I am not an
engineer, but beware of the loads placed on two attachment points, when the pull will be in the middle of those points.
For example, in building rock / ice climbing anchors, you can have a 100 lb person hanging on 1
anchor bolt or screw, which will exert about 100 lbs on that
anchor bolt. (juts hanging there, static load not dynamic load falling, which would be much greater)
If you place a 2nd anchor bolt and then attach the climber, using
rope, to both anchors, the angle of the
rope that leads to the climber is key. You have what is known as the death triangle, and if the anchors are far apart, and the rope short to the climber this will create a large pull inwards on each anchor (towards the other anchor) as well as down towards the climber.
You can end up with nearly 200 lbs exerted on each anchor from a 100 lb climber, when you only had 100 lbs on the
single anchor.
If a longer rope is used, which reduces the angle (creating a long, thinner triangle, instead of a short, wide triangle) then this force is reduced, and you end up with redundancy (2 anchors vs 1) and less force on each anchor.
Why did I write all of that? Sound like you would have the upside down version of that, where the boom pulls upwards on a fairly tight (bad angle) spectra line, which would then exert likley twice the force of the upward pull on each anchor point.
The old pipe traveller woudl have likely not passed on the same forces to the anchor points, as it would have pulled more upwards I think. The spectra will pull up and much more inwards towards the other side's anchor point. I see the need for large
backing plates.
I would personally consider
buying or having a simple replacement one made.