Thanks guys for not being offended by my last comment.
I hear what you are saying.
Actually I have read results of cut open dunked samples submerged in water
for 6months from can and 2pac pour with penetration at 1mm each sample and negotiable weight increase.
I could also tell everyone about other personal experiences with expanding foam but that all leads into more debates. Hopefully someone may have some chemistry experience etc in comparing the two. My hunch is the 2pac is superior. The companies making two PAC recommend cans for small areas and touch ups etc. their biggest selling feature over cans as far as marketing
goes is that for large amounts its much more controlled and cheaper. So I wonder why they don't claim how superior the product itself is over a can?
Thanks everyone and I hope I have not come off like a jerk in my last comment. I'd hate people to know what I'm really like ;-)
Sent from my iPhone
using Cruisers Sailing Forum