|
|
07-12-2012, 12:12
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bellingham
Boat: Outbound 44
Posts: 9,319
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
As Tellie said, watermakers do not work off of solar. The solar charges the batts. In reality on a cruising boat your solar amp output will probably already be spoken for, unless you have a massive solar setup. The big solar setups fit OK on cats, but are not so compatible with a mono that actually wants to sail. Most people that cruise and use a WM also use some suplemental power source besides solar.
__________________
Paul
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 12:30
|
#32
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 15,307
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by jostalli
|
It's not really the same thing.
It's using over 100A to produce 20gal. Fine if you are are running it off an alternator, but not practical from solar power or even the main engine of most sailboats.
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 12:37
|
#33
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 15,307
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul L
As Tellie said, watermakers do not work off of solar. The solar charges the batts. In reality on a cruising boat your solar amp output will probably already be spoken for, unless you have a massive solar setup. The big solar setups fit OK on cats, but are not so compatible with a mono that actually wants to sail. Most people that cruise and use a WM also use some suplemental power source besides solar.
|
That was certainly the case before the energy recovery watermakers became available. Now with cheap solar and ER watermakers many run their watermakers on solar, or solar and wind. As we do.
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 13:04
|
#34
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2012
Location: At sea somewhere in the Caribbean
Boat: Jeanneau Sun Fast 40.3
Posts: 6,574
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
When I say run it off solar, I'm aware thart it probably won't run directly off the panels. I know it will run off the batteries. By running off the panels, I guess I mean it doesn't suck more juice than the panels can replace in a reasonable amount of time. The rest of the boat also uses juice.
I guess I can start by looking at all the websites you guys ( and in this equality age - gals) have given me. Perhaps there are some good deals on e- bay, although shipping to europe sometimes is a pain.
Tellie, thanks for the input, can you tell me more?
__________________
https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=carsten...ref=nb_sb_noss
Our books have gotten 5 star reviews on Amazon. Several readers have written "I never thought I would go on a circumnavigation, but when I read these books, I was right there in the cockpit with Vinni and Carsten"
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 13:33
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bellingham
Boat: Outbound 44
Posts: 9,319
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by noelex 77
That was certainly the case before the energy recovery watermakers became available. Now with cheap solar and ER watermakers many run their watermakers on solar, or solar and wind. As we do.
|
Like I said most cruisers use suplemental power besides solar if they run a WM for all their water needs. You have a wind generator. Just cause it is overcast for a week doesn't mean you don't need to make water. Wind, genset, Honda, main engine. Solar is great. It just usually is not enough to cover a cruising boats total needs, unless it is a very big set of panels, and tbese have thier own issues.
__________________
Paul
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 13:48
|
#37
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hollywood, Fl.
Boat: FP Athena 38' Poerava
Posts: 4,027
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Actually the Crusie RO is an energy hog for a RTW crusier. The boost pump alone uses practically as many amps to feed an 115v AC powered pressure pump as the better watermakers use for the whole system. There is no near comparison in energy consumption. Rich makes a nice effort for an off the shelf components watermaker. But toting around a EU2000 to power your watermaker if you don't have a diesel generator on-board is rather silly, on a RTW trip it isn't really feasible especially since space is an issue plus now you're carrying more alternate fuel. If you do have a diesel generator on board there are still plenty of better options for AC powered watermakers. Again, I'm not knocking Richs stuff, he's a super nice guy. But if it's price point you're looking for and you just don't care about space and energy build your own or buy one of his. The savings is going to be minimal and the long term energy costs are not going to make an energy conscious sailor happy...at all.
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 14:23
|
#39
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Boat: Niagara 35
Posts: 1,878
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Not much mention of the Katadyn 40 (or 35?). Very inexpensive and has a manual back-up handle (I don't really trust electricity). Very low amp draw, but the Ah/L might be higher than the spectra. Seems to be about half the price, though!
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 14:50
|
#40
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 15,307
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul L
Like I said most cruisers use suplemental power besides solar if they run a WM for all their water needs. You have a wind generator. Just cause it is overcast for a week doesn't mean you don't need to make water. Wind, genset, Honda, main engine. Solar is great. It just usually is not enough to cover a cruising boats total needs, unless it is a very big set of panels, and tbese have thier own issues.
|
No my post was badly worded. No wind.
95% of my energy is solar alone and I make 95% of my water all year around.
Cloudy days are not a great factor as long as your average production is greater than average consumption. The battery bank will even out the difference.
Watermaking is more forgiving than other electrical demands in that on very poor power production days its easy not to run the watermaker. I run ours generally very second day, but this can varied depending on power production, water demand and the tank level.
It helps over winter that we do less swimming so there no need for several showers a day, naturally dropping our water demand.
2O AHrs a day will give you 45L a day. 20Ahrs can be produced by 50w panel in summer. In the depths of winter we need perhaps 125w on average.
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 14:58
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 260
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwyckham
Not much mention of the Katadyn 40 (or 35?). Very inexpensive and has a manual back-up handle (I don't really trust electricity). Very low amp draw, but the Ah/L might be higher than the spectra. Seems to be about half the price, though!
|
I think the 40e is too small but you really can't argue with this price for the 80e $3875 shipped: https://www.readymaderesources.com/c...6.html?ccUser=
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 15:37
|
#42
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle
Boat: Endeavour 43
Posts: 38
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
As with various boat designs meeting the needs of the owner water makers fall into various patterns of use as well. I chose the path of simplicity, no automation and the desire to have as little run time as necessary while meeting my particular needs concerning water consumption. I chose a 30 gal an HOUR – not per day – water maker from Cruise RO Water and Power. Power comes from a 750 amp battery bank using a 3000 watt Heart Inverter with a Link 2000 battery monitor. With the system running a 12 volt feeder pump to the 1HP 120 volt electric motor driving the high pressure pump @800psi it will produce 30 gallons an hour while consuming 11 amps per hour. After producing the water a simple 5 gallon fresh water flush keeps the system ready for 3 to 4 days. Now I may not use 30 gallons in 3 to 4 days but since the need to keep the system fresh merely means that instead of listening to the system run for an hour maybe I’ll only need 20 or 30 minutes of run time making water while keeping the system flushed for those 3 to 4 days. Beyond that pickling the system for extended storage takes about 20 minutes, piece of cake. Coupling the simplistic nature of the system all replacement parts are off the shelf components. This also includes the Dow Corning membranes which are standard sized off the shelf units. This equates to being a lot cheaper to replace compared to the specialty sized membranes other water makers require for their systems. In addition, product support is unsurpassed. Good luck with your project.
http://www.cruiserowaterandpower.com/
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 16:05
|
#43
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 15,307
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by sea1ljs
[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] I chose a 30 gal an HOUR – not per day – water maker from Cruise RO Water and Power. Power comes from a 750 amp battery bank using a 3000 watt Heart Inverter with a Link 2000 battery monitor. With the system running a 12 volt feeder pump to the 1HP 120 volt electric motor driving the high pressure pump @800psi it will produce 30 gallons an hour while consuming 11 amps per hour.
|
The problem if using solar and or wind to power the watermaker is that its using 2.5x the amount of energy to produce the same amount of water as one of the energy recovery watermakers.
If you have a generator, a high capacity non energy recovery watermaker works very well. It can also work if you motor a reasonable amount every few days and have a couple of large alternators.
This is why I would encourage everyone to think about how they will power the watermaker as a first step.
A high capacity, non energy recovery, watermaker powered by a generator or the main engine, or a lower capacity energy recovery watermaker powered by wind and /or solar.
Both are successful options, but the first option does not work well with solar and the second option does not work well with a generator. The cost of the first option is less, but for commercial products there is not a great deal of difference.
A large capacity energy recovery watermaker is the final option and this gives you the best of both worlds, but it is by far the most expensive option.
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 16:19
|
#44
|
cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil
Posts: 223
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by carstenb
When I say run it off solar, I'm aware thart it probably won't run directly off the panels. I know it will run off the batteries. By running off the panels, I guess I mean it doesn't suck more juice than the panels can replace in a reasonable amount of time. The rest of the boat also uses juice.
I guess I can start by looking at all the websites you guys ( and in this equality age - gals) have given me. Perhaps there are some good deals on e- bay, although shipping to europe sometimes is a pain.
Tellie, thanks for the input, can you tell me more?
|
Hi Carsten,
This company in Holland always have a few used watermakers on stock, maybe you give them a call. +31 641043727
Vlietstroom Power - Voorburg/Denhaag
CeesH
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 16:30
|
#45
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bellingham
Boat: Outbound 44
Posts: 9,319
|
Re: Which Watermaker To Choose
Quote:
Originally Posted by sea1ljs
As with various boat designs meeting the needs of the owner water makers fall into various patterns of use as well. I chose the path of simplicity, no automation and the desire to have as little run time as necessary while meeting my particular needs concerning water consumption. I chose a 30 gal an HOUR – not per day – water maker from Cruise RO Water and Power. Power comes from a 750 amp battery bank using a 3000 watt Heart Inverter with a Link 2000 battery monitor. With the system running a 12 volt feeder pump to the 1HP 120 volt electric motor driving the high pressure pump @800psi it will produce 30 gallons an hour while consuming 11 amps per hour. After producing the water a simple 5 gallon fresh water flush keeps the system ready for 3 to 4 days. Now I may not use 30 gallons in 3 to 4 days but since the need to keep the system fresh merely means that instead of listening to the system run for an hour maybe I’ll only need 20 or 30 minutes of run time making water while keeping the system flushed for those 3 to 4 days. Beyond that pickling the system for extended storage takes about 20 minutes, piece of cake. Coupling the simplistic nature of the system all replacement parts are off the shelf components. This also includes the Dow Corning membranes which are standard sized off the shelf units. This equates to being a lot cheaper to replace compared to the specialty sized membranes other water makers require for their systems. In addition, product support is unsurpassed. Good luck with your project.
http://www.cruiserowaterandpower.com/
|
You say 11amps per hour. That would have to be 11amps at 120 v. Or about 110 ah out of your 12 v bank. That's about 3.6ah per gal.
__________________
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|