Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Anchoring & Mooring
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-06-2013, 08:51   #151
Registered User
 
Delfin's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Anacortes, WA
Boat: 55' Romsdal
Posts: 2,103
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Troup View Post
Dockhead

Your solution to the mud is admirably simple, and fine as far as it goes, but it does nothing to prevent the on-deck trail from the bow to the mast.
If, as you say you will have hydraulics you might consider a hi pressure wash down pump, aka pressure washer. Besides easily blasting off whatever comes up with the anchor including kelp, it is a great way to keep the boat very clean between washings. I consider mine one of the most useful pieces of equipment aboard, although you rarely see them. The pump measures about 10" square so they are hardly a space burden.
__________________
https://delfin.talkspot.com
I can picture in my head a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it. - Jack Handey
Delfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 08:51   #152
Registered User
 
Kettlewell's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Boat: Finnsailer 38
Posts: 5,312
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

I can't recall if anyone in this thread says they are using something like Brait, Octoplait, or Megabraid for a snubber--one of the 8-plait, or 12-plait nylon lines. Some of them aren't available in small enough sizes for me, but for those of you using 1/2-inch or 5/8-inch snubbers it seems like one of those braids would be the ultimate for the stretchy part.

One thing the marine ropes have going for them, as opposed to climbing ropes and others, is the marine ropes apparently have coatings on the fibers that drastically reduce water aborption and loss of strength, and also reduce friction within the rope when things are wet. I don't know what they do to it, but I have found that New England Ropes 3-strand nylon lasts and lasts and lasts, and never stiffens up.
__________________
JJKettlewell
Kettlewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 09:31   #153
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonJo View Post
Evans,

>>If I have this correct your have transferred from a nylon (climbing rope) snubber to a dacron snubber.
No, my current snubbers are dyneema from cleat to just past bow roller and then nylon (climbing line although i will also test some nylon 8brait when i get my hands on a piece) to the dyneema soft shackle chain attachments.

This system design has excellent chafe prevention (with the dyneema) and excellent stretch (with the nylon), and I think the only major remaining design question is which nylon construction offers the greatest resistance to heat damage. I can find no good data on that, and may have to construct a cycle test next winter to figure it out.

Interestingly NER, who I copied this idea from, suggest nylon double braid construction for the nylon portion. I am going to ask an engineer i know there why, as I would have thought that would be the last choice of construction (least stretch and most heat retention). But I suspect they have a good reason, which will be valuable to understand.

This dyneema/nylon hybrid design had zero failures thru hurricane sandy and Irene. I am told it was the only major design/system to have zero failures.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 10:28   #154
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Helsinki (Summer); Cruising the Baltic Sea this year!
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 33,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kettlewell View Post
I can't recall if anyone in this thread says they are using something like Brait, Octoplait, or Megabraid for a snubber--one of the 8-plait, or 12-plait nylon lines. Some of them aren't available in small enough sizes for me, but for those of you using 1/2-inch or 5/8-inch snubbers it seems like one of those braids would be the ultimate for the stretchy part.

One thing the marine ropes have going for them, as opposed to climbing ropes and others, is the marine ropes apparently have coatings on the fibers that drastically reduce water aborption and loss of strength, and also reduce friction within the rope when things are wet. I don't know what they do to it, but I have found that New England Ropes 3-strand nylon lasts and lasts and lasts, and never stiffens up.
I have been using octo for years. Fantastic stuff. It's also superior for rope rode.
__________________
"You sea! I resign myself to you also . . . . I guess what you mean,
I behold from the beach your crooked inviting fingers,
I believe you refuse to go back without feeling of me;
We must have a turn together . . . . I undress . . . . hurry me out of sight of the land,
Cushion me soft . . . . rock me in billowy drowse,
Dash me with amorous wet . . . . I can repay you."
Walt Whitman
Dockhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 10:29   #155
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,000
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockhead View Post
I have been using octo for years. Fantastic stuff. It's also superior for rope rode.
I use Yale 1.25" octoplait (polyester I think!) for my secondary anchor rode but ordinary nylon 3-strand for my snubbers as it's quicker to splice and works as good as I wish.
s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 10:41   #156
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Helsinki (Summer); Cruising the Baltic Sea this year!
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 33,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post

I use Yale 1.25" octoplait (polyester I think!) for my secondary anchor rode but ordinary nylon 3-strand for my snubbers as it's quicker to splice and works as good as I wish.
My secondary rode is also polyester.

3 strand works fine for a snubber, but octo will give more energy absorption if you need it. I still can't splice octo, though - as far as I can tell, it requires witchcraft. :-)
__________________
"You sea! I resign myself to you also . . . . I guess what you mean,
I behold from the beach your crooked inviting fingers,
I believe you refuse to go back without feeling of me;
We must have a turn together . . . . I undress . . . . hurry me out of sight of the land,
Cushion me soft . . . . rock me in billowy drowse,
Dash me with amorous wet . . . . I can repay you."
Walt Whitman
Dockhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 10:52   #157
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockhead View Post
To continue the thought about pitching: . . . .
-- we're concerned only about the angular velocity.
No, actually you should only be concerned with the velocity vector component pointed at the anchor. With 5:1 scope that's 11 degrees above horizontal. Relatively little of the angular 'pitch velocity' is in that resultant vector direction (because pitching is primarily a vertical velocity). A velocity component at a higher angle than that (the chain scope angle) is really only lifting the chain (note: yes, I am simplifying here).

Pitching does introduce a significant fatigue cycle.

Since the waves have forward velocity, their impact will drive the boat back and will impart some amount of aft velocity (in the direction of the anchor), peaking as the bow climbs up the wave. But that is captured (mostly) by the x/y velocity measurement.

If you have really serious waves, there can be a breaking crest 'jet' at the top, which can have quite high direct force transfer (the 'jet will have velocity in double digit knots and weight about a ton per sqm). This is a significant issue on para-anchors. But it is not a boat velocity issue.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 10:56   #158
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Just one other comment from the mooring experience base . . . . regarding bridles and back up snubbers (on monohulls) . . . . the mooring experience says that two equal length snubbers (a typical bridle) will fail well before one shorter (primary) and one longer (back up) snubber.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 11:12   #159
Registered User
 
colemj's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Presently on US East Coast
Boat: Manta 40 "Reach"
Posts: 10,108
Images: 12
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kettlewell View Post
I can't recall if anyone in this thread says they are using something like Brait, Octoplait, or Megabraid for a snubber--one of the 8-plait, or 12-plait nylon lines. Some of them aren't available in small enough sizes for me, but for those of you using 1/2-inch or 5/8-inch snubbers it seems like one of those braids would be the ultimate for the stretchy part.
Brait is what we use for our bridle (snubber for you monos). Started out with double braid, but that proved too "jerky", went to 3-strand which was good but got stiff and cumbersome, then moved to brait which was just right...

Mark
__________________
www.svreach.com

You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.
colemj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 11:13   #160
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Helsinki (Summer); Cruising the Baltic Sea this year!
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 33,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by estarzinger View Post

No, actually you should only be concerned with the velocity vector component pointed at the anchor. With 5:1 scope that's 11 degrees above horizontal. Relatively little of the angular 'pitch velocity' is in that resultant vector direction (because pitching is primarily a vertical velocity). A velocity component at a higher angle than that (the chain scope angle) is really only lifting the chain (note: yes, I am simplifying here).

Pitching does introduce a significant fatigue cycle.

Since the waves have forward velocity, their impact will drive the boat back and will impart some amount of aft velocity (in the direction of the anchor), peaking as the bow climbs up the wave. But that is captured (mostly) by the x/y velocity measurement.

If you have really serious waves, there can be a breaking crest 'jet' at the top, which can have quite high direct force transfer (the 'jet will have velocity in double digit knots and weight about a ton per sqm). This is a significant issue on para-anchors. But it is not a boat velocity issue.
I stand corrected! Wow, that`s a good analysis.
__________________
"You sea! I resign myself to you also . . . . I guess what you mean,
I behold from the beach your crooked inviting fingers,
I believe you refuse to go back without feeling of me;
We must have a turn together . . . . I undress . . . . hurry me out of sight of the land,
Cushion me soft . . . . rock me in billowy drowse,
Dash me with amorous wet . . . . I can repay you."
Walt Whitman
Dockhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 11:14   #161
Registered User
 
colemj's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Presently on US East Coast
Boat: Manta 40 "Reach"
Posts: 10,108
Images: 12
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by estarzinger View Post
Just one other comment from the mooring experience base . . . . regarding bridles and back up snubbers (on monohulls) . . . . the mooring experience says that two equal length snubbers (a typical bridle) will fail well before one shorter (primary) and one longer (back up) snubber.
Is there reasoning behind this? A bridle is about the only option multis have.

Mark
__________________
www.svreach.com

You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.
colemj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 11:20   #162
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemj View Post

Is there reasoning behind this? A bridle is about the only option multis have.

Mark
You can back up with a longer bridle... also makes you practice the octo splice a bit more so you will have no problems when doing them for me
__________________
“It’s a trap!” - Admiral Ackbar.

s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 11:58   #163
Registered User
 
cfarrar's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklin, Maine U.S.A
Boat: Allures 44
Posts: 734
Images: 2
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

I'm not sure about an 8-plait snubber. I find that Octo is susceptible to the strands being "picked" on anything sharp or hard. When using my Octo rode (on the rare occasions I deploy all my chain) I attach a sacrificial (3-strand) snubber to take the abuse.
cfarrar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 14:29   #164
Registered User
 
DumnMad's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Nelson NZ; boat in Coffs Harbour
Boat: 45ft Ketch
Posts: 1,559
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Thanks guys. You've conducted a good seminar here today.
DumnMad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 16:00   #165
cruiser

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittwater, Sydney
Boat: Lightwave, Catamaran, 11.5m (38')
Posts: 1,000
Re: Choice of Material for Snubbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kettlewell View Post

One thing the marine ropes have going for them, as opposed to climbing ropes and others, is the marine ropes apparently have coatings on the fibers that drastically reduce water aborption and loss of strength, and also reduce friction within the rope when things are wet. I don't know what they do to it, but I have found that New England Ropes 3-strand nylon lasts and lasts and lasts, and never stiffens up.
Climbing ropes can also be supplied with coatings to reduce any degradation, or reduction in performance, by water during use. Of course if you are a cheapskate like me and get your rope free from a climbing wall it will not be coated (as it seldom rains indoors).

I have seen no test results on the longevity of these coatings nor have I seen any independent tests on how good they are. The manufacturers point out that a wet rope is weaker, they point out that some of their ropes are treated (to make them more water resistant) - but omit to say (technically) what affect the coating actually has, or how long it lasts. Coated ropes cost more, of course.

Water reduces ultimate breaking strength but how it impacts ultimate breaking strength at low cyclic loading (a marine anchor snubber) is another area I can find no technical detail. The only testing of cyclic loading is on climbing rope, which also has the greatest elasticity, how cyclic loading impacts 3 strand or 8 or 12 plait (wet or dry) no idea.

Choice, in the absence of any data, must depends on what is available of a size to suit the individual, how important it is to splice and whether one wants to prioritise longevity (probably 3ply or 8/12 plait) or elasticity (probably climbing rope - limited size range) but this latter can be overcome with a longer snubber. Dacron can also come into the mix alongside nylon.

But it does seem there is some room to do a whole range of testing (including can a snubber be too long).

Jonathan
JonJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 18:10.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.