Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-02-2011, 18:48   #1
Registered User
 
lowride14's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Boat: 1962 Hunter Sedan 38'
Posts: 57
Using Too Big an Anchor ?

I'm going to be living off the hook for a little while and i'm planning on getting a bruce anchor. I only have two different sized danforths right now, not somthing i'm gonna be able to sleep at night with. I have a 38' boat and i found a 33lbs bruce for sale, is there anything wrong with using an anchor meant for a much bigger boat? ( i have a 1000lbs electric windlass)

I have been going by this chart for sizes
Anchor weight guide

__________________
Never trust a man with a clean workshop
lowride14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 18:51   #2
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 165
Buy too big an anchor? Can ya do that?
foamcore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:01   #3
Moderator
 
Jim Cate's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: cruising SW Pacific
Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
Posts: 21,195
Lowride, a brief inspection of that chart reveals that they recommend a 16.5 lb Bruce for a 36 foot boat. Preposterous, I say!

Our last boat was a retired IOR one-tonner, 36 ft OAL, around 20,000 lbs loaded for full time cruising. We used a 44 lb Bruce on 10 mm chain and felt it to be marginal at times.

If you are planning extensive anchoring in real world cruising conditions (ie, not always the best bottoms, shelter and weather) I would suggest that the 33 lb Bruce is not too BIG for your boat, but too SMALL.

Cheers,

Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II lying Towlers Bay, NSW, Oz
__________________
Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II, lying Port Cygnet Tasmania once again.
Jim Cate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:03   #4
Ram
Registered User
 
Ram's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cruising Greece
Boat: Cat in the med & Trawler in Florida
Posts: 2,323
Images: 27
I think that guide is way off-too light- and i would not sleep good at night with any bruce, get the Ronca or Manson Supreme Anchor - this is perhaps the most important gear/investment you can buy
Ram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:15   #5
Registered User
 
Minggat's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Pacific
Boat: Islander 36
Posts: 1,593
Phones go off the hook. Sailors live ON the hook.

If you're going to live on the hook, "too big" would not be the right question.
__________________
Minggat
Minggat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:15   #6
Registered User
 
Sailmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Boat: ‘01 Catana 401
Posts: 9,626
33 is not too big for your boat, in fact I feel it's just a little too small. It'll be fine in the mud so long as it's not really blowing, but you would sleep better with bigger.
Sailmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:25   #7
Registered User
 
markpierce's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central California
Boat: M/V Carquinez Coot
Posts: 3,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowride14 View Post
I'm going to be living off the hook for a little while and i'm planning on getting a bruce anchor. I only have two different sized danforths right now, not somthing i'm gonna be able to sleep at night with. I have a 38' boat and i found a 33lbs bruce for sale, is there anything wrong with using an anchor meant for a much bigger boat? ( i have a 1000lbs electric windlass)
I wouldn't begin to feel comfortable unless I had a 44-pound Bruce for the main anchor for a 38-foot boat, although a 33-pounder would work well in many situations.
markpierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:27   #8
Registered User
 
Delfin's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Anacortes, WA
Boat: 55' Romsdal
Posts: 2,103
I have had a 44 # Bruce on a Cape George cutter, 36', 12 tons, and a 176# Bruce on our present boat. The Bruce is not the best choice in lighter weights. They set very quickly, but have limited holding power, again in the lighter weights - under 100#. I would look carefully at a Rocna, or better yet a Sarca if you can pay the freight from Australia. You'll sleep better at night....
Delfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:29   #9
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,000
There's this fellow who designed Jedi who wrote: if people start laughing about your big anchor you know you're on the right path: trade it in for the next bigger size again and you should be good.

Jedi is 25 metric tons (27 US) and our Bruce is 80 kg (= 176 lbs !) which is ridiculously oversized according to any table. People laughed about our Bruce a lot. When we survived hurricane Ivan with 120 knots sustained winds while anchored behind this Bruce and without even dragging, people stopped laughing.

We sleep good while at anchor. In fact, I only get up during squalls when I hear the screaming from boats that are dragging come too close to us

ciao!
Nick.
s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:31   #10
Registered User
 
lowride14's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Boat: 1962 Hunter Sedan 38'
Posts: 57
hmm good to know guys, i'm trying to do this on a budget so i guess i'll keep my eyes open still for a while longer as its in a nice lil slip right now. Just for your reference, I will be anchoring off the coast of vancouver island.
__________________
Never trust a man with a clean workshop
lowride14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:34   #11
Registered User
 
lowride14's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Boat: 1962 Hunter Sedan 38'
Posts: 57
what style would be the best for the victoria and area and what minimum size would you recomend?
__________________
Never trust a man with a clean workshop
lowride14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:34   #12
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Palm Beach
Boat: Parkins Herreshoff 28
Posts: 932
yep no such thing as too big, main hook on my 30' 7 tonner is going to be a 45lb cqr, alternate 33lb bruce, peace of mind is priceless
pressuredrop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 19:50   #13
Registered User

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Boat: 40' Silverton Aftcabin with twin Crusaders
Posts: 1,791
NO, I don't want another "my anchor is better than yours." With that stated, be very careful with a Bruce. I used to use both a 33 & 44 in my old 30' Hunter. They both worked reliably until our harbors filled with ell grass. Those anchors just pull huge divots of bottom when I backed down to set the beasts. I now use a Delta with no problems.

I still see people around here with them on the bow. I often wonder how they properly set them but then again, maybe they don't.

Foggy
foggysail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 20:15   #14
Marine Service Provider
 
craigsmith's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 407
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowride14 View Post
I'm going to be living off the hook for a little while and i'm planning on getting a bruce anchor. I only have two different sized danforths right now, not somthing i'm gonna be able to sleep at night with. I have a 38' boat and i found a 33lbs bruce for sale, is there anything wrong with using an anchor meant for a much bigger boat? ( i have a 1000lbs electric windlass)

I have been going by this chart for sizes
Anchor weight guide
Notice how that chart doesn't qualify its recommendations? What conditions are they sizing the anchor for, based on what data? Are those anchor sizes good for 10 knots wind in clay, or 100 knots wind in mud? It's also 15 years out-of-date. It's junk, probably regurgitated rules-of-thumb tabulated into a chart to look good - ignore it.

A 33 lb Bruce is far too small for your boat. You also can't get genuine Bruces anymore, unless you mean a 2nd hand one, in which case look more closely as folk will often say Bruce or CQR or whatever when they're really talking about a knock-off.
craigsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 20:38   #15
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigsmith View Post
folk will often say Bruce or CQR or whatever when they're really talking about a knock-off.
yes and both these designs rely on compound shapes which are difficult and expensive to fabricate and where the knock-off's cut corners to save cost with dramatic results.

For the OP, I have no clue what bottom conditions to expect there and if you want to anchor semi-permanently there. If conditions allow it I would consider creating a permanent anchor system with 2 or 3 Danforth type anchors that you leave there when you go out for a sail.

cheers,
Nick.
s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
anchor


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Big Is Too Big to Singlehand ? kcmarcet General Sailing Forum 35 02-08-2020 04:58
'Big' Anchor Question NotQuiteLost Anchoring & Mooring 8 02-10-2010 16:43
How Big Is Big Enough for Anchoring on the Bay of Fundy? OrangeCrush Monohull Sailboats 9 17-09-2009 09:43
Big ole Claw anchor for semi-permenant mooring? sluissa Anchoring & Mooring 10 09-06-2008 08:26

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:19.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.