Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 19-02-2010, 07:20   #31
running down a dream
 
gonesail's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Boat: cape dory 30 MKII
Posts: 3,115
Images: 7
Send a message via Yahoo to gonesail
the only way the admiral will steer is close hauled with the boat heeled over .. that's what she calls sailing.
__________________
some of the best times of my life were spent on a boat. it just took a long time to realize it.
gonesail is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2010, 08:34   #32
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wells, Vt
Boat: 42ft Colvin Gazelle - TLA HLA
Posts: 503
You have it easy with such an admiral, gonesail, don't loose your position!
Years ago I used to race and teach racing. So much ow windward work depends on your boat, rig, sails, tide current, wave moment and other variables, even within a 'one design' class. Gennerally, my boat worked well close to the wind while my main competator's did far better off a point or two. As his would scream downwind, I had to do it on the upwind leg. During 'club champs' where it was a round robin and everyone used every boat, you had to figure out a new boat for a race. It really came down to who could figure out how to make it happen and quite a few of us learned a thing or two about our own boats by watching other's race them.
That aside, with the thread being about why some cruisers are opposed to (close) beating, it can be more comfortable, depending on conditions and length of time endured (even with the propper admiral ) to ease a point or two and not nescessarily impact your time to your destination adversely (if your destination is to windward).
ConradG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2010, 09:04   #33
Moderator Emeritus
 
Paul Elliott's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,663
Images: 4
In the last few years I've had a bit of "sailing to windward" experience -- returning to San Francisco from Hawaii a few times, and attempting to sail north from San Francisco to Seattle. This is definitely less comfortable than going downwind!

Leaving Hawaii is an exercise in VMG and sail trim. You have the tradewinds and the big tradewind swells coming in from the NW, and you are trying to head north (you've got to get around the Pacific High before turning east). Your crew probably doesn't have their sea legs yet. I typically foot off a bit to the west, which doesn't lose any VMG and makes the ride a bit softer as it brings the seas off of the bow. I also usually reef down more than necessary for a couple of days, which does slow us down, but makes everyone less miserable. We can't reduce sail too much or the waves stop us dead.

After a few days or so, the wind and seas lighten up and start moving aft. Once over the top of the high we begain aiming for San Fransicso. The winds and seas can pick up dramatically as we approach the coast (this is typically a "squash zone"), but unless things get really hairy the sailing is much more pleasant. 25-30 Kts of wind, 10-15 ft seas, but they are on the port quarter and with the boat properly trimmed the motion is quite tolerable.

Heading north to Seattle was brutal -- Wind 20-25 kts, 10-12 ft seas, both on the nose. Broad tacking angles (I could only dream of 45 degrees to the wind), and very slow VMG. White water was constantly across the decks and sloshing around in the cockpit. After a couple of days I gave in and started motorsailing, but it was still tough. I turned around before we got a third of the way. We could have made it, but the approaching weather would have compelled me to wait it out in port at Eureka, and my schedule wasn't going to tolerate any further delays. Running south, downwind in the exact same conditions was a joy! Fast, comfortable, and dry.

I guess that's why gentlemen don't sail to weather! I'll do it again if I need to...
__________________
Paul Elliott, S/V VALIS - Pacific Seacraft 44 #16 - Friday Harbor, WA
www.sailvalis.com
Paul Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2010, 09:13   #34
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wells, Vt
Boat: 42ft Colvin Gazelle - TLA HLA
Posts: 503
Good point about motoring directly into the wind. Sometimes it can be even more uncomfortable and harder on equiptment without the steadying effect of the sails. Anther good point about shcedual constraints as a variable. As with so much sailing, having alternate plans is always a good to remember.
ConradG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2010, 18:26   #35
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between the devil and the deep blue sea
Boat: a sailing boat
Posts: 20,437
Our boat sails great to winward and we love this point of sail (we have a 'koster' - something similar to a HCH, only better (;-)).

The point is, it is 1.4142 the distance and three times the time as compared with the run ... so ...

;-)
b.
barnakiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Wind Vane? Simes General Sailing Forum 36 19-01-2015 13:10
Wind Vane Only henryk Construction, Maintenance & Refit 34 04-05-2010 20:14
st50 wind p cleary Marine Electronics 2 26-02-2009 02:43
against the wind jimbim Pacific & South China Sea 9 18-11-2006 09:29
Wind genertaor irwinsailor Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 23 06-02-2006 08:54

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 22:56.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.