Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyFowler
Thanks for the advice everyone, although not what i was hoping for... How often it is that the worst is actually the best.
Will go the new shaft route...
Cheers!
|
I think I saw all of the posts, so if there’s one where the following question has already been asked, then my apologies.
Being conservative, I definitely would put
safety first, and not lose my prop or go broke shaft in a seaway.
But I wonder if you have an oversized (let’s say generously sized) shaft section for the size
engine?
It happens when people think bigger is better, or transplant an engine/tranny to use with existing shaft (typically resulting in undersized shaft if the idea was to increase power).
So, my point is to ask the shaft OD and engine HP and whether with the engine involved, would a smaller shaft suit? If yes, then torque shearing is less concern.
I’ll leave it to others to debate stress
corrosion, which can happen from welding, and will make it start breaking up on the welding bench.
It triggers my memories to think about chasing stress cracks with TIG, watch the cracks propagate faster than I can weld them together. Then, back off and look to see the shaft cocked over in a bend.
So, only after verifying that the full OD of the shaft is not needed to transmit the torque, would I run a shaft in that condition.
For instance, if it’s a 1” shaft, and the engine prop and
boat need 3/4”, you may reposition the shaft in the gland, or epoxy the gland running surfaces, and go ahead to run awhile longer. If so, watch the hand on the shifter to avoid shock loading going FWD-REV or vis-versa.
But, if you can get a replacement Aquamet shaft for 1/2 a day’s machine shop charges, just go new.
Money well spent on peace of mind, my $0.02
PM