|
09-02-2012, 21:30
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
|
No Swages or Staylocks Needed
Anybody see anything wrong with rigging my upper shrounds with lengths of chain to shackles to turnbuckles?
|
|
|
09-02-2012, 21:42
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kemah, TX
Boat: Moody 42
Posts: 235
|
Re: No swages or staylocks needed
Your kidding, right?
|
|
|
09-02-2012, 21:45
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Belleville, MI
Boat: Catalina 27 - Handyman NO# 1229771
Posts: 209
|
Re: No swages or staylocks needed
Quote:
Originally Posted by clifflindsey
Anybody see anything wrong with rigging my upper shrounds with lengths of chain to shackles to turnbuckles?
|
Nope, I can't see a thing wrong with that,
|
|
|
09-02-2012, 21:48
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
|
Very serious.
|
|
|
09-02-2012, 22:48
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cruising NC, FL, Bahamas, TCI & VIs
Boat: 1964 Pearson Ariel 'Faith' / Pearson 424, sv Emerald Tide
Posts: 1,531
|
Re: No swages or staylocks needed
The weight aloft will be a significant issue.
If you use chain that would approach your working load limit needed, you will have a lot of weight up high... it would be a real problem.
I HAVE seen people use chain for the dolphin striker, and that was not (IMHO) a bad place to substitute chain for wire.... but you would do well to skip it elsewhere.
|
|
|
09-02-2012, 23:35
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v 'Faith'
The weight aloft will be a significant issue.
If you use chain that would approach your working load limit needed, you will have a lot of weight up high... it would be a real problem.
I HAVE seen people use chain for the dolphin striker, and that was not (IMHO) a bad place to substitute chain for wire.... but you would do well to skip it elsewhere.
|
This is on a trimaran with a beam of around 23 foot. The upper shrouds will attatch outside the amas on that greatest beam. That should positively effect the weight aloft ratio right?
What size chain would you subsitute 1/2 or maybe 5/8 cable for? Im not thinkin there would be significant weight change...
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 00:26
|
#7
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: gettin naughty on the beach in cornwall
Boat: 63 custom alloy sloop,macwester26,prout snowgoose 37 elite catamaran!
Posts: 10,594
|
Re: No swages or staylocks needed
ugly! why not use galvanised wire?
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 00:55
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Zealand
Boat: Trismus 37
Posts: 763
|
Re: No swages or staylocks needed
Its often been done at the lower end, generally by folk who havn't a lot of dough. usually they would be using galvanised wire as well, just as strong as SS just needs more TLC, (soaking in boiled linseed oil once or twice a year) have seen some over 30 years old that has been looked after, appeared as good as new, couldn't say that for SS. wouldn't use chain up high if you can avoid it though.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 03:15
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 223
|
Re: No swages or staylocks needed
My first question would be: why? If it's money, an excellent cheap alternative to modern SS jewellery, is galvanised wired terminated with spelter sockets, secured either with pored zinc or epoxy.
Something like this:
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 07:14
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nova Scotia until Spring 2021
Boat: Custom 41' Steel Pilothouse Cutter
Posts: 4,976
|
Re: No Swages or Staylocks Needed
Quote:
Originally Posted by clifflindsey
Anybody see anything wrong with rigging my upper shrounds with lengths of chain to shackles to turnbuckles?
|
I wish I had time to make a list, my friend.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:28
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by atoll
ugly! why not use galvanised wire?
|
Not ugly! Its an interdimensional modern day gypsy viking long tri. Its just.... Raw
Im going to seaech for galvy wire, I suppose that makes more sense... As long as theres no core and I can crimp or tug splice oit.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:35
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Boat: Mahe 36, Helia 44 Evo, MY 37
Posts: 5,731
|
Re: No Swages or Staylocks Needed
Why not us Amsteel braided rope. On a tri its all about light weight
|
|
|
14-02-2012, 18:33
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Boat: Pearson 281
Posts: 684
|
Re: No Swages or Staylocks Needed
Galvi wire looped around thimbles and put together with 3 bulldog clamps. Works fine. (look at Moitessier "The Long Way" for putting this together... worked for him for thousands of miles) W/o some sort of covers those clamps etc. will be snagging the sheets all the time) The installation is not as clean but just as secure as swaging and the added bonus of being able to see it letting go before it does.
Not all stainless is created equal such is the case with galvi so shop around. The english are still making the best supposedly and I used to know the best makers but not anymore As has been stated will need annual dressing...old school was a mix of pitch and lindseed oil. Staining the sails is a a problem for some. The old baggy wrinkle wasn't just about chafe...
BTW. I always carry 6' lengths of chain, thimbles and bulldogs in case of rigging failures that might occur where I can reach.
|
|
|
14-02-2012, 19:00
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vashon, WA
Boat: Haida 26', 18' Sea Kayak, 15' kayak, 6.5' skiff, shorts
Posts: 837
|
Re: No Swages or Staylocks Needed
Butler, I might do that on my boat just to piss people off! I already did the 7x7 liverpool splice galvy rig for a 24', but I didn't like it that much.
|
|
|
15-02-2012, 21:14
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Boat: Roberts, Offshore 44
Posts: 35
|
Dynex dux, rather than Amsteel, along with a good strong thimble and you are about as light as you can get. Easy to do splices and you are set. On the other hand, you can go old school with A good galvanized wire and it will out last the best. Galvanized wire does not have the work hardining issues that stainless has. If you parcel, then serve it, and slush it down, it will last just about forever. It is very time consuming to do this properly, but will work and look great on a traditional vessel. it will require annual maintenance however.
All chain shrouds or stays will be very heavy. It doesn't matter if your stability comes from lead ballest or a very wide beam, excessive weight aloft will decrease stability.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
No Threads to Display.
|
|