Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 27-08-2007, 19:10   #1
Registered User
 
sundown's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 108
Dreged depth of the ICW

We are in the route planning stage of the trip to bring a 58 foot boat that has 10foot draft from Nova Scotia around to British Columbia Canada via Panama.

My buddy was talking to an east coast insurance salesman on the phone and was told that the ICW would NOT be a good route because some States have not been dredging the ICW.

I would appreciate comment from folk who are familiar with the ICW about the veracity of this statement re depth.

I would also appreciate local knowledge about sections that we could use.
sundown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2007, 19:17   #2
Moderator Emeritus
 
Pblais's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hayes, VA
Boat: Gozzard 36
Posts: 8,700
Images: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Pblais
The depth on the ICW is quite fluid and changes quickly. It's not well maintained either. Skipper Bob has about the best and latest info on the ICW. With a 10 ft draft you are not going to be navigating long sections of the ICW and probably not many short ones either. Any hope of ever having 10 ft dredged would be exceptionally optimistic even in a long time frame. The indications is the ICW is on it's way under as a long distance route.

BTW, this is not a "States" issue this is a Federal issue. None of the states pay anything to maintaining the ICW. This all comes from the Army Corps of Engineers. The President has not been a fan of the ICW and didn't initiate authorizations in the past few years. Only additions to the budget via congress have funded anything for the ICW. It's been very lean and the situation is not getting better.
__________________
Paul Blais
s/v Bright Eyes Gozzard 36
37 15.7 N 76 28.9 W
Pblais is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2007, 19:29   #3
Registered User
 
sundown's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 108
Thanks Paul - it looks like it will be an ocean cruise.
sundown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2007, 00:45   #4
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 47,901
Images: 241
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAYS
MLW Depths, as of August 9/07
http://www.sas.usace.army.mil/AIWWPROF-aug07.pdf
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 15:10   #5
Registered User
 
Pete the Cat's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maine and California
Boat: Tartan 37 "Velera"
Posts: 405
Dredged Depth

I just came around from San Francisco to Maine. Paul is right about the ICW. You would not be able to do much of it.

I would strongly suggest you think carefully about your route. The trades would suggest that you go down through the Eastern Caribbean and over to Panama. Then you might think about going to Hawaii (I am not kidding) rather than bash up the Pacific side. I do not envy you.
__________________
Ray Durkee
S/V Velera
Tartan 37
Castine, Maine
Pete the Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 16:18   #6
cruiser

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,525
And what about that new Inside Passage route opening up? If we get a few more cars on the road and electric appliances plugged into coal-produced electricity, heck... you could swing by Russia on the way over.

(sorry... not a useful post, but yes... the ICW will not, in most areas, support your 10' draft)
ssullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 17:49   #7
Registered User
 
sundown's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 108
Thanks Pete:
I will fwd the route suggestion to the skipper. We have already taken the advice and are not planning on using the ICW but the advice about the Eastern Carribbean is apreciated
sundown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 21:11   #8
Registered User
 
phorvati's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Boat: Tayana FD-12
Posts: 1,165
Images: 6
Hi sundown,, my wife and I took our C&C 38 with a 7'6" draft through some of the areas last winter and here are some of my experiences.
I think the Army Corps of Engineers owe me a hefty sum for doing some of the dredging. Lets see... Inside the Long island, outside of NJ, up the Delaware river, along the chesapeake bay, is all doable and very pleasant. Then in hampton VA, you'll definately have to go outside and around cape hatteras. You will not take 10' through coinjock and alligator river which is the ICW route inside the Cape Hetteras.
Then, while further south, 8' tidal swings in SC and Georgia will enable you to bring it through some ICW areas but its not worth it. And then again, florida is a nightmare. They owe me too for dredging the Okeechobee and ICW area .
I also found that those updated MLW depths are not very reliable. Nobody really knows how to avoid some of the shoalling in the ICW which made it very hard to relax. What amazed me is how exhausted I was after motoring in the ICW all day, with anywhere from 3 feet to less than a half-a-foot under my keel. I couldn't relax even for a bit. Next time, I am definately taking the outside route.
Petar
phorvati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 09:00   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sailing around the world
Boat: 56' Challenger
Posts: 7
ICW

I forgot just how nerve racking the ICW can be... I did it 3 years ago... I have a West Sail 32 with 5' draft. I guess it really provs I'm a sailor... Having to line up markers and try to stay in a moving channel... yuck!
imasailorgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 09:47   #10
Registered User
 
Jentine's Avatar

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cruising on the hook
Boat: 34’ Marine Trader
Posts: 752
Images: 5
Wink

What kind of 58' boat has a 10' draft? I must assume it is a sailboat. If so, even if the ICW could support your depth, the bridges are too short for the mast. The maximum clearance on the ICW is 65'.
Have you considered the northwest passage?
__________________
Jim

We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
--Aristotle
Jentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 09:35   #11
Registered User
 
Sunspot Baby's Avatar

Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Bern, NC
Boat: Prout Manta 38' Catamaran - Sunspot Baby
Posts: 1,521
Images: 14
Paul: There is a "States" issue. While it is federal money, GA did not go after it and now claims the worst "shallowest" waters on the ICW. Some states did a much better job of getting funds allocated to dredging their waters.

George
__________________
She took my address and my name
Put my credit to shame
Sunspot Baby, sure had a real good time
Bob Seger
Sunspot Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
icw

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A trip down the ICW... exposure General Sailing Forum 8 04-05-2007 04:30
Depth sounder alarm in San Pedro Channel . . . ? Mary General Sailing Forum 15 29-10-2006 09:57
Depth Sounder Installation Steve Kidson Marine Electronics 1 12-06-2006 04:25
Depth Sounder Thru-Hull Alternative? markpj23 Marine Electronics 17 16-05-2006 22:34

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.