Recent thread I was looking at started me thinking on this. I took this excerpt (attached) from NOAA chart 18427, this is a little bit of
water that concerns the thread that started me thinking it covers some tricky passes and mud flats from Skagit Bay to up to Padilla Bay including Deception Pass. I downloaded this today it's totally up to date, but the
survey data is, well,
parts of it are a bit stale you might say.
How do you folks out there deal with this kind of issue on
ENC charts? I don't see a way of pulling this kind of info out of them, it's why I prefer to use RNC
charts, and look over paper charts, admittedly I'm a bit of a luddite.
It's like streaming
music for me, I like to do that cause it's so convenient I miss all the context though. The liner notes gave so much info, like who performed on tracks, producers, songwriters, notes on making the album, hell a lot of my old-time CD's give banjo and fiddle tunings, it's context that gets stripped off of the digital medium. Same thing seems to happen with anything that gets digitized be it maps,
music, or nautical charts.
So how do ya'll deal with getting the big picture on
ENC charts? I'm really interested in perspectives this thing.