Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Multihull Sailboats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

View Poll Results: Circumnavigating Cat without liferaft
Yes 21 17.36%
Depends on the Cat 20 16.53%
No way no how 80 66.12%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 16-03-2008, 09:59   #151
Marine Service Provider
 
fastcat435's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Amstelveen Netherlands
Boat: FastCat 445 Green Motion
Posts: 1,651
Images: 10
Send a message via Skype™ to fastcat435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Therapy View Post
To have your cabin flooded, decks awash, radio out (not to mention a pissed off Admiral), etc.
Then the raft does not inflate.
Boy, that would suck!
I wonder what those percentages are?
In a test done a couple of years ago , I do not remember the source but it was a British magazine 7 our of 12 did not inflate , that is food for thought !!!!
fastcat435 is offline  
Old 16-03-2008, 15:20   #152
Registered User
 
44'cruisingcat's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,398
Images: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCat View Post
Speaking as one who has made a number of passages, I would say that this is more complicated than it may seem. If you are in a race and go missing, someone will come looking for you, and have some idea of where you are. If you are in huge breaking seas, you may want the built in canopy and water ballast of a liferaft, where you can await rescue in the best available comfort and security. But if you are a cruiser, out there with no schedule to speak of in the relatively moderate seas of the tropical waters of the world, you probably want a dingy so you can rescue yourself. Obviously, a really big inflatable nylon and Hypalon dingy with a ditch bag, a lug or sprit sail rig, a sea anchor, and a canopy would be best. This question is complicated by the fact that people's trust that all was well inside that white liferaft cannister has sometimes been disappointed. In a multihull, I would concentrate on fireproofing and guaranteeing the buoyancy of the boat, and stay with it.
My argument precisely. It depends on the catamaran.
44'cruisingcat is offline  
Old 16-03-2008, 15:34   #153
Armchair Bucketeer
 
David_Old_Jersey's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,012
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastcat435 View Post
I would like to give you all the advice when the life raft is due for service to actually trow the thing in the water ( if you are lucky it will actually inflate ) and try it out for as many people as it is meant for , I have , a 4 seater with 4 people is hardly possible , if you still have to get one then always get a raft that can handle 2 extra people in other words for 4 get a 6 and for 6 get an 8.
It is almost impossible to crawl into a 4 seater weith 4 people
That's a remarkably simple (and excellent) suggestion........
David_Old_Jersey is offline  
Old 17-03-2008, 12:39   #154
Registered User
 
44'cruisingcat's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,398
Images: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Therapy View Post
To have your cabin flooded, decks awash, radio out (not to mention a pissed off Admiral), etc.
Then the raft does not inflate.
Boy, that would suck!
I wonder what those percentages are?
We did a liferaft course when I worked for Shell. The numbers involved required two liferafts to be used, and of those two, one failed to inflate. The people running the course had brought along TWO spare liferafts, just in case. To me, the fact that they had allowed for a 50% failure rate was pretty telling. That, along with the difficulty of use, and discomfort of the rafts themselves, has a lot to do with my approach - build the boat bouyant enough, and stay with it.

Use fire retardant materials as much as possible, but in the case that fails, use the dinghy.
44'cruisingcat is offline  
Old 17-03-2008, 12:51   #155
Registered User
 
Therapy's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: W Florida
Boat: Still have the 33yo Jon boat. But now a CATAMARAN. Nice little 18' Bay Cat.
Posts: 7,086
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44'cruisingcat View Post
We did a liferaft course when I worked for Shell. The numbers involved required two liferafts to be used, and of those two, one failed to inflate. The people running the course had brought along TWO spare liferafts, just in case. To me, the fact that they had allowed for a 50% failure rate was pretty telling. That, along with the difficulty of use, and discomfort of the rafts themselves, has a lot to do with my approach - build the boat bouyant enough, and stay with it.

Use fire retardant materials as much as possible, but in the case that fails, use the dinghy.







I am back to my original thought, which is what you say last.
Therapy is offline  
Old 17-03-2008, 13:36   #156
Marine Service Provider
 
fastcat435's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Amstelveen Netherlands
Boat: FastCat 445 Green Motion
Posts: 1,651
Images: 10
Send a message via Skype™ to fastcat435
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44'cruisingcat View Post
We did a liferaft course when I worked for Shell. The numbers involved required two liferafts to be used, and of those two, one failed to inflate. The people running the course had brought along TWO spare liferafts, just in case. To me, the fact that they had allowed for a 50% failure rate was pretty telling. That, along with the difficulty of use, and discomfort of the rafts themselves, has a lot to do with my approach - build the boat bouyant enough, and stay with it.

Use fire retardant materials as much as possible, but in the case that fails, use the dinghy.
This is one of them many reasons we build the FastCats with 200 % build in buoyancy and are discontinuing the use of gas on board
That way you never have to leave your cat in whatever position it may be. Safety is the best one can get on a cat and specially one that always stays afloat. Another reason for building lightweight is that we need less buoyancy.
fastcat435 is offline  
Old 17-03-2008, 17:50   #157
cruiser
 
BigCat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Everett, Washington
Posts: 765
Thumbs up Intumescent fire retardant paints

There is a kind of paint you can get that is fireproof. It costs much more than regular paint, though. Google 'intumescent fire retardant paints' Here is one result, that has a marine product: Flame Control : : Flame Retardant, Fire Resistant, Heat Resistant Coatings

BigCat is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 04:33   #158
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,439
Images: 241
Intumescent coatings are paint-like substances, which are inert at low temperatures; but which provide insulation by swelling, to present a charred layer of low thermal conductivity material at high temperatures.
When exposed to fire and/or high heat, the coating intumesces (puffs up) to form a thick, dense fire barrier. This layer reduces the surface burning characteristics of combustible materials and retards the penetration of heat to the substrate.
They are commonly applied to interior structural steel members.

I doubt that the previously-linked product is intended for application on Fibreglass substrates:
Flame Control No. 46081:
http://www.flamecontrol.com/images/d...7/PD-46081.pdf
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 10:50   #159
cruiser
 
BigCat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Everett, Washington
Posts: 765
"All interior combustible surfaces"

Gord, a number of products listed on that page say they can be put over wood, and at least one specifies that it can be put on "all interior combustible surfaces." Anyway, my point is that this category of product exists, not that this brand is the one to buy. If you have a stock boat built with standard resin you can improve your fire safety in vulnerable areas by using this class of product in vulnerable areas, such as engine rooms, galleys, battery compartments, and anywhere heavy battery cable runs. I advocate building your boat with fire retardant resin, but this option is not available to most readers of this board. In fact, I think putting this stuff in your engine rooms is a good idea, even if you have fire-retardant resin. You can paint over it with a harder, glossier paint if you like.
BigCat is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 11:05   #160
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
Boat: 44 footer
Posts: 953
Wow,

A paint on flame retardant. I'll have to get some of that!

Amazing what you learn around here.
Zach is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 11:41   #161
cruiser
 
BigCat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Everett, Washington
Posts: 765
Fire retardant product tested on fiberglass

See: Firefree 88 - Testing & assemblies for FF88, a fire resistant, intumescent coating for building materials
Firefree 88 - FF88 fire retardant and fire resistant protective safety coating for building materials

I have no connection with this company. It is a very extensive website, with very impressive customers--Boeing, BART, etc., using it on fiberglass and carbon fiber composites. It is water based, so we won't poison ourselves using it in our engine rooms. There seems to be no info on how to buy this product, so I e-mailed them.
BigCat is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 12:41   #162
Registered User
 
Nordic cat's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denmark
Boat: FP Tobago 35
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCat View Post
See: Firefree 88 - Testing & assemblies for FF88, a fire resistant, intumescent coating for building materials
Firefree 88 - FF88 fire retardant and fire resistant protective safety coating for building materials

I have no connection with this company. It is a very extensive website, with very impressive customers--Boeing, BART, etc., using it on fiberglass and carbon fiber composites. It is water based, so we won't poison ourselves using it in our engine rooms. There seems to be no info on how to buy this product, so I e-mailed them.

It ould be interesting to know the price, and weight. They specify 100sq.ft/gallon it seems to get a 10 mil dry thickness. It contains ceramic and silica fibres according to the safety sheet.

Definetely worth considering for the engine rooms and major cable runs.

Alan
Nordic cat is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 12:50   #163
cruiser
 
BigCat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Everett, Washington
Posts: 765
FF88 fire retardant paint - $315 USD for 5 gallons

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nordic cat View Post
It ould be interesting to know the price, and weight. They specify 100sq.ft/gallon it seems to get a 10 mil dry thickness. It contains ceramic and silica fibres according to the safety sheet. Definetely worth considering for the engine rooms and major cable runs. Alan
FF88 - $315 USD for 5 gallons, buy it from the company direct. They don't sell smaller quantities. There is an Australian distributor, for those down under.
BigCat is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 13:50   #164
Sponsoring Vendor

Community Sponsor

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gulf Coast FL
Boat: 1999 Hughes 30 Cat
Posts: 221
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCat View Post
FF88 - $315 USD for 5 gallons, buy it from the company direct. They don't sell smaller quantities. There is an Australian distributor, for those down under.
What do you know about the resin?
Pat Ross is offline  
Old 18-03-2008, 14:22   #165
cruiser
 
BigCat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Everett, Washington
Posts: 765
Fire retardant resin?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Ross View Post
What do you know about the resin?
What resin? Fire retardant resin? I am working on a project with Vinylester resin from Reichhold, Dion 9300-10. You add antimony dioxide or antimony trioxide to the resin if you want to gain maximum fire retardancy. www.reichhold.com/docs/bulletin/DION%20FR%209300.pdf -
BigCat is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
circumnavigation, liferaft


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zodiac issues liferaft safety warning GordMay Auxiliary Equipment & Dinghy 20 21-02-2008 00:31
Radar, liferaft or both Annabel Health, Safety & Related Gear 18 14-02-2008 13:59
Tinker Traveller/sail/liferaft sailboatescape Classifieds Archive 0 04-07-2007 09:23

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 18:38.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.