Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > General Sailing Forum
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-06-2014, 04:42   #511
Registered User
 
deluxe68's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona/Rhode Island
Boat: Swan 432
Posts: 820
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

Quote:
Originally Posted by goboatingnow View Post
The first series, like many racer-cruisers, and unlike cruiser- racers are designed to be competitive at handicapped racing events. Hence they are designed with very high aspect keels, shallow canoe bodies with low wetted areas and any unnecessarily weight is stripped out. The result is a vessel with very small , if almost non-existent bilges and a difficult keel connection.

In many high end vessels this was solved by interior metal grids etc, but notably even x-yachts had to abandon that in favour of carbon-fibre grids to remove weight so as to stay competitive.


Racing ability is typically what these vessels are bought and the design decisions, material, weight,costs are a typical compromise to engineer a fairly low-cost competitive racer- cruiser. In fact the compromises in the first series are more abrupt then in dedicated racers like say the Archambault A40.

Simply boiling this down to the stud diameter is misplaced. strength or durability is simply not a function of making things bigger.

dave
I would not categorize the first series as racer-cruisers, they are too heavy for that. Just look at the difference between the 34' J105 and the 36' 36.7. The J105 weighs 7,700 lbs while the 36.7 weighs 13,000. Cruising World puts the 40.7 in the Cruiser/Racer category.
deluxe68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 05:31   #512
Registered User
 
Ozbullwinkle's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Boat: Farr 44 Ocean Racer - Pit crew & backup helm.
Posts: 675
Images: 16
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

I didn't realise that the bolts are gal steel, that's a surprise.
Ozbullwinkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 05:58   #513
CLOD
 
sailorboy1's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: being planted in Jacksonville Fl
Boat: none
Posts: 20,419
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

Quote:
Originally Posted by goboatingnow View Post


This is no a failure of a series , this is a specific failure on a specific boat

you aren't going to get most haters to accept this, far as they are concerned this failure applies to every boat made by the manufacturer (way beyond a series)
__________________
Don't ask a bunch of unknown forum people if it is OK to do something on YOUR boat. It is your boat, do what you want!
sailorboy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 09:11   #514
Nearly an old salt
 
goboatingnow's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lefkas Marina ,Greece
Boat: Bavaria 36
Posts: 22,801
Images: 3
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailorboy1 View Post
you aren't going to get most haters to accept this, far as they are concerned this failure applies to every boat made by the manufacturer (way beyond a series)

I know, I find singling out mass production boats , especially European ones, somewhat bizarre. All manufacturers have good and poor models , som emote suited to specific activities then others etc,

Is it something to do with not having any sail boats and everyone being in small sports boats or something

dave
__________________
Interested in smart boat technology, networking and all things tech
goboatingnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 09:39   #515
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Boat: SAnta Cruz 27
Posts: 6,753
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozbullwinkle View Post
I didn't realise that the bolts are gal steel, that's a surprise.
They're not--Bene uses gal steel bolts with their cast iron keels, but the First 40.7 has a lead keel with SS bolts.
donradcliffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 10:37   #516
Registered User
 
Cavalier's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Boat: Beneteau 461 47'
Posts: 927
Images: 1
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

Quote:
Originally Posted by donradcliffe View Post
They're not--Bene uses gal steel bolts with their cast iron keels, but the First 40.7 has a lead keel with SS bolts.
..actually, their cast-iron keels use thread-inserts. I called and asked them! SS 18-8 bolts are typically used for all keels, see Beneteau keel-assembly guidelines:
http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...ml#post1554208
__________________
"By day the hot sun fermented us; and we were dizzied by the beating wind. At night we were stained by dew, and shamed into pettiness by the innumerable silences of stars."
Cavalier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 14:00   #517
Registered User
 
transmitterdan's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Boat: Valiant 42
Posts: 6,008
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

Thanks for sorting that out. It must have been another thread I read of a keel held on with galvanized bolts. Sorry for the diversion...
transmitterdan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 15:32   #518
Registered User
 
DumnMad's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Nelson NZ; boat in Coffs Harbour
Boat: 45ft Ketch
Posts: 1,559
Re: UK yacht Cheeki Rafiki missing in mid-Atlantic

Quote:
Originally Posted by goboatingnow View Post
The bolts on the first are either M22 or M20. To suggest that they should be M60 or M80 is quite ridiculous , there isn't enough material across the Keel for that

Many 1000s of first have been made in various guises. The vast majority are fine and many have many bruising deep sea races to their credit.

In my view , cheeki was an old boat, very very extensively raced, it's was in effect 3 to 4 times it's real age, I suspect there either existing damage, incorrectly refitted keel or so e combination of pre-existing damage. It was unfortunate that the 4 men in question happened to be the ones to be there when the time ran out.


This is no a failure of a series , this is a specific failure on a specific boat


Dave


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Agreed. Fatigue failure of some bolts, followed by concentration of loading on remaining bolts in a small area, then hull ripped out.
ss bolts under cyclic loading need to be replaced just like hard-worked stainless rigging has limited lifespan.
Problem is its very hard to know when the time is up. Boats never raced or out in stormy weather would be safe even at twice the age.
DumnMad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
yacht


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rafiki 37 Cored hull? SKG56 Monohull Sailboats 2 11-02-2013 06:39
Slocum 37, Rafiki 37 performance... vtcapo Monohull Sailboats 6 25-06-2012 13:03
Do You Think a Windvane Could Work on this Rafiki ? ShayW Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 8 16-09-2011 12:13
Any Rafiki Owners / Lovers Out There ? Aussie_Sequoia Monohull Sailboats 2 16-09-2011 09:00
Crew Available: Mid-February to Mid-March, 2010 solmaniac Crew Archives 0 01-02-2010 15:32

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:48.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.