I still prefer the lower power on the nav/sound system so I can run the water maker with most of my solar power and not run the genset unless we need A/C. But we spend a lot of time in remote areas of the Keys and Bahamas. So what works for us isn't for everybody.
Best regards,
Chris
SV Toucan Dream
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 09:46
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Shelter Island, California
Boat: Stevens 47 Komaru
Posts: 440
|
Thankx
Great thread thank you for starting it. I am not to the stage of a cpu install yet. It will be a good resource when I am ready.
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 10:11
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Boat: Looking for a new boat
Posts: 2,571
|
I have a toughbook cf 18 that we plug into and inverter, but I hate the idea of going from DC to AC to DC again so will be getting a 12v supply. In the meantime I usually just wake it up and put it to sleep on it's own battery. Can anyone way how many amps I am wasting in the conversion process? The Cf18 draws about 4 amps.
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 10:39
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between the devil and the deep blue sea
Boat: a sailing boat
Posts: 20,950
|
Dacust, you must be talking of the monitors with contrast just good for the navtable, if you keep the windows shut. But the sunlight viewable stuff uses way more energy. The oled won't but it is not yet here.
However, reading your msg and checking against the web I found you are right - probably now possible to get the numbers you quote, rather than what I quoted.
I noted this year Acer introduced some model which are "36%" more power efficient. Good.
b.
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 13:36
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly on the boat. Occasionally at our condo in Port St Lucie, FL.
Boat: Manta 42 Sailcat -Toucan Dream
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnakiel
Dacust, you must be talking of the monitors with contrast just good for the navtable, if you keep the windows shut. But the sunlight viewable stuff uses way more energy. The oled won't but it is not yet here.
However, reading your msg and checking against the web I found you are right - probably now possible to get the numbers you quote, rather than what I quoted.
I noted this year Acer introduced some model which are "36%" more power efficient. Good.
b.
|
b.,
I just redid my test to be sure I remembered this correctly. With the Argonaut screen powered and running opencapn I read 10 amps at 12.8v. when I remove power it drops to 8.5. That's less than 19.2 watts for a very sunlight readable 15" screen. Not bad!
Regards,
Chris
SV Toucan Dream
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 13:38
|
#27
|
Obsfucator, Second Class
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeast USA.
Boat: 1982 Sea Ray SRV360
Posts: 1,745
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnakiel
Dacust, you must be talking of the monitors with contrast just good for the navtable, if you keep the windows shut. But the sunlight viewable stuff uses way more energy. The oled won't but it is not yet here.
However, reading your msg and checking against the web I found you are right - probably now possible to get the numbers you quote, rather than what I quoted.
I noted this year Acer introduced some model which are "36%" more power efficient. Good.
b.
|
Yep, when I looked for a link for my post, I was surprised they were that low. That's good news. But they are still a grand to start. And 1,500 with touchscreen. But that's way cheaper than a coupla years ago.
-dan
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 13:41
|
#28
|
Obsfucator, Second Class
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeast USA.
Boat: 1982 Sea Ray SRV360
Posts: 1,745
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris blair
b.,
I just redid my test to be sure I remembered this correctly. With the Argonaut screen powered and running opencapn I read 10 amps at 12.8v. when I remove power it drops to 8.5. That's less than 19.2 watts for a very sunlight readable 15" screen. Not bad!
Regards,
Chris
SV Toucan Dream
|
Wow, that's dramatically lower than even the ones I found!
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 15:52
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between the devil and the deep blue sea
Boat: a sailing boat
Posts: 20,950
|
OK, and the Argonaut price how does it stand up against a thing like Garmin 620 (which I believe is about 750 USD) ? BTW are the connectors (power and data) fully waterproof (IPX7)?
I love the idea of having only "household' electronics onboard - hate to pay for things that are supposed to do only one thing, cost me loads, and then they are often the first to break.
b.
|
|
|
31-08-2009, 16:23
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: Bristol 38.8
Posts: 1,625
|
By the time you get to a sunlight viewable screen and decent weatherproofing you are already above the cost of a Garmin 545, 620 or 640, and those come with a complete set of charts.
I have an old Sony Vaio laptop at the nav station. It's my entertainment center as well as my backup GPS (using Rose Point). Every week I back up my data on a portable drive which goes in a waterproof bag.
If the vaio dies, I'll just buy another laptop. Taiwanese electronics are comsumables, not capital investments. The processor and operating system will be out of date in 2-3 years no matter how much you spend initially.
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|