|
|
04-10-2016, 12:37
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Boat: 1990 Hunter Legend 37.5
Posts: 58
|
Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Can you fully replace a keel with a beamier design (or vice versa), or is there always a balance to be struck between beam and keel depth?
__________________
"One major advantage of living aboard is she can't re arrange the furniture on a whim." -Perchance
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 12:48
|
#2
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Solent, England
Boat: Moody 31
Posts: 18,398
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
You would hope that the yachts designer has done his homework and reached the best compromise. Many yachts have different keel options, this would be an interesting start point. Our bilge keels are about 600kgs heavier than the deep fin keel version, but you wouldn't know looking at the water line.
However, the one yacht (34 ft) I know which had a new cast iron keel fitted came to £7000 for the casting from the original foundry.
Pete
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 13:34
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Up the mast, looking for clean wind.
Boat: Currently Shopping, & Heavily in LUST!
Posts: 5,629
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoSoto
Can you fully replace a keel with a beamier design (or vice versa), or is there always a balance to be struck between beam and keel depth?
|
In a word, yes. Though at either end of the spectrum, the boats tend to be more extreme, as well as having a fair amount of drawbacks. And when it comes to design, the old saying is true (but for a few materials advances). In that "there's nothing (or little) which hasn't been tried before".
Spend some time at the Amateur Yacht Research Society www.AYRS.org They have info on all kinds of obscure, & unique boats & concepts, going back a looong way. And if you do much digging, you'll find things which are "new" to sailing, that were tried a century or more ago. Just look at Nat Herresoff.
__________________
The Uncommon Thing, The Hard Thing, The Important Thing (in Life): Making Promises to Yourself, And Keeping Them.
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 13:41
|
#4
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Channel Islands, CA
Boat: 1962 Columbia 29 MK 1 #37
Posts: 14,262
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Yes. I gather you are thinking of resistance to heeling. Beamier boat: initially more resistant to heeling than a skinnier deeper keel, but there is a little more to the story than that. As far as "efficient" do you mean which keeps a boat up better or which delivers faster boat? My narrow boat goes faster when heeled. A beamier boat is designed to sail best with less heel than mine. Check Marchaj's book for the graphs comparing the different designs.
https://www.amazon.com/Sail-Performa...ywords=marchaj
__________________
DL
Pythagoras
1962 Columbia 29 MKI #37
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 13:49
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hobart
Boat: Alloy Peterson 40
Posts: 3,919
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Yes, look at a catamaran. There are consequences to wide beam, no keel, means very poor or no self righting ability. You can go real skinny and deep. Not much room, heels easily. You can go narrow no keel, eg capt voss's sailing canoe Tillicum. But you lose much of your windward ability. You are always going to need some sort of centreboard or keel to make any ground to windward.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Cruisers Sailing Forum mobile app
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 14:06
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Halifax
Posts: 451
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowpetrel
But you lose much of your windward ability. You are always going to need some sort of centreboard or keel to make any ground to windward.
|
Exactly. Still an interesting physics question (perhaps!) but a keel or skeg or whatever is necessary to keep a hull moving in the direction it is pointed and not side-slipping, something an increase in beam will not fix.
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 14:12
|
#7
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Ciudad de la Misión Didacus de Alcalá en Alta California, Virreinato de Nueva España
Boat: Cal 20
Posts: 20,441
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoSoto
Can you fully replace a keel with a beamier design (or vice versa), or is there always a balance to be struck between beam and keel depth?
|
If you get wide enough you can skip the keel altogether, but then you will be sailing a scow or a catamaran.
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground you would never try to refloat it.
__________________
Num Me Vexo?
For all of your celestial navigation questions: https://navlist.net/
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground no one would think to try and refloat it.
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 14:22
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Boat: 1990 Hunter Legend 37.5
Posts: 58
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
I first posted this in the multihull thread but it got moved, so I suppose I meant this in the context of beam width of a multihull of some sort...
__________________
"One major advantage of living aboard is she can't re arrange the furniture on a whim." -Perchance
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 14:34
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Fl
Boat: Wauquiez Hood 38
Posts: 1,187
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Google initial stability and form stability.
__________________
Keth
Boat Vinyl Lettering and Graphics
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 16:07
|
#10
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Moresby,Papua New Guinea
Boat: FP Belize Maestro 43 and OPBs
Posts: 12,888
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoSoto
I first posted this in the multihull thread but it got moved, so I suppose I meant this in the context of beam width of a multihull of some sort...
|
In a monohull, a keel plays two main roles, controlling stability and leeway.
In a multihull, a keel does not contribute to stability, just to leeway.
For reducing leeway, beam width has little or no effect. Any form of keel or dagger board is the primary factor.
(Note, this is all an over simplification, but to a first approximation, it will do)
|
|
|
04-10-2016, 16:14
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Skagit City, WA
Posts: 25,453
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Yes catamaran vs mono.
__________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Broads and Boats. The rest I wasted" - Elmore Leonard
|
|
|
05-10-2016, 00:39
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,002
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
This is the basic difference between a mono and a cat.
Yes a cat won't come back up if it rolls but it's far less likely to roll and it's far less likely to sink if it does roll. In the end unless you do something stupid, it's pretty much a non-issue.
|
|
|
05-10-2016, 08:59
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St-Barthelemy Island, French West Indies
Boat: Ericson 34
Posts: 339
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoSoto
Can you fully replace a keel with a beamier design (or vice versa), or is there always a balance to be struck between beam and keel depth?
|
Back in the late seventies, when a Belgium sailor (Patrick Van God), who wrote extensively in French sailing magasines, traded his full keel, heavy displacement 40' steel sailboat for a light displacement full centerboard sailboat, he started a centerboard sailboats "fashion" in France & elsewhere. I sailed, back then for a couple of months, on my C&N 31 full keel sailboat with two French people & their children. At "anchorage", they would lift the centerboards & put the nose of their sailboat right on the beach where their 3 kids could jump & play while they went fishing with us... Real cool He also brought back to France a "new" internal layout for cruising sailboats that he learned from a DIY american sailor from the West Coast i.e. The head at the foot of the companionway & forward, an open layout with the main centerboard housing in the middle of twin passages on port with the galley & on starboard with the chart table. The centerboard housing was excellent to hold yourself whether cocking or working on the charts & since you could use both to move forward it wasn't much of a nuisance Cheers
|
|
|
05-10-2016, 09:40
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Boat: Condor Trimaran 30 foot
Posts: 1,501
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Alain, thanks for posting pics and story. Enjoyed it.
|
|
|
05-10-2016, 09:45
|
#15
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Channel Islands, CA
Boat: 1962 Columbia 29 MK 1 #37
Posts: 14,262
|
Re: Beam vs Keel Depth - Which is more Efficient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALAIN97133
Back in the late seventies, when a Belgium sailor (Patrick Van God), who wrote extensively in French sailing magasines, traded his full keel, heavy displacement 40' steel sailboat for a light displacement full centerboard sailboat, he started a centerboard sailboats "fashion" in France & elsewhere. I sailed, back then for a couple of months, on my C&N 31 full keel sailboat with two French people & their children. At "anchorage", they would lift the centerboards & put the nose of their sailboat right on the beach where their 3 kids could jump & play while they went fishing with us... Real cool He also brought back to France a "new" internal layout for cruising sailboats that he learned from a DIY american sailor from the West Coast i.e. The head at the foot of the companionway & forward, an open layout with the main centerboard housing in the middle of twin passages on port with the galley & on starboard with the chart table. The centerboard housing was excellent to hold yourself whether cocking or working on the charts & since you could use both to move forward it wasn't much of a nuisance Cheers
|
I like it! In certain areas that would be great.. or how about...
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/118/2...0204961f_z.jpg
__________________
DL
Pythagoras
1962 Columbia 29 MKI #37
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|