|
|
01-02-2018, 19:49
|
#46
|
Moderator and Certifiable Refitter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South of 43 S, Australia
Boat: C.L.O.D.
Posts: 21,393
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pinguino
....
Fujinon sends semicomplete glasses to the US where they have laser filters fitted before entering service as M22s with the military. As well as 'Fujinon' they have 'Kama-Tech' and 'Northrop Grumman' branding on them.
|
Thanks El Ping, that answers my question about why I sometimes see "Made in the USA" Fujinons. I wonder if they use their "best glass" in these models.
And reading between the lines on their spec sheets, it seems that the main difference between the Fujinons 7x50 MTR and the 7x50 FMTR is the "field flattener" lenses. The glass and coatings appear to be the same.
Anyone know how much benefit this is in real life?
__________________
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangereous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. T.E. Lawrence
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 20:20
|
#47
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Back in the boat in Patagonia
Boat: Westerly Sealord
Posts: 8,378
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Well... the MTR appears to be discontinued but the only diff I can see in the specs is in the eye relief. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compa...USA_206783-USA
One assumes the FMTR is optically superior to the MTR but my tired old eyes probably couldn't tell the difference...
The military M22s are based on the Fujinon Nautilus ... smaller and lighter than the Polaris ( 1.26kg v 1.52kg but only 0.85kg for the Fujinon Mariners).
https://www.opticsplanet.com/fujinon...rs-7x50ar.html
Nice enough glasses but not a patch on the Polaris... the laser filters in the M22 impart a bit of a hue on the image so not so good in poor light. Also the reticule keeps on reminding me that I have curvature of the spine or a permanent starboard list or something...
I imagine the Nautilus are wholly made in Japan. Exporting the carcasses to the US and fitting the laser filters there probably mean they can sell the M22s to the military as 'US made'.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 20:26
|
#48
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Back in the boat in Patagonia
Boat: Westerly Sealord
Posts: 8,378
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaltyMetals
..........No one has mentioned the brand in this thread but mine are Swarovski 7 X 50. Simply superb clarity and light transmission. My recommendation is to ditch the idea of also having stabilised binos. There are plenty of other things on a boat where the money might be better spent.
Andrew
"Genial Bee"
|
Colour me green....
What model of Swarovski do you have? I assume that pre purchase you compared them with bins like the Zeiss, the Steiners and the Fuji Polaris.... I would be interested to read your thoughts..
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 21:48
|
#49
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
Boat: Fairweather Mariner/Westsail 39
Posts: 71
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
I have a pair of Fuji Polaris (with compass) that have been in use for about 40 years now and are still excellent. I also have a pair of Steiner Commanders that I've had for five years and they are also still in perfect condition after several thousand sea miles of use. I did have a pair of Fuji stabilized binoculars which i kept in the case unless needed, treated very gingerly, removed the batteries between use, etc and they lasted less than a year ( I doubt that they had been out of the case more than 10 times). They were under warranty, I sent them to be repaired and they broke again almost immediately, unable to withstand the shock of setting them down gingerly on the chart table. They are the single piece of marine gear I am most disappointed with. Now I have a nice yellow waterproof case they once lived in after I threw the stabalized binoculars into the trash where they belonged.
Just my experience. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 00:27
|
#50
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Back in the boat in Patagonia
Boat: Westerly Sealord
Posts: 8,378
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wotname
Thanks El Ping, that answers my question about why I sometimes see "Made in the USA" Fujinons. I wonder if they use their "best glass" in these models.
And reading between the lines on their spec sheets, it seems that the main difference between the Fujinons 7x50 MTR and the 7x50 FMTR is the "field flattener" lenses. The glass and coatings appear to be the same.
Anyone know how much benefit this is in real life?
|
Dunno... mine are MTRs... never seen or used FMTRs....
MTRs = white lettering on black body .... FMTRs yellow lettering on green body AFAIAA
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 01:53
|
#51
|
Moderator and Certifiable Refitter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South of 43 S, Australia
Boat: C.L.O.D.
Posts: 21,393
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pinguino
Dunno... mine are MTRs... never seen or used FMTRs....
MTRs = white lettering on black body .... FMTRs yellow lettering on green body AFAIAA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pinguino
|
What's the F between friends
__________________
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangereous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. T.E. Lawrence
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:24
|
#52
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Maryland, USA
Boat: 58' Sedan Bridge
Posts: 5,596
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by squarerigger
I did have a pair of Fuji stabilized binoculars which i kept in the case unless needed, treated very gingerly, removed the batteries between use, etc and they lasted less than a year ( I doubt that they had been out of the case more than 10 times). They were under warranty, I sent them to be repaired and they broke again almost immediately, unable to withstand the shock of setting them down gingerly on the chart table. They are the single piece of marine gear I am most disappointed with.
|
Which Fuji IS model was that?
-Chris
__________________
Chesapeake Bay, USA.
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 09:15
|
#53
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
Boat: Fairweather Mariner/Westsail 39
Posts: 71
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
The binoculars were the Fujinon Techo-Stabl Image Stabilized 14x40 currently selling (unfortunately) at a discount on-line chandlery for $1300. Given previous posts in this thread it does occur to me they have one use I hadn't considered. if someone breaks into your boat looking for the most expensive binoculars to run off with, they might be lured into stealing those instead of the practical ones.
|
|
|
03-02-2018, 05:46
|
#54
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Maryland, USA
Boat: 58' Sedan Bridge
Posts: 5,596
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by squarerigger
The binoculars were the Fujinon Techo-Stabl Image Stabilized 14x40 currently selling (unfortunately) at a discount on-line chandlery for $1300.
|
Thanks for model info. I haven't really been looking for reviews, but your experience is the only bad one I've seen (or noticed) for that model...
-Chris
__________________
Chesapeake Bay, USA.
|
|
|
03-02-2018, 06:15
|
#55
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Boat: 2017 Leopard 40
Posts: 2,720
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger42c
Thanks for model info. I haven't really been looking for reviews, but your experience is the only bad one I've seen (or noticed) for that model...
-Chris
|
Same here. I think that’s quite surprising. I’ve had my 14x40 Techno Stabi Fuji’s since 2001 - yes I’ve been careful with them about impact but they’ve seen plenty of salt spray and careful use. Still in perfect operation and clarity after 17 years, so my experience has been good
|
|
|
04-02-2018, 00:40
|
#56
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Back in the boat in Patagonia
Boat: Westerly Sealord
Posts: 8,378
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wotname
What's the F between friends
|
It seems that the MTR Poseidons are still available in Straya and at a very fair price... https://www.digidirect.com.au/binocu...r_bp229a-2_501 but for a few bob more... https://www.digidirect.com.au/shopping/printme/13221
And you can still find new Zeiss 7x50s as well .... said by experts in the field of optics to be superior to the Fujis... but at a price which is well beyond my paygrade..... https://www.dccameras.com.au/carl-ze...lars-6646.html
A quiet day here as you can see..... you could check out Jim's MTRs and then wait for my chum Steve to come back from Maria Island and have a look at his FMTRs... he bought them on my recommendation last year...
|
|
|
04-02-2018, 01:20
|
#57
|
Moderator and Certifiable Refitter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South of 43 S, Australia
Boat: C.L.O.D.
Posts: 21,393
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pinguino
|
Yep, those Zeiss could come with a free set steak knives and a block of flats in Tasmania and still be beyond my pay grade.
The FMTRs from digidirect are very attractive; they currently don't have stock but they reckon they can get them within 14 days. I suspect they don't have stock of the MTRs either and perhaps can't get them. Doesn't matter to me, the added eye relief of the FMTRs is enough to sway me towards them. Just got to get the pennies together...
__________________
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangereous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. T.E. Lawrence
|
|
|
19-02-2018, 07:51
|
#58
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Caribbean
Boat: Oyster 66
Posts: 1,366
|
Re: Binoculars - Traditional or Stabilised???
My Fujinon 14x40 and my Steiner 7x50 are often on deck together. If it is rough or very wet then the Fujinon go below, but within easy reach. I use the Steiners when I want a very quick look (no need to focus) and if I want to take a bearing (has a built in compass). They are quite tough, so I don't worry about them so much. For every other use I use the Fujinon. The image is far superior. Even at night. I know it has a narrower field, so in theory and inferior image because of less light gathering ability, but in practice I can't see the illumination difference and anyway the Fujinon's good image and the advantage of stabilisation make it superior.
The proof of the pudding is that I use the Fujnon 90% of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|