Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Construction, Maintenance & Refit
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 27-09-2010, 09:19   #1
Registered User
 
Anzo's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: No fixed address
Boat: Hallberg-Rassy Rasmus 35 Berzerker
Posts: 137
Are Flexible Shaft Couplings Worthwhile ?

After my vendor disappeared with my shaft and prop, I'm buying the whole coupler/shaft/dripless/prop setup. The flexibles promise anti-vibration, anti electrolysis, but at some point there are still bolts that must mount from hard flange to hard flange, right? Or am I missing something? Thanks!
Anzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 09:26   #2
Registered User
 
Stillraining's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Puget Sound
Boat: Irwin 41 CC Ketch
Posts: 2,878
Go Here...scroll half way down the page.

http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...t-36940-8.html

Del is a supper guy..he will walk you through it...just ask
__________________
"Go simple, go large!".

Relationships are everything to me...everything else in life is just a tool to enhance them.
Stillraining is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 15:04   #3
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 146
One half of the coupling is mounted to one side of the driveline and the other half is mounted to the other side. Inbetween the 2 halfs is a flexible element. It transfers the force from one side to the other and allwows for some missalignment. Even when dialled in properly there is still likely to be .002 inch (2 thou ) misalignment on some plane. Also the element provides a cushion between driving forward and reversing. Plus if the prop and shaft got jammed hopefully the element would disintegrate protecting other parts of the driveline that are costly to repair or replace.
blgklr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 15:22   #4
Moderator Emeritus
 
David M's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Boat: Research vessel for a university, retired now.
Posts: 10,406
Are you talking about Drive Savers? They are fine until they break, leaving you without an engine. In my experience they break too easy. I know that's their job but I think they have them tuned to break too easy.
__________________
David

Life begins where land ends.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 15:33   #5
Registered User
 
Blue Stocking's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St. Georges, Bda
Boat: Rhodes Reliant 41ft
Posts: 4,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
Are you talking about Drive Savers? They are fine until they break, leaving you without an engine. In my experience they break too easy. I know that's their job but I think they have them tuned to break too easy.
David'
Can you give a few examples of the way in which the drivesavers failed. Not dis-believing you, but in 50yrs around boats, including building some 60-80ft workboats, I have never seem one fail.
__________________
so many projects--so little time !!
Blue Stocking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 15:38   #6
Moderator Emeritus
 
David M's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Boat: Research vessel for a university, retired now.
Posts: 10,406
I had them break on my boat twice. I stopped using them because of that. I need a reliable boat. That's the only example I have. I have two 315 Hp Cummins turbo diesels each turning 24 x 24 four bladed props with a 2:1 reduction. I did not wrap something around the prop nor run it aground either.

As far as the installation goes, the nuts were re-torqued after the break in period.

Perhaps DriveSavers are better suited to smaller engines with much less torque? I don't trust them to not blow up on me again.
__________________
David

Life begins where land ends.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 15:59   #7
Moderator and Certifiable Refitter
 
Wotname's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South of 43 S, Australia
Boat: C.L.O.D.
Posts: 20,433
Are Flexible Shaft Couplings Worthwhile ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anzo View Post
After my vendor disappeared with my shaft and prop, I'm buying the whole coupler/shaft/dripless/prop setup. The flexibles promise anti-vibration, anti electrolysis, but at some point there are still bolts that must mount from hard flange to hard flange, right? Or am I missing something? Thanks!
A couple of points.
1. As previously posted, each hard flange is bolted onto the flexible element, not right through to the other hard flange.
2. Apart from allowing for minor misalignment and providing for shock absorbing of sudden torque changes, they provide for some flexibility between a soft mounted engine and a hard mounted shaft.
__________________
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangereous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. T.E. Lawrence
Wotname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 16:14   #8
Registered User
 
delmarrey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philippines in the winters
Boat: It’s in French Polynesia now
Posts: 11,368
Images: 122
I had one of these on my Pathfinder (42 hp) motor/shaft and it did quiet down the vibration a bit and I didn't have any problems with it. PYI Inc. Max-Prop PSS Shaft Seal Seaview Radar Mounts R&D

My new Yanmar it would probably be OK but I was having other problems (shaft whip). So I've put in a thrust bearing and don't need it any more.

As far as breaking, these have two cross bars opposite sides and apposing positions that will, at least, hold it together if it were to fail. On large motors w/large props I would think they wouldn't make any difference, so I would not use them. A 300 hp motor/trany doesn't turn very fast.

BTW if you need one I have one for a yanmar with only 20 hours on it, at a reasonable price.
.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Faithful are the Wounds of a Friend, but the Kisses of the Enemy are Deceitful! ........
The measure of a man is how he navigates to a proper shore in the midst of a storm!
delmarrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 16:22   #9
Moderator Emeritus
 
David M's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Boat: Research vessel for a university, retired now.
Posts: 10,406
I'm not so sure. A 2600 RPM, 315 horsepower diesel reduced by a 2:1 transmission is still turning the shaft at 1300 RPM. When you reduce the speed by a factor of 2:1, you also double the torque, minus any losses from friction.
__________________
David

Life begins where land ends.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 16:42   #10
Registered User
 
delmarrey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philippines in the winters
Boat: It’s in French Polynesia now
Posts: 11,368
Images: 122
With my Pathfinder the shaft turned at 1500 rpm at full out speed. I doubt one would run a diesel at full speed for very long, just in short bursts. It's that first powering up that really stresses shafts. A piece of plastic in there is really going to get stressed if one were to go from fwd to rev too quickly.
__________________
Faithful are the Wounds of a Friend, but the Kisses of the Enemy are Deceitful! ........
The measure of a man is how he navigates to a proper shore in the midst of a storm!
delmarrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2010, 19:30   #11
Registered User
 
osirissail's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: A real life Zombie from FL
Boat: Gulfstar 53 - Osiris
Posts: 5,416
Images: 2
Maybe there is a max HP for the Drivesaver, but mine has been in service for 15 years on my 135hp Perkins and has saved my butt/transmission twice. The Drivesaver after one incident of super over-torque looked like a wave washer with about 1 inch of displacement. But the next morning it was back flat again and has worked fine for the last 10 years although I keep a spare in my spares locker.
osirissail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 15:22   #12
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ontario canada
Boat: grampian 26
Posts: 1,743
I would think the manufacturer would proved the horsepower rating for their product. They work really well for damping the engine pulsation at idle.
perchance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 16:15   #13
Registered User
 
Mark Johnson's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Bern NC
Boat: Searunner 34 Trimaran
Posts: 1,660
The ultimate is a CV joint with thrust bearing. It is a double universal joint with telescoping shaft inside the rubber bellows, The prop shaft is held rigidly to the thrust bearing that is connected only to the engine bed. This way the prop shaft can only rotate, not shake and move around, which the engine does freely. It mkes our PSS shaft seal work better, and if we snag a crab pot line, it could save the transmission. It also increases the life of the engine feet, as they do not take the forward thrust from the prop shaft at all, and the engine can be TOTALLY out of alignment!

We have over 15 years on this one, and love it. It is pricey... probably over a thousand bucks now... but well worth it if your boat is a keeper.
Mark
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	091_91_00.JPG
Views:	587
Size:	91.1 KB
ID:	21625  
Mark Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 01:26   #14
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia, Hervey Bay QLD
Boat: Boden 36 Triple chine long keel steel, named Nekeyah
Posts: 909
I will second Mark's comments on the CV joint setup. We have had one for 23 years and I would not be without it. Never have to worry about engine alignment , within a few degrees is fine.
When we changed from Volvo to Yanmar, just had a new connecting shaft made up.
Also makes for a very quiet installation.
Regards, Richard.
boden36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 19:49   #15
Registered User
 
delmarrey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philippines in the winters
Boat: It’s in French Polynesia now
Posts: 11,368
Images: 122
I just installed one. It seems like the best thing for Yanmars and a PSS!


.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN3797.JPG
Views:	1308
Size:	382.1 KB
ID:	21661  
__________________
Faithful are the Wounds of a Friend, but the Kisses of the Enemy are Deceitful! ........
The measure of a man is how he navigates to a proper shore in the midst of a storm!
delmarrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Worthwhile Plating the Bow? markpierce Polar Regions 17 27-10-2020 06:03
flexible shaft coupling for short shaft melemakani Propellers & Drive Systems 6 22-12-2015 05:16
Flexible Shaft Coupling SkiprJohn Propellers & Drive Systems 51 25-12-2006 06:39
Walkie (Boatie) Talkies worthwhile? Payne Marine Electronics 22 13-11-2006 13:13
photocell for masthead tri-anchor worthwhile? Catamount Construction, Maintenance & Refit 3 07-02-2006 10:44

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:17.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.