I get the feeling that most folks really don't know what they have aboard for payload, what the payload of their
multihull really is, etc. When you look at the empty weight for any
multihull, and what is included in that weight and what is not, and start adding up what you are putting aboard, it's amazing how rapidly the payload gets eaten up....... How many people here really know what their boat weighs empty.... in real life, and loaded in real life. It would be my guess that very few multihulls are operating within their rated
displacement...... ever. This is significant in terms not just of performance, but structural concerns, and bridge
deck clearance. In really rough conditions there is
danger of structural damage or failure and even breakup..... it may be a trivial issue for coastal sailors, but it's not for those who are liable to face extreme conditions at some point.
The GGR or 1968 is being "reenacted" this year, and it should remind us that the two trimarans that sailed in the 1968 GGR both suffered structural damage, and it still happens today.
By the way someone suggested no alcoholic beverages as a weight saving measure. Someone should point out that 80 proof whiskey weighs 7.5 pounds per gallon and
water weighs 8.34 pounds per gallon. Take whiskey instead of
water and save almost a pound per gallon ;-)
I've been an advocate of ice as a
battery for a long time..... Make ice while the sun shines using
solar energy. That ice will refrigerate your
food for a long time and the
refrigeration system needn't mindlessly cycle, sucking down
battery capacity. Some
marine refrigeration systems are built this way......... "cold plate" refrigeration. High gravity micro brews in cans make perfect ice cubes at well below the temp of ordinary ice, and won't rupture like lower gravity brews will. This is a high efficiency "battery" that will never wear out, and is lighter and cheaper than ordinary
batteries.
The
charts on lead acid
batteries show that the life expectancy of deep cycle batteries is based on how much energy is stored and recovered over the life of the battery. We need to look at battery life in lifetime kilowatt hours. Discharging a battery down to 20% charge as opposed to the recommended 80% does reduce the lifetime KWH of the battery, but only by about 20%. What that means is that you can carry fewer batteries / less weight, and the result will be more frequent battery replacement............ In the end the replacement cost will run about 20% higher over time, but the gain will be perhaps 25% less battery weight. The additional "benefit" will be that you will not be faced with a huge outlay to replace a large bank all at once, but a fairly manageable annual expense.
Ultimately if you are sailing in US waters, if you size your battery bank such that it will need replacement every 10 months for example, that will fall within the one year free replacement warranty of Batteries Plus for their deep cycle batteries, and one should be able to operate at virtually zero battery replacement cost.
Thus you gain both on weight savings and replacement cost.......... a win win situation!!
H.W.