|
|||||||
| Register | Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Welcome to CruisersForum.com the friendliest forum community where sailing and cruising enthusiasts meet online to exchange knowledge. Our members have contributed over 5,000 pages of information including discussions about boats, destinations, electronic equipment, book reviews, living aboard, crews wanted and so much more...
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which allows you to read most all of our content. By joining our community (For FREE) you will have access to participate in the discussions, post new topics, connect and communicate with other members, respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely FREE so please join our community today! Click Here to Register!
|
| View Poll Results: Boardings by USCG | |||
| Your nationality USA |
|
74 | 88.10% |
| Canadian |
|
6 | 7.14% |
| Other |
|
4 | 4.76% |
| Years cruising in or near US waters 0 |
|
8 | 9.52% |
| 1-2 |
|
11 | 13.10% |
| 3-5 |
|
12 | 14.29% |
| 5+ |
|
57 | 67.86% |
| Howmany times boarded 0 |
|
47 | 55.95% |
| 1-2 |
|
26 | 30.95% |
| 3-5 |
|
8 | 9.52% |
| 5+ |
|
3 | 3.57% |
| Was boarding party armed Yes |
|
26 | 30.95% |
| No |
|
7 | 8.33% |
| Have seen both |
|
6 | 7.14% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 | ||
|
Registered User
![]()
|
Quote:
I guess their is also a card in the head showing the difference between elbow and....... ![]() For foreign flagged vessels as far as I am aware they operate worldwide under the maritime rules and regulations of their own country, save where they impact outside the vessel (i.e. no pumping black water into an anchorage abroad, even if permitted at "home"). Hence the popularity of Flags of Convenience for commercial shipping. (Of course this does not make the vessel sovereign territory as sometimes thought ).Same of course applies for US vessels abroad, except less chance of a USCG inspection.
__________________
I support Baan Gerda |
||
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Registered User
![]()
|
Probable Cause?
Your vessel can be treated as a second home or cottage by Federal Tax law. Therefore, it seems that it is your castle. Then don't you wonder why the CG can board your vessel without probable cause? I understand it is under the guise of a safety inspection. However, they will stop you, a citizen, without cause as you go about your lawful business and detain you against your will. They will search your castle without a warrant. They will not allow you to schedule the safety inspection at a mutually agreed time. All seems heavy handed for a free country.
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
![]()
|
Yes it does seem a bit heavy handed, but we have choices. We can change the laws, play by their rules, or not play at all. I choose to play by their rules. Even though they, CG, slammed my boat, put holes in it, treated me as a criminal under watch of a gun, and held me captive in a corner while they went through the boat.
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | ||
|
Moderator
![]() Site Helper
|
Quote:
__________________
Paul Blais s/v Bright Eyes Gozzard 36 37 15.7 N 76 28.9 W |
||
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
![]()
|
Yes, but don't we own the government?
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Registered User
![]()
|
||
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Administrator
![]() Site Administrator
|
It is not accurate to compare the search powers of the U.S. Coast Guard (military authority) to those of peace officers (civil authority). The Coast Guard, by federal statute, has much broader authority.
Here's an interesting discussion on the topic by attorney John Wallner: Reference: Live Aboard 9605: My Boat Is My Castle: The 4th Amendment at Sea "Ever since 1946, the Coast Guard has enjoyed wide search powers on 'all navigable waters' under U.S. jurisdiction. The current text of 14 USCA s 89(a), states: The Coast Guard may make inquiries, examinations, inspections, searches, seizures, and arrests upon the high seas and waters over which the United States has jurisdiction, for the prevention, detection, and suppression of violations of laws of the United States. For such purposes, commissioned, warrant, and petty officers may at any time go on board of any vessel subject to the jurisdiction, or to the operation of any law, of the United States, address inquiries to those on board, examine the ship's documents and papers, and examine, inspect, and search the vessel and use all necessary force to compel compliance. When from such inquiries, examination, inspection, or search it appears that a breach of the laws of the United States rendering a person liable to arrest is being, or has been committed, by any person, such person shall be arrested or, if escaping to shore, shall be immediately pursued and arrested on shore, or other lawful and appropriate action shall be taken; or, if it shall appear that a breach of the laws of the United States has been committed so as to render such vessel, or the merchandise, or any part thereof, on board of, or brought into the United States by, such vessel, liable to forfeiture, or so as to render such vessel liable to a fine or penalty and if necessary to secure such fine or penalty, such vessel or such merchandise, or both, shall be seized. Along with similar Customs powers, Section 89 Coast Guard police authority has been called the "most sweeping grants of police authority ever to be written into U.S. law." [see for instance: La Fave s. 10.5(i).] Read literally, s. 89 gives the Coast Guard plenary search and seizure power over every vessel under U.S. This statute, currently broadly due to our war on drugs, gives the Coast Guard search powers over vessels that are much broader than similar search powers over cars, houses, or RV's. For instance, for a peace officer to search an RV, the PO usually does not need a warrant, but must have "probable cause" to search the vehicle. The Coast Guard, on the other hand, has statutory power to stop and search a vessel *even in the absence of probable cause that a crime is being committed*, so long as the stop was for the purpose of a 'safety and document inspection.' "
__________________
Hud s/y The Belle of Viriginia, IP 380 Nevis, West Indies |
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
![]()
|
The coast guard has always been professional and cool headed in every instance that I have dealt with them. The only time they boarded was after they asked "permission to board". I was boarded by homeland security and they were a totally differenty story, they snuck up behind us 12+ mi offshore and boarded us with guns drawn without asking questions. They harrassed and threatened and searched the boat and came up with a small amount of marijuana a passenger was carrying. They then forced us to follow them into clearwater florida where they turned me over to the pinellas county police. I took a $5000 lawyer bill to find out I was boarded illegally , was out of floridas and the united states jurisdiction , You do NOT!! have to let anyone board your boat without a search warrant. It is a right guaranteed in the constitution. They may hold you and get a search warrant but not board your boat without one. To think that they violated my constitutional rights and broke some way serious laws to harass me for someones bag of pot that was on my boat really still burns me up.
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
![]()
|
Boardings
It was a night from hell. We were fog bound, no wind and taking huge rollers on the beam. Below the cabin looked like a mix master. The DVD case opened and deposited it's contents in a closed (!!!) sock drawer on the other side of the cabin. We had just put back in the water and the seams were still swelling so the bilge was adding to the mess below. The wife was sick. The two cats were sick and I was straining to spot the channel markers off Point Loma so we could turn stern to and make that final run into the calm waters of the bay.
It was black and cold and nasty when suddenly a high speed boat roared up behind us and blinded me with a mega spot light. They did not identify themselves and I bellowed for him to turn off the @#$% spot light. "Do you know who I am?" an invisible voice shouted. "Turn off your @#$%^ spot light!" We were trying to find our turning point between the surf and kelp beds and the jetty. "What if you have a gun!" he shouted. I still had no idea who he was but from his actions I had a pretty good idea. My wife, a generally cooler head than me popped out of the companion way and shouted, "We surrender." "You are talking to a federal officer. We have to see if you have a gun." "We surrender. What do you want?" she added again. The kid continued his lecture and any hope of getting my night vision back in the next half hour was gone. "We surrender. What do you want?" she shouted again. It was after midnight but the kid finally caught on. "Where are you from and where are you going?" "Mission Bay and we're trying to get home to Coronado now turn off that light." They roared away. ICE? Homeland Security? Customs? I don't believe they ever did identify themselves but it's nice to know if the United States is ever invaded by 40 year old, wooden ketches traveling at 4 knots, armed with two sea sick cats and a fiery redhead, we'll be safe. Cheers, John & Jan SV Santa Teresa |
|
|
|
|
#40 | ||
|
Registered User
![]()
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Cdt. SGT. ![]() life is a mystery and if you try to solve it youll end up more confused than you were before!!
|
||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High Frequency Modem | Jentine | Electronics: Communications & Audio Visual | 2 | 09-05-2006 23:52 |
| Armed Boardings in Venezuela | sv_makai | Health, Safety & Related Gear | 2 | 02-12-2005 06:10 |
| Value of USCG documentation? | Wahoo Sails | Rules of the Road, Regulations & Red Tape | 15 | 10-05-2005 21:47 |
| USCG part 1 | Wahoo Sails | General Sailing Forum | 0 | 31-03-2005 18:42 |
| Frequency and Wavelength | GordMay | Electronics: Communications & Audio Visual | 0 | 29-01-2005 02:48 |