Cruisers Forum

Join CruisersForum Today

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-01-2010, 12:21   #1
Registered User
SabreKai's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada on Lake Ontario
Boat: Roberts Offshore 38
Posts: 1,286
Images: 5
Ady Gil Collision - Who Did What?

I've been playing the vids over n over for the last half hour, and two things are clear.

On the vid taked from Bob Barker, in a position dead ahead of the Japanese vessel, it is obvious that the Japanese ship veered to starboard about 15 degrees as she approached Ady Gil. If she had stayed on course she would have passed Ady Gil by a small margin at the speed Ady Gil was making. After the impact the Japanese ship then veers to port about the same amount or more.

On the vid taken from the Japanese ship, the Ady Gil was making very little speed at first but then when the larger ship changed course to ram, she went to full ahead and started to accelerate for about 3-4 seconds before the impact.

The Japanese ship was obviously trying to ram, but what were they thinking on Ady Gil?

Comments, preferrably without all the political guff?


SV Sabre Dance, Roberts Offshore 38
SabreKai is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 13:05   #2
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Out there doin' it
Boat: 47' Olympic Adventure
Posts: 2,333
I don't think it's a given that the whaler was trying to ram the Ady Gil - they may have been trying for real close, but then AG sped up at the last moment (as you acknowledge). This type of incident was inevitable, imo.

Lodesman is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 13:09   #3
Registered User
Sonrisa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gabriola Island BC
Boat: 1978 Pacific Seacraft Mariah 31
Posts: 57
Here's a link to the story/video if you haven't heard of it. Japanese whaler rams and sinks protest vessel.

Jerry Cope: Ady Gil Sinks in Southern Ocean -- An Exclusive Interview With Captain Chuck Swift of the Sea Shepherd Vessel Bob Barker
Sonrisa is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 13:42   #4
Moderator Emeritus
David M's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay
Boat: research vessel
Posts: 9,844
That is a pretty misleading title. An equally accurate tile might read, "Sea Shepherd Boat Rams Whaling Vessel".

One could examine the videos until the cows come home but it is irrelevant what happened during the time that the videos were running. By the time the videos were running, both vessels had become the give way vessels under the COLREG's. So to examine the videos and then try to assign blame is an exercise in futility. Under the COLREG's both vessels became responsible for avoiding this collision long before the videos started.

We don't know and probably will never know the thought processes of the person who had the con on the Japanese vessel or on the Sea Shepherd vessel. What this means is we will never be able to establish intent by examining the videos. Do we honestly know whether or not a decision mistake at the last few seconds was made by either party? A legal mistake by both parties was made by breaking the COLREG's a while back. In fact this is what the COLREG's requires, that decisions to avoid a collision are made well in advance. Better decisions are made well in advance which creates a much larger buffer for avoiding a collision.

Feel free to speculate all you want about the collision, just keep the politics of whaling out of the discussion or the thread will be closed.

Life begins where land ends.
David M is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 13:55   #5
Registered User
paradix's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australasia
Posts: 284
David's right - we'll never know, without being in the minds of the skippers.

But just for the fun of it, my own guesses on why the Ady Gil skipper accelerated just prior to collision would be either

1. he wanted to ensure collision;

2. he was panicking, misjudged the rapidity of collision, and thought he might power into a sharp turn away in time;

3. he was panicking, wanted to get reverse thrust, but engaged forward thrust first in error.

1. is certainly plausible, given Sea Shepherd's history of repeatedly employing deliberate collision tactics between their vessels and the Japanese fleet. But I think it is unlikely, because of the position of the crew members on board Ady Gil. It does not seem to me like they were hunkered down ready for a deliberate collision. So I'm betting 2. or 3.
paradix is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 14:01   #6
Moderator Emeritus
David M's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay
Boat: research vessel
Posts: 9,844
I just noticed the other thread on the same topic has been closed....right after I made my last post. My mistake.

I think the discussion on this topic has been thoroughly exhausted anyway, besides, us mods are sick of the politics which has repeatedly been dragged into the discussion after numerous warnings.

Sorry guys, but I need to close this thread as well. Please do not start another one on the same collision.

Thanks for understanding.

Life begins where land ends.
David M is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 14:06   #7
Moderator Emeritus
Pblais's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hayes, VA
Boat: Gozzard 36
Posts: 8,700
Images: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Pblais
It's clear they provoked a fight and failed to avoid an collision. It's also clear the whalers fought back and also failed to avoid a collision. They were both obliged to do so and neither did. I'm not seeing the need to say who was more at fault matters given the scant evidence we have. We can see the videos and now it seems the need to argue about things when there is too little evidence to discuss. So once again with no real facts we have another misadventure to haunt Cruisers Forum.

but what were they thinking on Ady Gil?
Sometimes in the comics you see the little balloons coming from the mouth with words written. I didn't see any. They were probably thinking about dinner. I'm 90% sure.
Paul Blais
s/v Bright Eyes Gozzard 36
37 15.7 N 76 28.9 W
Pblais is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 16:21   #8
Boracay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pelican Bay, Great Sandy National Park
Boat: Steel Roberts Offshore 44
Posts: 5,175
Images: 18
NZ Inquiry...

As there is going to be an inquiry in New Zealand I'd be pretty sure the skipper of the Ady Gil will be making a statement.

My guess is he pushed the throttle forward to avoid an imminent collision.

Rust never sleeps
Boracay Blog.
Boracay is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Satellite Collision clausont Marine Electronics 0 17-02-2009 08:37
Coast Guard collision Fishspearit Off Topic Forum 2 03-07-2008 21:51
Whale/Container Collision chad.lawie General Sailing Forum 42 07-05-2008 15:07
Report on Subí Collision GordMay Pacific & South China Sea 5 21-10-2005 20:48

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2015 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:44.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.