Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 17-01-2017, 09:57   #46
Registered User
 
Cotemar's Avatar

Community Sponsor

Join Date: Dec 2007
Boat: Mahe 36, Helia 44 Evo, MY 37
Posts: 5,731
Re: Poor construction

It gets even BETTER.

Boats sold in the U.S. do not have to be CE rated, but rather, must only meet a few U.S. Coast Guard regulations which address required safety items such as PFDs and flares, carrying capacity for boats under 26’ and level flotation if swamped for boats 20’ and under.

America’s version of CE Standards and Recommendations have been promulgated by the American Boat and Yacht Council -- but they are strictly voluntary. Most critically, there are no ABYC design categories to differentiate between boats of different capabilities, a crucial distinction for CE ratings and American NMMA certification, which itself only requires about 70% of the ABYC recommended standards. While most quality U.S. builders follow the ABYC standards and many exceed those required by the NMMA, they are not mandatory as the CE standards are in Europe.
Cotemar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:00   #47
smj
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2007
Boat: TRT 1200
Posts: 7,274
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotemar View Post
It gets even BETTER.

Boats sold in the U.S. do not have to be CE rated, but rather, must only meet a few U.S. Coast Guard regulations which address required safety items such as PFDs and flares, carrying capacity for boats under 26’ and level flotation if swamped for boats 20’ and under.

Hmmm, better to have no regulations and have it buyer beware, or better to have regulations that mean nothing yet make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside when you buy?


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum
smj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:02   #48
Registered User
 
Polux's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Portugal/Med
Boat: Comet 41s
Posts: 6,140
Re: WHAT CE CERTIFICATION MEANS FOR BOAT BUYERS

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Yet a category A certified boat can have brass thruhulls with a life expectancy of 5 years? Something wrong there.
They don't have a life expectancy of 5 years. If the boat will sink do to that in 5 years the boat builder is liable and that is a completely different matter.

I don't know anybody that change through hulls of new boats after 5 years. Normally they should be changed between 10 and 15 years but should be checked thoroughly once a year after the initial 5 years.
Polux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:02   #49
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 797
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotemar View Post
It gets even BETTER.

Boats sold in the U.S. do not have to be CE rated, but rather, must only meet a few U.S. Coast Guard regulations which address required safety items such as PFDs and flares, carrying capacity for boats under 26’ and level flotation if swamped for boats 20’ and under.

America’s version of CE Standards and Recommendations have been promulgated by the American Boat and Yacht Council -- but they are strictly voluntary. Most critically, there are no ABYC design categories to differentiate between boats of different capabilities, a crucial distinction for CE ratings and American NMMA certification, which itself only requires about 70% of the ABYC recommended standards. While most quality U.S. builders follow the ABYC standards and many exceed those required by the NMMA, they are not mandatory as the CE standards are in Europe.
But the US has two features that make new boats no less well equipped. 1) product liability tort + 2) insurance market "voluntary" compliance.

Like the IIHS in the automotive world, insurance companies get real world data factored for financial payout and adjust standards. Far faster and accurate.
SV DestinyAscen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:05   #50
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 797
Re: WHAT CE CERTIFICATION MEANS FOR BOAT BUYERS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polux View Post
They don't have a life expectancy of 5 years. If the boat will sink do to that in 5 years the boat builder is liable and that is a completely different matter.

I don't know anybody that change through hulls of new boats after 5 years. Normally they should be changed between 10 and 15 years but should be checked thoroughly once a year after the initial 5 years.

I think he was arguing that the standards are ****. The equivalent of minimum housing codes.

If you set your goal as the minium, it's still a **** house even if you can legally build it
SV DestinyAscen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:06   #51
Marine Service Provider

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Marmaris
Boat: FP Orana 2010, Hélia 2013, Catana C 47 2013, Nautitech 46 Fly 2018
Posts: 1,346
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by a64pilot View Post
OK so how is it determined that a boat is a Class A boat?
Is there a set of rules that determine structural limits and are there conforming articles built that are tested to these rules and have to demonstrate minimum strength, does a Certification agency show up and conduct or witness these tests etc?
How about is the boat taken out in weather that is Class A and test sailed?

Finally, 40 kts and 13', really? I have stumbled into worse than that in the Gulf of Mexico, that is all they have to take, at 14' and 41 kts, they don't have to survive?

This is not a comment about any boat manufacturer, just the Certification
100% agree.

CE certification to me doesn't mean anything, or very little to me.

Cheers

Yeloya
yeloya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:09   #52
Moderator Emeritus
 
a64pilot's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
Re: Poor construction

FWIW VW was only the last major automaker to get caught, I believe nearly all of them have cheated, and been caught in the past.
Quick Google turned this up and I think this is just recently, in the 90's I think GM had their cars turn off emissions equipment when the AC was on, and other manufacturers had theirs activated only when test conditions were met etc.
6 Vehicle Emissions Testing Scandals - How Car Makers Are Cheating Emissions Tests

VW was far from the first
a64pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:13   #53
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 797
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by a64pilot View Post
FWIW VW was only the last major automaker to get caught, I believe nearly all of them have cheated, and been caught in the past.
Quick Google turned this up and I think this is just recently, in the 90's I think GM had their cars turn off emissions equipment when the AC was on, and other manufacturers had theirs activated only when test conditions were met etc.
6 Vehicle Emissions Testing Scandals - How Car Makers Are Cheating Emissions Tests



VW was far from the first
Truth - when the compliance standard is not one that the consumer can detect or particularly care about, regulatory agencies and engineering academics are the only ones who'll do the work.

I wouldn't expect the EU CE pencil types to do better than the WVA academics curious about emissions control and discovered the fraud.
SV DestinyAscen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:14   #54
Registered User
 
Polux's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Portugal/Med
Boat: Comet 41s
Posts: 6,140
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Another point, Lagoon has balsa cored decks yet are CE certified?
There are plenty of quality monohulls with balsa core among them Dehler or Contest. Only recently Dehler is moving to closed cell core but I never heard that their past boats had problems.
Polux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 10:17   #55
smj
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2007
Boat: TRT 1200
Posts: 7,274
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polux View Post
There are plenty of quality monohulls with balsa core among them Dehler or Contest. Only recently Dehler is moving to closed cell core but I never heard that their past boats had problems.

Cotemar stated to be CE certified a boat must use divinicell in its decks as a core.


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum
smj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 11:00   #56
Registered User
 
Polux's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Portugal/Med
Boat: Comet 41s
Posts: 6,140
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Cotemar stated to be CE certified a boat must use divinicell in its decks as a core.
I was talking about hulls and he was talking about decks about FP and multihulls. I confess that I don't know if it is mandatory for multihulls but it makes sense since a sandwich with foam is lighter than one with balsa and on the multihulls bringing the CG down with the materials that are used is very important.
Polux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 11:09   #57
Marine Service Provider
 
boatpoker's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Credit, Ontario or Bahamas
Boat: Benford 38 Fantail Cruiser
Posts: 7,114
Re: Poor construction

Please show me where CE specifies type of core to be used in hull or deck.
__________________
If you're not laughing, you're not doin' it right.
boatpoker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 11:19   #58
Registered User
 
Cotemar's Avatar

Community Sponsor

Join Date: Dec 2007
Boat: Mahe 36, Helia 44 Evo, MY 37
Posts: 5,731
Re: Poor construction

There is always an alternative.

Just look on e-bay.

They always have a few of these beauties for sale, GUARANTIED to cross oceans.

For most smart cruisers that are buying a catamaran, the process starts by going to a good Production Catamaran builder that has already made hundreds of catamarans that have already crossed oceans.
.
.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	catamaran-tiki.jpg
Views:	359
Size:	254.9 KB
ID:	139744   Click image for larger version

Name:	homemade-boat-building-3.jpg
Views:	214
Size:	31.6 KB
ID:	139745  

Click image for larger version

Name:	home-made-boat-e1358965808498.jpg
Views:	180
Size:	103.0 KB
ID:	139746  
Cotemar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2017, 12:19   #59
smj
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2007
Boat: TRT 1200
Posts: 7,274
Re: Poor construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotemar View Post
There is always an alternative.

Just look on e-bay.

They always have a few of these beauties for sale, GUARANTIED to cross oceans.

For most smart cruisers that are buying a catamaran, the process starts by going to a good Production Catamaran builder that has already made hundreds of catamarans that have already crossed oceans.
.
.

Don't know if I'd say smart, but maybe sticking to their comfort zone.
smj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2017, 12:58   #60
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Helsinki (Summer); Cruising the Baltic Sea this year!
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 33,873
Re: WHAT CE CERTIFICATION MEANS FOR BOAT BUYERS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polux View Post
They don't have a life expectancy of 5 years. If the boat will sink do to that in 5 years the boat builder is liable and that is a completely different matter.

I don't know anybody that change through hulls of new boats after 5 years. Normally they should be changed between 10 and 15 years but should be checked thoroughly once a year after the initial 5 years.
The recent use of inferior brass through hulls and valves on Lagoons and other European boats is well known, Polux. And problems resulting from the dezincification of these fittings.

See for example: The dangers of CW617N European Brass Valves, skin fittings and hose tails - Boat, Yacht & Marine Surveyors

Why would the maker be liable if the boat sinks in Year 6, if the warranty is only for two years, and the standards only call for a useful life of 5 years? I doubt that it would be a problem other than PR.

This is a real problem. If I had a boat with through-hulls made of that crap, I wouldn't wait even five years to change them. I would change them immediately to bronze or DZR, as they should have been built in the first place. Plain brass has no place in underwater fittings, and this is clearly a flaw in the RCD standards.
Dockhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor Man's Watermaker ? Chrisc Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 39 08-03-2011 16:42
Poor Man's Tug markpj23 Seamanship & Boat Handling 5 20-06-2006 10:09
Percy Island TV cover piss poor Bob Norson Cruising News & Events 2 11-06-2006 12:39
Poor shifting Volvo Sail Drive Sunspot Baby Engines and Propulsion Systems 6 21-08-2005 12:22

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:43.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.