My
boat was delivered with one of those incredibly noisy
Jabsco electric toilet conversions in the aft (my) heads. It worked fine until the
motor burned out. Then the replacement never worked right. It would fail to prime and fail to discharge. It drove me crazy.
I decided that these are crap, and four years ago, I bought two
Raritan Sea Era
toilet conversions, supposed to be a drop in fit.
Well, they fit the toilet bowl, but everything else was different, and I couldn't fit one of them in the forward heads. So I moved the
Jabsco to the forward (guest) heads, and installed one of the Sea Eras aft.
Four years later, they have both worked flawlessly, and used heavily over many thousands of miles and many months of
living aboard.
Today I did the first
maintenance on the Sea Era -- replaced a joker valve. Which is what made me think of this topic.
Now after this amount of experience, I'm no longer sure that the Jabsco ones are crap. This is heavier, and seemingly more heavy duty, than the very light and plasticky
Raritan. It's much noisier (two impellers vs one impeller and one
diaphragm pump) but this doesn't really bother me. The Jabsco has the advantage that you can separately drain the bowl; the Raritan has no such control. The Raritan could use such a control, as its discharge
pump is not as powerful as the Jabsco's. The Raritan also backflows disgustingly.
Why did I have that weird priming problem with the Jabsco before I moved it? I have no idea. I drove me absolutely crazy. But it disappeared after I moved it.
In general no major complaints about either these last four years, but it seems to be that neither of these is the perfect
marine toilet.
The perfect
marine toilet would be made of
bronze (like the
Skipper manual toilets). It would have superb hydraulic engineering so that it would never fail to prime, and never backflow. It would be designed to come apart easily for
service without spilling disgusting liquids all over the place. It would have powerful, high quality motors with long
service lives. It would have a switch, maybe, to allow you to select a high flow rate for direct
overboard discharge, and a lower one for
holding tank. It would, unfortunately, be expensive.