I've seen a few posts on this old (1995) system that is on my
Cal 30 and wonder why conversion to a
single line would be an issue without modification?
With all of my experiences with
single line, I would simply maintain tension on both
furler line and sheet as I rolled the sail out or in.
With a continuous loop
furler, it would seem that you would do the same thing but use a different "side" of the loop depending on whether your were unfurling or
furling.
If this is correct, why couldn't you just replace the loop line with a single line which would go into the drum when you were pulling on the sheet to unfurl and come out of the drum when you were
furling?
I haven't sailed this
boat yet and don't want to pull the shrink wrap for another month or so, but wanted to make plans on replacing
sheets, halyards and other control lines before launch this spring.
Anyone with a 705 or 810 care to comment? By the way, although I have seen much written to the contrary by posters here and elsewhere, the brochure for this system clearly indicates that it is not a simple furl/unfurl design but one that will allow reefing through nearly infinite sail size and shape by stopping in between.
Murph
S/V Amalia
1965
Cal 30