Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-08-2018, 17:39   #106
KTP
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 405
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

For me it is not so much green ideals (the batteries have a detrimental effect on the environment although lead acid does have a very high recycle rate). It is:

1) quiet

2) cleaner (no oil or fuel),

3) allows access to parts of the PS34 that I just can't get to at 6'7" (this would not be a problem for a 4'9" sailor though)

4) provides a huge battery bank when you do not need to motor (say you are on the hook for a week) In this way you will be able to utilize more of your solar production and not need to run a engine to charge batteries.

#4 is a good point. Even if we had stuck with the diesel, we would have wanted a much bigger bank than the two group 31 batteries the boat had equipped. Probably I would have at least bumped that up to four.

Will have to see if range is a deal killer. If it turns out we end up wanting to motor all the time then might be wise to just switch to a power boat.
KTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 08:55   #107
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Ontario
Boat: Ontario 38 / Douglas 32 Mk II
Posts: 3,250
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTP View Post
Will have to see if range is a deal killer. If it turns out we end up wanting to motor all the time then might be wise to just switch to a power boat.
Wait a minute!

You’re new to cruising sailboats????

You don’t know if you will want to motor the PS 34 with a dead diesel you just purchased, but you are changing to electric propulsion, and trying to convince others it’s a good idea, providing an “expert” evaluation of battery technology?
ramblinrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 09:07   #108
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Some of your goals make sense, some not so much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTP View Post
For me it is not so much green ideals (the batteries have a detrimental effect on the environment although lead acid does have a very high recycle rate). It is:

1) quiet

Yes

2) cleaner (no oil or fuel),

Unless you need a generator for charging then you're back to oil and fuel.

3) allows access to parts of the PS34 that I just can't get to at 6'7" (this would not be a problem for a 4'9" sailor though)

On of the reasons I would like to go electric if it made sense otherwise.

4) provides a huge battery bank when you do not need to motor (say you are on the hook for a week) In this way you will be able to utilize more of your solar production and not need to run a engine to charge batteries.

This is where it doesn't make sense. I've kept my boat off the grid for weeks including a large fridge/freezer without a "huge" battery bank. I have 6 X 6 V GC32 golf cart batteries, total 620-0640 amp hours and that's more than enough. Also if you have a huge battery bank you
will probably end up chronically undercharging it (unless you are frequently on shore power with a similarly huge and expensive charger) leading to early death of an expensive bank.


#4 is a good point. Even if we had stuck with the diesel, we would have wanted a much bigger bank than the two group 31 batteries the boat had equipped. Probably I would have at least bumped that up to four.

Will have to see if range is a deal killer. If it turns out we end up wanting to motor all the time then might be wise to just switch to a power boat.

If you never cruise the ICW, any river or canal and are willing to wait sometimes days on a passage with no wind, frequently willing to take much longer to get from here to there, then range isn't an issue.
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 10:11   #109
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Ontario
Boat: Ontario 38 / Douglas 32 Mk II
Posts: 3,250
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipmac View Post
Some of your goals make sense, some not so much.
Next thing you know we’ll hear the plans are to sail the North West Passage, Great Loop, and Panama Canal, but we’re not sure if we’ll actually motor a lot.

All I can say is, the title had the words “realistic” and “non-BS”.

Please don’t wreck a perfectly good PS34 on a whim, because you have an electrical background.

So do I. Wouldn’t consider this for one second. It’s almost blasphemous if not ridiculous.

There are people out there who would love this boat, as she was meant to be, by the very intelligent people who designed and built her, and would take good care of her.
ramblinrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 12:07   #110
KTP
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 405
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblinrod View Post
Next thing you know we’ll hear the plans are to sail the North West Passage, Great Loop, and Panama Canal, but we’re not sure if we’ll actually motor a lot.

All I can say is, the title had the words “realistic” and “non-BS”.

Please don’t wreck a perfectly good PS34 on a whim, because you have an electrical background.

So do I. Wouldn’t consider this for one second. It’s almost blasphemous if not ridiculous.

There are people out there who would love this boat, as she was meant to be, by the very intelligent people who designed and built her, and would take good care of her.
First, it was not a perfectly good PS34. It was a poorly maintained PS34 that we are slowly bringing back to decent condition. I really don't get why people think it is so crazy to try out electric when the option to go back to diesel is always there. Everything about this boat is old. 28 year old engine, 28 year old fuel tank, 28 year old hoses (well some of the hoses might be newer).

If we had purchased a $380,000 2018 PS34 and then ripped out the engine, that might be a bit crazy. Wanting to try out electric and see if it fits our style of laid back cruising in the Puget Sound doesn't seem insane when we have a boat with the motor already removed.

Really I got this same argument when we built our own RV. "It won't work. It will leak. You will give up and it will be unfinished"

We ended up with a system of RV pods which have a solid continuous aluminum roof with no holes (so nothing to caulk and leak), the ability to quickly load or remove the pods from the truck, and we have a four season RV with 2 inches of polyisocyanurate insulation, solar powered air conditioning (1700 watts of solar). Heck, our garage pod holds two motorcycles, two bikes AND has a work bench built in with a cnc milling machine on it. The main living pod has a queen size sleep number air mattress, EIGHT feet of headroom. The whole RV is only 27 feet long and we pull a 17 foot Montgomery sailboat with it and launched it over 20 times with the RV on our last 12,000 mile across the USA trip.

So I know a thing or two because I have done a thing or two.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0230_zpsb2ct0nza.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	99.9 KB
ID:	174843  
KTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 23:45   #111
Registered User
 
CatNewBee's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2017
Boat: Lagoon 400S2
Posts: 3,755
Images: 3
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by john61ct View Post
I don't know anyone doing EP for financial/practical reasons.

Usually stems from green ideals, and willing to pay lots more and lose a certain amount of practical functionality towards that end.

Often not quite realizing just how much.
I am not a greeree, I was going for LFP and Solar nor to save the planet or save energy, but only for practical reason.

First, I do not want to search for propane and fitting bottles in remor places,
second, I want to use any appliance as at home while cruising, third, I do not want to fill up diesel for 1000€ every few weeks to run the genny end eventually get my tanks contaminated or half filled with water.

while now underway, I really enjoy full batteries in the evening, with navigating, cooking, baking, runni g the washing machine and the watermaker, and alco cooling down the master cabin for a good sleep.

Have not run the generator once yet.

It was not cheap, solar plus LFP, plus BMS, plus Inverter, installation material, galley appliances summ up to 15k€, but for a relaxed quiet live a board, it is worth every penny.
__________________
Lagoon 400S2 refit for cruising: LiFeYPO4, solar and electric galley...
CatNewBee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 00:07   #112
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,002
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTP View Post
It would IMO need a rebuild to be reliable but I would never completely trust that since I don't trust mechanics all that much (they work under a time clock).
But you are going to trust an electric drivetrain installed by mechanics that are working under a time clock to install a system that doesn't have anywhere near the number of installations to work out the bugs...

Huh?
valhalla360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 00:26   #113
Registered User
 
CatNewBee's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2017
Boat: Lagoon 400S2
Posts: 3,755
Images: 3
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Propulsion is a different beast, you need more energy and your life may depend on it in a storm and lee shore there is very little solar, and your wing gen will help bring the vessel faster to the riff then providing enough energy to go out...
__________________
Lagoon 400S2 refit for cruising: LiFeYPO4, solar and electric galley...
CatNewBee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 02:19   #114
Registered User
 
GrowleyMonster's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Orleans
Boat: Bruce Roberts 44 Ofshore
Posts: 2,863
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by valhalla360 View Post
But you are going to trust an electric drivetrain installed by mechanics that are working under a time clock to install a system that doesn't have anywhere near the number of installations to work out the bugs...

Huh?

I am convinced by my own experience that the best way to install electric drive, if you are willing to do your homework and learn a bit about it, is to DIY. I suspect it is the same with solar. Letcha know in a few months how that works out.
__________________
GrowleyMonster
1979 Bruce Roberts Offshore 44, BRUTE FORCE
GrowleyMonster is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 04:31   #115
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,002
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrowleyMonster View Post
I am convinced by my own experience that the best way to install electric drive, if you are willing to do your homework and learn a bit about it, is to DIY. I suspect it is the same with solar. Letcha know in a few months how that works out.
I was responding to a comment that implied the poster was going to pay someone to do the work but that paid help was incompetent.

If we are talking DIY, it's not rocket science to rebuild a small diesel with a little basic mechanical aptitude and a little homework.

If anything I would expect a "professionally" installed electric system would be even worse than a diesel "professionally" installed...because there aren't a lot of professionals dealing with electric and they may be cobbling together pieces and parts that don't work well together.
valhalla360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 04:37   #116
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,317
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by CatNewBee View Post
I am not a greeree, I was going for LFP and Solar nor to save the planet or save energy, but only for practical reason.

First, I do not want to search for propane and fitting bottles in remor places,
second, I want to use any appliance as at home while cruising, third, I do not want to fill up diesel for 1000€ every few weeks to run the genny end eventually get my tanks contaminated or half filled with water.

while now underway, I really enjoy full batteries in the evening, with navigating, cooking, baking, runni g the washing machine and the watermaker, and alco cooling down the master cabin for a good sleep.

Have not run the generator once yet.

It was not cheap, solar plus LFP, plus BMS, plus Inverter, installation material, galley appliances summ up to 15k€, but for a relaxed quiet live a board, it is worth every penny.
None of which has to do with Electrical Propulsion without fossil fuel generation.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 05:23   #117
Registered User
 
ranger58sb's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Maryland, USA
Boat: 58' Sedan Bridge
Posts: 5,438
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by CatNewBee View Post
I do not want to fill up diesel for 1000€ every few weeks to run the genny end eventually get my tanks contaminated or half filled with water.

That would be about as much diesel as we use all season long... with twin 450-hp mains plus genset.

Are you someplace where contaminated diesel would be likely? I haven't encountered that... in some 40 years of this. Usually it'd be an easy fix, anyway...

-Chris
__________________
Chesapeake Bay, USA.
ranger58sb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 07:46   #118
KTP
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 405
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by valhalla360 View Post
But you are going to trust an electric drivetrain installed by mechanics that are working under a time clock to install a system that doesn't have anywhere near the number of installations to work out the bugs...

Huh?
Well obviously we are going to install the system ourselves (I am a EE). I do get what you are saying, that I could rebuild the diesel myself and know everything was done correctly.

I am not interested in rebuilding diesel engines though. I like tinkering with electrics.

As for getting off a lee shore in a storm, how about either not getting into that situation by being aware of the weather or knowing how to use the sails to get you to a better safer place?
KTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 08:04   #119
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Ontario
Boat: Ontario 38 / Douglas 32 Mk II
Posts: 3,250
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTP View Post
Well obviously we are going to install the system ourselves (I am a EE). I do get what you are saying, that I could rebuild the diesel myself and know everything was done correctly.

I am not interested in rebuilding diesel engines though. I like tinkering with electrics.

As for getting off a lee shore in a storm, how about either not getting into that situation by being aware of the weather or knowing how to use the sails to get you to a better safer place?
You obviously know better with all of your Montgomery 17 and RV experience than all of the experienced cruisers here telling you DON’T DO IT.

If you were wrecking a standard high volume production boat, I could care less, but IMHO you are ruining a classy little cruiser for the sole reason that you like to tinker with electrical stuff. There were only so many PS34s built, and now you are taking one off the market for anyone who knows anything about cruising sailboats.

It’s your boat, I’ve said my piece. I realize you are not obligated to listen, but I wish you would.
ramblinrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2018, 12:10   #120
KTP
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 405
Re: Realistic non-bs comparison of lithium to lead

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblinrod View Post
You obviously know better with all of your Montgomery 17 and RV experience than all of the experienced cruisers here telling you DON’T DO IT.
There are extremely few experienced cruisers on here who know anything about electric propulsion. Quite a few though who seem to be overly reliant on their diesel engines though. Wonder what they do in the odd event the engine fails on them...

Anyway I started this thread to try and get a feel for how people thought lithium technology was stacking up against lead acid in real world non lab conditions. I was/am on the fence about lithium vs lead acid although I like the energy density of some lithium tech more than others (the Torqeedo 5000wh 48v battery is around 150wh/kg vs 40wh/kg lead acid). Somehow it devolved into a debate on electric vs diesel.
KTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lithium Ion Breakthrough - forgetful-scientists-accidentally-quadruple-lithium-ion-ba zboss Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 8 22-08-2015 23:35
Lithium costs: comparison and sanity check? ranger58sb Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 30 24-03-2015 18:06
Lead keel vertical cracks in lead Secondwave Construction, Maintenance & Refit 4 21-05-2013 08:50
Registering / Documenting Boat Located in Greece-non-EU boat, non-EU Skipper usgreek Rules of the Road, Regulations & Red Tape 8 13-03-2012 19:17
Is a modern day "Dove" realistic? mitch_connor General Sailing Forum 40 15-03-2008 16:55

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 18:05.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.