Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Construction, Maintenance & Refit
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

View Poll Results: Flanged vs inline? I'm comfortable with this style of valves:
Only flanged seacocks 15 62.50%
Properly installed inline valves 8 33.33%
Other (explain in comments) 1 4.17%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-03-2018, 11:39   #16
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Home port: Ft Lauderdale, Florida
Boat: VIA 42, aluminium cutter
Posts: 141
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

My mentor taught me that seacocks should be installed with a wooden backing block, shaped to the hull and that it should be hardwood, and never, ever plywood.
blueazimuth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 11:41   #17
Registered User
 
Terra Nova's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marina del Rey, California
Boat: President 43 Sportfish
Posts: 4,105
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueazimuth View Post
My mentor taught me that seacocks should be installed with a wooden backing block, shaped to the hull and that it should be hardwood, and never, ever plywood.
Solid wood can easily crack along the short grain. Quality marine ply is better (epoxy saturated). Solid glass even better.
__________________
1st rule of yachting: When a collision is unavoidable, aim for something cheap.
"whatever spare parts you bring, you'll never need"--goboatingnow
"Id rather drown than have computers take over my life."--d design
Terra Nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 12:07   #18
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Boat: O'Day 40
Posts: 1,083
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

I have had Schedule 80 grey pvc fittings 2"- 3" catastrophically break in industrial use . Those things are super thick.
Hopefully Tru Design are getting somewhere with using the material, but I'm not holding my breath.


They are as far from PVC as your hull is. They are a composite, like your hull, and just as durable. Because they are stable, they are still as easy to turn as the day they were installed.

I'm not sure what your " The thru hulls become part of your hull" means though?

The composite thru hull is epoxied to the composite hull. Can't separate, can't leak, can't corrode, no stray current issues.
__________________
Trying to make new mistakes.
bcboomer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 12:24   #19
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 600
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcboomer View Post
I have had Schedule 80 grey pvc fittings 2"- 3" catastrophically break in industrial use . Those things are super thick.
Hopefully Tru Design are getting somewhere with using the material, but I'm not holding my breath.


They are as far from PVC as your hull is. They are a composite, like your hull, and just as durable. Because they are stable, they are still as easy to turn as the day they were installed.

I'm not sure what your " The thru hulls become part of your hull" means though?

The composite thru hull is epoxied to the composite hull. Can't separate, can't leak, can't corrode, no stray current issues.
Its a storm
a battery or similar or heavier weight cuts loose
on impact the leverage enables it to break

have no doubt epoxy joints are strong
usually stronger than that of the material being joined
that doesnt make plastic valves invulnerable to damage or breakage
the only way to do that is to eliminate thru-hulls, no matter what they are
being a lower profile would help, but theyre not
__________________
'give what you get, then get gone'
ZULU40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 12:32   #20
Registered User
 
Terra Nova's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marina del Rey, California
Boat: President 43 Sportfish
Posts: 4,105
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

In the event of a fire, which would you rather have, metal or plastic thru-hulls and sea cocks?
__________________
1st rule of yachting: When a collision is unavoidable, aim for something cheap.
"whatever spare parts you bring, you'll never need"--goboatingnow
"Id rather drown than have computers take over my life."--d design
Terra Nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 12:44   #21
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Langley, WA
Boat: Nordic 44
Posts: 2,507
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terra Nova View Post
In the event of a fire, which would you rather have, metal or plastic thru-hulls and sea cocks?
Have you ever seen fiberglass burn? In the event of a fire the sea cock melting would be the least of my worries.
stormalong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 13:00   #22
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Boat: O'Day 40
Posts: 1,083
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

If the battery or whatever breaks loose the Trudesign meet the ABYC specs for a 500 lb force so it's just as likely to survive. Who knows how strong that bronze is after 10 years of various marinas with various amounts of stray current. There really isn't any way to know. My boat doesn't have any thru hull valves sharing space with large or heavy things anyway. If it did, even with bronze on a flange, I'd be looking at some kind of barrier.

When we bought our boat the surveyor condemned the bronze thru hulls based on looking at the surface condition. The galley drain was seized and I didn't dare put too much pressure for fear of breaking it off. I was nervous about them but when I took them out they were actually pretty solid.
Now I don't give them a second thought. They close and open easily and I don't worry about then rotting away. There are enough things that need attention on a boat so it's nice to have 1 less.

As far as fire is concerned, I don't think it will matter a tinker's damn whether the valve is metal if the hull is plastic.

Come to think of it, the Trudesign people did demonstrate to the local distributor how they stand up to a flame. The bulkheads, hull, deck etc will be gone before the valve leaks.
__________________
Trying to make new mistakes.
bcboomer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 13:43   #23
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Ladner, Delta, British Columbia Canada.
Boat: Coast 30
Posts: 374
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Does anyone know IF there are any other manufacturers of Marlon or glass filled plastic through hulls other than Tru-design of New Zealand, and Forespar Corporation of California? ...Who seem to love that slogan get out of the Bronze age!

My Engine space floor is 2-1/4" thick. Groco Make a 3/4" extra long bronze through hull 5.3" long. This currently seems to be My only option as Forespar have no intention to manufacture a comparable fitting and My second hand information is that Tru-design do not intend to make any until the Fall.

That seems too long to wait. It seems to me that many traditional planked vessels would have the same requirement as I have?
coastalexplorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 14:17   #24
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle
Boat: Cal 40 (sold). Still have a Hobie 20
Posts: 2,945
Images: 7
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

So they show their idea for best practice for inline valves, but the OP's link states that they don't recommend it.

I added the bold -

IN-LINE VALVE INSTALLATION
GROCO does not recommend the use of in-line valves as seacocks for these reasons:

An in-line valve has no means of attachment to the vessel hull or backing block, so the valve can turn or loosen from the thru-hull fitting with vibration or with normal use.
If the connected thru-hull fitting becomes damaged or broken, as might occur if the vessel struck a submerged or floating object, or if the fitting was inadvertently damaged or broken inside the hull, there would be no way to shut off the flow of water into the vessel.
In-line valves have NPT threads, which are not compatible with NPS threaded thru-hull fittings (unless the thru-hull fitting is machined with "Combination Thread". Installing an in-line valve onto a thru-hull fitting will create a mismatch of threads resulting in minimal thread engagement between valve and fitting, and an unsafe installation. Property damage, personal injury, or both could occur. If you choose to utilize an in-line valve as a seacock, the thru-hull fitting used must have "Combination Thread".
cal40john is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2018, 19:17   #25
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Sea of Cortez
Boat: Kelley-Peterson 46 cutter
Posts: 890
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

I found one (unused) bronze seacock with a black iron fitting that had welded itself to the bronze. I could break the soft, rotten iron with my hand. Made me look at all 13 seacocks and throughhulls.
Some I have completely eliminated. A couple were frozen and the bronze handle broke off from the effort to open or close the valve. Years of electrolysis?
Every replacement has been Marlon throughhull and Marlon seacock. No worries about electrolysis. No thoughts about the occasional blown-out throughhull from a lightning strike.
The first replaced throughhull was over 10 years ago and the seacock works easily and perfectly. I have heard a lot of bad about plastic throughhulls used above waterline for bilge or cockpit drains. But have never heard of broken or deformed Marlon.
KP44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2018, 09:08   #26
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Juneau, Alaska
Boat: Jeanneau 43DS
Posts: 337
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by cal40john View Post
GROCO does not recommend the use of in-line valves as seacocks for these reasons:
True, I saw that but it's just a whole bunch of speculation without any data backing it up. Pretty frustrating that not only does the boating community speculate about boat sinking causes without citations, but the manufacturers do too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cal40john View Post
(Groco quote):
1) An in-line valve has no means of attachment to the vessel hull or backing block, so the valve can turn or loosen from the thru-hull fitting with vibration or with normal use.
I don't see how this is an issue. The inline valve is not going to just turn itself - it has hose(s) attached which prevent full rotation. So it's never going to unscrew itself, unless the hose actually isn't secured to it, in which case you have a potential leak/flood anyway, and how is vibration loosening the valve if nothing's attached to it?

Maybe they're making the point that you could have a 1/16 turn or so which could cause a very tiny leak at the pipe threads. This just doesn't seem likely to me (the valve is very tightly screwed on) or very concerning (a tiny thread leak won't sink a boat).

Quote:
Originally Posted by cal40john View Post
(Groco quote):
2) If the connected thru-hull fitting becomes damaged or broken, as might occur if the vessel struck a submerged or floating object, or if the fitting was inadvertently damaged or broken inside the hull, there would be no way to shut off the flow of water into the vessel.
So striking a submerged object is going to destroy a bronze thruhull, but not the fiberglass hull it's bedded in? Sorry I just don't buy this. Do they have any data on it?

I see their point that if you break the fitting inside the boat it's a bit harder to stop the flow of water, but this is irrelevant unless there's actually an issue of many boats sinking due to inline valves breaking off inside the hull. Otherwise it's just speculation about something that isn't a problem.

This really seems like a concern about electrolysis, which is legitimate but is an argument for using Marelon, because both inline bronze and flanged bronze are susceptible to electrolysis.

Also saying there's no way to shut off the flow is ignoring the dozens of ways we have for dealing with an emergency hull leak - StayAfloat putty, wooden dowels, underwater epoxy, rubber bung, etc. A flanged seacock isn't a guarantee of never having that kind of issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cal40john View Post
(Groco quote):
3) In-line valves have NPT threads, which are not compatible with NPS threaded thru-hull fittings (unless the thru-hull fitting is machined with "Combination Thread". Installing an in-line valve onto a thru-hull fitting will create a mismatch of threads resulting in minimal thread engagement between valve and fitting, and an unsafe installation. Property damage, personal injury, or both could occur. If you choose to utilize an in-line valve as a seacock, the thru-hull fitting used must have "Combination Thread".
This is a valid point, although they include the counterpoint in their own point, so they're really just saying here that some people install inline valves incorrectly, and you shouldn't do that. Although it would also be great to get real world data - how many boats sink due to thread mismatch?
Tessellate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2018, 09:10   #27
Registered User
 
Terra Nova's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marina del Rey, California
Boat: President 43 Sportfish
Posts: 4,105
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Unsubscribed.
__________________
1st rule of yachting: When a collision is unavoidable, aim for something cheap.
"whatever spare parts you bring, you'll never need"--goboatingnow
"Id rather drown than have computers take over my life."--d design
Terra Nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2018, 16:54   #28
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Boot Key Harbor
Boat: Allied Mistress CC 39
Posts: 95
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

after having encountered a few frozen ball valve"seacocks "I will choose the cone style bronze sea cocks when I can find them.
Mistress Sirena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2018, 18:03   #29
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Duluth,Minnesota
Boat: Lindenberg 26 & Aloha 8.2
Posts: 1,280
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terra Nova View Post
Solid wood can easily crack along the short grain. Quality marine ply is better (epoxy saturated). Solid glass even better.
correct on all accounts
clockwork orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2018, 19:45   #30
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Boat: O'Day 40
Posts: 1,083
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistress Sirena View Post
after having encountered a few frozen ball valve"seacocks "I will choose the cone style bronze sea cocks when I can find them.
Hmm, tapered bronze that I understand require regular maintenance, lapping in, lubricating, exercising, protecting from stray current, etc, etc. Why not use Trudesign composite? No maintenance, lubrication, exercising or corrosion.
If you are looking for high maintenance why not go back to a wood hull?
__________________
Trying to make new mistakes.
bcboomer is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
hull


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flanged & Castellated Prop Nut (A Myth?) GuidoY Propellers & Drive Systems 11 29-04-2014 14:28
2-Piece Flanged Through-Hull/Value Vs. Flanged Seacock zboss Construction, Maintenance & Refit 11 02-07-2013 07:50
engine thruhull valve question with pic feltonmichael Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 12 29-04-2013 09:54
Dripping valve at AC intake thruhull StanleyCup Construction, Maintenance & Refit 16 01-08-2012 04:27
For Sale: Conbraco Apollo 3/4" Flanged Seacocks Greg S Classifieds Archive 0 28-03-2012 12:41

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:34.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.