Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 20-05-2021, 11:36   #16
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 18,966
Re: New lifelines - open-bodied vs tubular turnbuckles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailcrazy View Post
I can see the benefit added of using uncoated, straight s/s cable over the vinyl-coated stuff. But I don't see the added value of Dynema over the cable??? Sure, it's a little added weight, but on a cruising boat-not an issue. The 1/4" cable is certainly strong enough, so what's the benefit of going Dynema...for those of you that have? We use the open turnbuckles on one end of ours, vice the tubular ones, and have never had an issue. And to my eye, they are not only functional (so I can adjust them as I might need to), but they are smaller and less bulky than the wraps/spicing I've seen. Until I see the value added, we'll stick with s/s cable.
An acquaintance of me went overboard mid Atlantic because of a snapshackle opening while peeing. Others reports involve failing swages etc. This happens relatively often.

With Dyneema there are no swages, turnbuckles etc, any failures you see long before they happen. Also, for laundry on the line, no more rust stains.
__________________
“It’s a trap!” - Admiral Ackbar.

s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2021, 12:23   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Boat: Hunter 40
Posts: 218
Re: New lifelines - open-bodied vs tubular turnbuckles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
Your splicing and lashing look top notch, love the French whipping

That said, I noticed the fuzziness on the Dyneema and it looks like the kind that had many reports on the forum where it broke when used as topping lift or halyard.

I only tried a couple different brands and keep it with Samson who uses genuine DSM Dyneema (Amsteel, Warpspeed etc.) which has proven to be reliable. None of the posters who reported failure could tell which brand the Dyneema was, which worries me but is also telling for the reason of failure.

I have Vectran that does that but is reliable, so fuzziness by itself doesn’t say anything.
Thanks for your reply Jedi.
The fuzziness is from dragging the dyneema through the staunchion holes, it was a tight fit. Probably should have used 6mm😁
__________________
Regards Craig
40 South is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2021, 18:24   #18
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cruising, now in USVIs
Boat: Taswell 43
Posts: 1,038
Re: New lifelines - open-bodied vs tubular turnbuckles?

I'm sure turnbuckles have failed, just as I'm sure the Dynema and lashings have failed due to chaff, UV or??? Nothing is failsafe. Personally, I've never had, not heard of a turnbuckle fail.....but then we've only at this ocean cruising thing since 1996. I'm still looking for the reason(s) why it's a change to make!. And I can see plenty of places where the chaffing/wearing would not be easily seen and could cause a major issue (ie, where the Dynema goes thru the hole at the stanchion top). Please enlighten me. We have switched from cable to Dynema halyards on both the main and the headsail, but we do take considerable care to rotate the line (reduce UV, and chaffing),switch ends, cover the spools on the mast-mounted winches(both the main and headsail are on roller reefers), etc.
sailcrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2021, 23:20   #19
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Queensland, Australia
Boat: None at present--between vessels. Ex Piver Loadstar 12.5 metres
Posts: 1,475
Re: New lifelines - open-bodied vs tubular turnbuckles?

Why use either? Use frictionless rings as dead-eyes and lace them up using light gauge dyneema or some other durable UV resisting polymer twine.
Mike Banks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2021, 07:22   #20
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 18,966
Re: New lifelines - open-bodied vs tubular turnbuckles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailcrazy View Post
I'm sure turnbuckles have failed, just as I'm sure the Dynema and lashings have failed due to chaff, UV or??? Nothing is failsafe. Personally, I've never had, not heard of a turnbuckle fail.....but then we've only at this ocean cruising thing since 1996. I'm still looking for the reason(s) why it's a change to make!. And I can see plenty of places where the chaffing/wearing would not be easily seen and could cause a major issue (ie, where the Dynema goes thru the hole at the stanchion top). Please enlighten me. We have switched from cable to Dynema halyards on both the main and the headsail, but we do take considerable care to rotate the line (reduce UV, and chaffing),switch ends, cover the spools on the mast-mounted winches(both the main and headsail are on roller reefers), etc.
You see the chafing long before it becomes a problem. That’s so nice about using rope products over stainless steel. For stainless steel you need to do dye tests etc. which is so impractical that nobody does that. With Dyneema you see fraying, you replace the lashing. When it chafes where it goes through stanchions, you see fraying right at the stanchions.
__________________
“It’s a trap!” - Admiral Ackbar.

s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2021, 07:37   #21
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,603
Re: New lifelines - open-bodied vs tubular turnbuckles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40 South View Post
I did mine in 7mm dyneema, complete with gates, 2mm dyneema lashing with 4 wraps and S/S thimbles a few months ago.

I would avoid steel cable-style thimbles and their sharp edges. They can cut ropes. Sailmaker's thimbles are a better choice. Or just thread a piece of webbing for chafe. There is no structural argument for strength use 12-stand Dyneema.


When calculating the number of passes on a lashing, use only 40-50% of the strength of the lashing lines. This is because of maldistribution of tension between the cords, I have tested this, and so have rigging makers. The efficiency is a little better using LFRs (50%) and closer to 70% using proper rigging terminators, but it is NEVER 100%. Just sayin', the lashing needs to be considerably fatter than the line.

That 8-pass 2mm Dyneema lashing will hold about 8 x 880 x 0.5 = 3500 pounds. The 7mm Dyneema will hold more than twice that. It will also degrade more rapidly due to UV because it is thin, so really, it will be only 1/3 the strength of the main line within a few years. So I would cut off the french whipping, get heavier cord, and use more passes. Sorry for the bad news, but google lashing efficiency or read the links below.



https://www.practical-sailor.com/sai...g-for-strength

https://chainsropesandanchors.co.nz/...es-what-to-use


To repeat, a lashing must be 2x line strength to be equal.
__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2021, 18:34   #22
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Boat: 1984 Passport 42 pilothouse cutter
Posts: 375
Re: New lifelines - open-bodied vs tubular turnbuckles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidhoy View Post
I'm getting ready to replace the old coated stainless steel lifelines on my boat with dyneema, and looking at the hardware I need I see there are open-bodied and tubular turnbuckles available. For standing rigging I think that open-bodied are best, but for lifelines I think it's a wash in terms of functionality. Can anyone suggest a good reason for choosing one over the other? I'm inclined to go with the tubular style for my lifelines...



Regards,

David
I changed my lifelines over to dyneema in 2013. At the time there wasn't much hardware, available and what was was expensive. I was able to reuse enough hardware to get a good working solution, without fancy turnbuckles. I used stainless thimbles and small shackles for the lashings.

To decide on turnbuckles vs lashing with frapping knot, depends on the dyneema. My lower line is 5mm dynice dux. Super strong, stiff, low stretch. I've never had to retighten, and just replace the lashing every couple years. The top line is 5/8" Amsteel. It stretches enough that I have to take off the lashing and retighten every year-2 years. I should take better notes on this stuff, but regardless it's noticeable. Maybe my stanchions are loosening which is a disturbing thought in itself. Technically I should take off the lashing once a year and move the part that's touching the thimbles...

That means a turnbuckle would have worked well for the lower line. I feel it a turnbuckle would use up all it's slack to fast with the Amstel, and you would have to re-splice that end, so my vote is lashing for Amsteel. However the lashing looks so damn nice, adds to my nautical air like a salty old sea captain. I see people look the lashings and lifelines a lot, which makes me feel like a million bucks.

The thicker upper line is awesome if you can fit it. You probably don't need 5/8" but 3/8" would work if you can swing it. Makes a comfortable easy to grab line, thinner lines don't feel as nice when used in demanding situations.

As to the why's... I can have a coil or two sitting in a locker that could replace all my lifelines or act as emergency stays or rigging, and weighs barely anything. Splices are so simple a 12 year old can do them (not saying that I would trust the splice of a 12 year old for a life line or safety item). No rust or corrosion. And that big 5/8" line is Soo much more grab-able than the wire it replaced. If price is your thing I did it at about the same cost as wire in 2013, and stuff is cheaper now. Once you have splice something like this your brain will explode from all the possibilities you can use your new splicing skills for. Look up "whoopie sling" and other tree climbing spliced slings for even more brain explosions.Click image for larger version

Name:	PXL_20210405_165226282.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	93.1 KB
ID:	239629Click image for larger version

Name:	PXL_20210405_165217507.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	72.2 KB
ID:	239630Click image for larger version

Name:	PXL_20210405_165148101.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	73.1 KB
ID:	239631
alaskanviking is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
lifelines


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The best way to attach a tubular radar reflector to a shroud. B_Hunter45 Construction, Maintenance & Refit 49 16-07-2019 15:19
Want To Buy: bronze open body turnbuckles 5/8" & 1/2" pressuredrop Classifieds Archive 2 30-09-2012 14:16
For Sale: VRLA/TUBULAR/PLANTE BATTERIES GENIKOS Classifieds Archive 0 02-06-2012 04:20
Tubular SS Bow Pulpit nial Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 0 29-11-2011 08:59
Tubular Plate (Wet) or Sealed Spiral Cell (VRLA) for House Batteries, . . . or ? Pelagic Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 20 18-02-2011 17:22

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:20.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.