Cruisers Forum
 


Join CruisersForum Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 24-10-2005, 06:59   #1
Moderator Emeritus
 
GordMay's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 31,580
Images: 240
Lighting Tutorial

Basic Lighting Tutorial ~ page 1

Let me apologize, in advance, for any inadvertent errors, and the many known or unknown omissions in the following paper. This is a highly complex subject, encompassing a number of demanding disciplines - and it’s been a long time since I’ve studied the subject.

In order to better understand how and why we see things as we do, and apply this knowledge to lighting design, a little background about the physics of light, and the physiology of human vision will be useful.

1. Light Energy - what is light?
2. How we see.
3. Light & Colour
4. Quantity of Light
5. Applied Lighting

1. Light Energy:

Light is electromagnetic energy. The electromagnetic spectrum is very large, extending from Gamma & X-rays (one hundredth of a nanometer), to Infrared & Radio waves (one meter & above). The visible spectrum (to humans) of light (visible light - red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet), to which the human eye is sensitive, lies in the wavelengths between around 380 nanometers (short-wave, blues) and 780 nanometers (long-wave, reds); with a middle range (yellow-greens) between. The sensitivity of the eye falls off at the extremities, so 400 nm to 700 nm is a good practical approximation.

The lower frequency long waves have a lower amount of energy (1eV) , and the shorter wave high frequencies have a higher amount of energy (5 eV) . The visible spectrum has energies ranging between 1.8 to 3.1 electron Volts (eV).

These light waves can be reflected, absorbed, or transmitted. Visually Solid objects will Reflect light, and Transparent objects will Transmit light through them. An object that Absorbs all light (no reflection nor transmittal) would be Invisible. The color that we perceive an object to be, is determined by the particular wavelengths of light which are absorbed or reflected by the object. Only the reflected wavelengths reach our eye, and are seen as colour.

Colour is the attribute of visual experience that can be described as having quantitatively specifiable dimensions of hue, saturation, and brightness.

Ie: The leaves of most common plants absorb red, orange, blue & violetlight, and at the same time, they reflect the green wavelengths - and are therefore seen to be green in color. These characteristics of the object are referred to as its spectral reflectance.

2. How we See - Vision & the Eye:

The human eye has a simple two element lens. The cornea is the outer element, and the lens is the inner element. The amount of light entering the eye is controlled by the iris which lies in between the two. The light passes through a clear gel called the vitreous humor and creates an inverted image on the retina at the back of the eyeball .

The retina is the light sensitive part of the eye. Its surface is coated with millions of photoreceptors. These photoreceptors sense the light, and pass electrical signals indicating its presence through the optic nerve to stimulate the brain. There are two types of photoreceptors, Rods and Cones.

There are approximately 6 - 7 million Cones in our retinas, and they are sensitive to Colours, in a wide range of brightness. There are three different types of cone receptors, which are variously sensitive to short, medium and long wavelengths.
Different light sensitive pigments, within each of these three types, responds to different wavelengths of light. Red cones are most stimulated by light in the red-yellow spectrum. Green cones are most stimulated by light in the yellow-green spectrum. Blue cones are most stimulated by light in the blue violet spectrum. This phenomena describes the Spectral Sensitivity of the eye.

Additionally, we have approximately 110 - 130 million Rods on the retina, which are sensitive to brightness (illuminance), and are used in dim light. Rods are monochromatic, which is why, in dim light, we only see in black and white.

Although there are upwards of 120 million receptors in our eye, there are only some 800,000 fibres in the optic nerve connecting the eye to the brain. The connections cannot, therefore, be simple, and the amount of information sent to the brain for interpretation is huge. The optic nerves cross at the optic chiasma, where all signals from the right sides of the two retinas are sent to the right half of the brain, and all signals from the left, to the left half of the brain. Each half of the brain gets half a picture. This ensures that loss of an eye does not disable the visual system.
And you though you had problems interfacing your electronics...


3. Light & Colour:


The "color" of light sources is derived from a complicated relationship derived from a number of different measurements, including Correlated Color Temperature (CCT), Color Rendering Index (CRI), and Spectral Distribution. In general, colour is most readily described by a combination of CCT and CRI.

White light, from the sun, contains all the possible color variations. Yet, the human eye can only respond to certain colors and wavelengths, and not everyone perceives (sees) the same colors, or exact same shades of a color. When we see, light from the outside world is focused by our lens onto our retinal rods & cones.

Correlated Colour Temperature (CCT) is defined as the absolute temperature (expressed in degrees Kelvin) of a theoretical black body whose chromaticity most nearly resembles that of the light source. As a piece of metal (a theoretical Blackbody) is heated, it changes color from reddish to orange to yellowish to white to bluish-white. In practice, most light sources do not duplicate the energy distribution of a black body radiator, so the term correlated colour temperature is used to mean the colour temperature that most closely resembles the light source in question.

While in reality the colour of light is determined by how much each point on the spectral curve contributes to its output, the result can still be summarized on a linear “temperature” scale. The CCT rating is an indication of how "warm" or "cool" the light source appears. Paradoxically, the higher the “K” number (temperature), the cooler the lamp colour will appear. The lower the “K” number, the warmer the lamp colour will appear.

When we say a lamp has a Colour Temperature of 3000 Kelvins, it means a glowing metal at 3000 Kelvins would produce light of about the same color as the lamp. If instead, the metal is heated to 4100 Kelvins, it will produce a much whiter light. Direct sunlight corresponds to about 5300 Kelvins while daylight, which has the blue from the sky mixed in, is typically 6000 Kelvins or above. A standard incandescent lamp has a filament at 2700 Kelvins, and therefore (by definition) a Colour Temperature of 2700 Kelvins.

The Colour Temperature of a light source defines its "whiteness", its yellowness or blueness, its warmth or coolness. It does not define how natural or unnatural the colors of objects will appear when lighted by the source. Two colors of lamps can have the same Colour Temperature, but render colours very differently. Low colour temperatures imply warmer (more yellow/red) light, while high color temperatures imply a colder (more blue) light.

Daylight:
Skylight is the light we perceive when looking away from the sun at the sky. Sunlight is the light observed when looking directly at the sun (don’t do this).

Daylight may be thought of as a combination of skylight and sunlight. Daylight varies from a rather low colour temperature near dawn, and a higher one during the mid-day. A colour temperature of 6,500 K, is taken to represent “standard” daylight.

Sunlight and skylight differ in appearance. On a clear day when the sun is overhead, sunlight has an even distribution of all wavelengths, appearing whitish (5000 - 5500 K). As the afternoon progresses, it becomes increasingly yellow, then, depending on atmospheric conditions, orange, and finally, just before sunset, red (1800K).

Skylight ranges from very pale blue to deep blue. The purity and saturation of the blue is influenced by atmospheric moisture, dust and pollution. Generally speaking, the sky is palest when the atmosphere is humid or laden with dust, and it’s deepest blue when the air is dry and free of pollutants. This corresponds to colour temperatures of about 6500 K to well over 20,000 K, respectively, the higher Kelvin temperatures indicating predomination of the blue-violet wavelengths. The colour quality of the sky also varies with latitude, partly because different latitudes have correspondingly different weather patterns. Countries with drier air tend to have deeper blue skies; those with more atmospheric moisture tend to have paler skies.

Light Sources:

The colour temperature of light sources (lamps) makes them visually "warm," "neutral" or "cool" light sources.

Lamps with a lower colour temperature (3500K or less) have a warm or red-yellow/orangish-white appearance. The light is saturated in red and orange wavelengths, bringing out warmer object colours such as red and orange more richly.

Lamps with a mid-range colour temperature (3500K to 4000K) have a neutral or white appearance. The light is more balanced in its colour wavelengths.

Lamps with a higher colour temperature (4000K or higher) have a cool or bluish-white appearance. Summer sunlight has a very cool appearance at about 5500K. The light is saturated in green and blue wavelengths, bringing out cooler object colours such as green and blue more richly.

Some typical color temperatures:
1600-1850 K Candlelight
2650 K 40 W incandescent lamp
2700-3000K ‘Deluxe Warm White’ Fluorescent
3000 K 200 W incandescent lamp
2000-3200 K Natural Sunrise/sunset
3000-3200 K ‘Warm White’ Fluorescent Lamp
3400 K Tungsten lamp
3400-3500 K 1 hour from dusk/dawn
5000-6500 K Xenon lamp/light arc
5000-6500 K ‘Day-lite’ Fluorescent Lamp
5500 K Natural Noon - Sunny daylight around noon
5500-5600 K Electronic photo flash
6000-8000 K Overcast sky - shade
10,000 K Horticultural Lamps
9000-12000 K Blue sky
28,000 K North sky

How Light Affects the Colors of Objects:
Color rendering index (CRI) is a system derived from visual experiments. It assesses the impact of different light sources on the perceived color of objects and surfaces. The first step is to determine the color temperature of the light source being rated. Next, each of eight standard color samples is illuminated—first by the light source and then by a light from a blackbody matched to the same color temperature. If none of the samples changes in color appearance, the light source is given a CRI rating of 100. Any changes in color appearance which do occur result in a lower rating. The CRI decreases as the average change in the color appearance of the eight samples increases. Any CRI rating of 80 or above is normally considered high and indicates that the source has good color properties.

[/u]Colour Rendering Index[/u] (CRI or Ra) is a numeric indication of a lamp’s ability to render individual colours accurately, relative to a standard. The CRI value is derived from a comparison of the lamp’s Spectral Distribution to the standard (e.g. a black body or the daytime sky) at the same colour temperature.

The highest CRI attainable is 100. Typical cool white fluorescent lamps have a CRI of 62. Lamps having rare-earth phosphors are available with a CRI of 80 and above. Technically, CRI's can only be compared for sources that have the same Colour Temperatures. However, as a general rule "The Higher The Better"; light sources with high (80-100) CRI's tend to make people and things look better than light sources with lower CRI's.


Spectral Energy Distribution

When we look at a light source, the eye "perceives" a single colour. In reality, we are seeing literally thousands of colors and hues made up of a combination of different wavelengths of light. These different combinations and the relative intensity of various wavelengths of light are used to determine the CRI of a light source.

Spectral Power Distribution (SPD) Curves provide detailed plot of relative power emitted in the different regions of the spectrum. They show the radiant power emitted by the source, at each wavelength or band of wavelengths, over the visible region (380 to 760 nm). Such a plot, with color shadings to indicate the colours corresponding to the different wavelengths, is very useful in providing a visual feel for the colour balance in a lamp. In general, continuous spectra or very full-line spectra produce less distortion of object coloors than a few discrete lines.

- Incandescent Lamps and Natural Daylight produce smooth, continuous spectra.

- High Intensity Discharge Lamps (HID) produce light in discrete lines or bands (used in spectral analysis to identify or fingerprint the material producing the light).

- Fluorescent Lamps produce a combined spectrum - a continuous or broad spectra from their phosphor, plus the line spectra of the mercury discharge.


Chromaticity Diagram:

The C.I.E. (Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, the International Commission on Colour) diagram is based on the idea that mixing varying proportions of three hypothetical primaries (not necessarily red green and blue) can create the sensation in the human observer, of any colour of light. The three "primary" colours are dubbed "X," "Y," and "Z." If we are merely concerned about colour and not about brightness, we can specify just the relative strengths of these three colours, denoted by x, y and z. Since x + y + z must add up to 1 (i.e. 100%) just providing x and y is sufficient to specify lamp colour; the z value is implied. Lamp colour can then be represented on a two-dimensional plot of x and y. All possible colours then fall under a "guitar-pick" shaped triangle in which the perimeter encompasses spectrally pure colours (seen in nature only in rainbows and prisms) ranging from red to blue. Moving toward the center "dilutes" the colour until it ultimately becomes "white". Specifying the x,y coordinates locates a colour on the colour triangle.

Warm vs. Cool
Some people find it confusing that low colour temperature light sources are called “warm” while those with higher temperatures are referred to as “cool.” In fact, these descriptions have nothing to do with the temperature of the blackbody radiator but refer to the way color groups are perceived - the psychological impact of lighting. Colours and light sources from the blue end of the spectrum are referred to as cool, and those toward the red/ orange/yellow side of the spectrum are described as warm.

In Summary (CCT & CRI):
Color temperature and CRI provide some helpful information, but they are not perfect. Color temperature, for instance, fails to indicate anything about how a given light source will render colors. For example, imagine two “cool” light sources with similar color temperatures and color appearances. Suppose light source A produces fairly uniform energy, Suppose light source B, which looks the same, produces a similar spectrum except with almost no light in the red. Red objects which appear natural under light source A will therefore look dull and colorless under light source B even though both lights have the same color temperature.

In general, a high CRI figure means a light source will render colors well. However, since CRI figures are calculated for light sources of a specific color temperature, it is not valid to compare a 2700K, 82 CRI light source to one of 3500K, 85 CRI. In addition, remember that CRI is an average of eight different colors. This means that a light source with a high CRI will tend to render the broad range of colors well, but it is not a guarantee that any specific color will appear natural. Used in conjunction, however, color temperature and CRI can provide excellent benchmarks for the comparison of light sources.

Each element absorbs light of a particular frequency—a particular color.
the attributes of color — which are: the amount of green-or-red, the amount of blue-or-yellow, and the brightness. Note that these attributes are opposites, like hot and cold. Color nerves sense green or red — but never both; and blue or yellow — but never both. Thus, we never see bluish-yellows or reddish-green. The opposition of these colors forms the basis of color vision.


Colour Adaptation:

Sources used for general lighting will gradually shift in appearance to become "white" to the viewer, whether they are yellow/white like incandescent, or Lucalox® high pressure sodium lamps - or, blue/white like daylight. Within reason, the human color vision process tends to compensate or fill in for those colors lacking in the spectrum: red in the case of daylight, blue for incandescent, etc.

The eye's previous state of adaptation is also a factor. A warm environment will look even warmer to the occupants if they enter it from a cold, bluish space. It will look cooler if they have been in a yellowish or pinkish one. Then the eye slowly adapts until the space appears to be lighted with "white" light - no matter what the eye was adapted to previously.


Psychology of Colour:

There is no "best" colour lamp nor is there any formal definition of "true" colour. Each spectral distribution "distorts" object colors compared to another, whether the light comes from a natural source such as sunshine, north skylight, sunset, or electric sources such as incandescent, fluorescent and HID. The "right" colour source for a given application depends on personal preferences, custom and, to a very large extent, an evaluation of the tradeoffs in efficiency, cost, and colour rendition.

Certain colours are believed to have behavior-altering capabilities. Some colours or combinations of them irritate eyes and cause headaches. For example, bright yellows (either on walls or as the background on a computer screen) are the most bothersome colours, and are not calming or relaxing in any way. Bright colours reflect more light, so yellow over-stimulates our eyes, causing strain and even irritability.

Other colours can alter how or what we eat. Blue is known to curb appetites. Why is this so? Blue food doesn't exist in nature, with the exception of the blueberry. There are no blue vegetables, and hopefully, if you encountered a blue meat, you certainly wouldn't eat it. Because of this natural colour deficiency, there is no automatic appetite response to anything blue.

There are colours that can put us in a better mood, too. Green is the most restful colour for the eye. It has the power to soothe and comfort. Studies have even shown that people who work in surroundings that are green experience fewer headaches, stomach aches, and other signs of sickness or fatigue.

When people are asked about their colour preferences, there is a great disparity of opinion, but weighted averages of the responses rank the colours in the order:
blue, red, green, violet (purple), orange, and yellow, for both sexes.
Youth generally prefers warmer colours, maturity generally cooler ones.

Psycological or Physiological?
All of the senses are involved in consciousness and perception, and there are interesting connections between them. It has recently been reported that sound causes vision to become more acute. Faint lights were more reliably perceived when their appearance was preceded by a sound. (Univ. of California at San Diego, as reported in Nature in October 2000).


Full Spectrum Lighting ~ Myth or Magic?

The term full-spectrum was coined in the 1960s by photobiologist Dr. John Ott to describe electric light sources that simulate the visible and ultraviolet (UV) spectrum of natural light. There are now dozens of electric lighting products marketed as full-spectrum, some promising that they closely simulate daylight and can therefore provide benefits such as better visibility, improved health, and greater productivity. The term full-spectrum is not a technical term, but rather a marketing term, implying a smooth and continuous spectral power distribution (SPD) without the spikes and troughs in radiant energy common with most discharge light sources (e.g., fluorescent and metal halide). Full-spectrum products are usually marketed as electric light sources that emulate natural daylight; the explicit (or implicit) message is that "natural" daylight is always better than "artificial" electric light. Some full-spectrum light sources are also marketed as emitting ultraviolet (UV) radiation, as well as visible light.

The following analysis is based upon information generated by the NLPIP (National Lighting Product Information Program), the NRC (National Research Centre of Canada), and numerous other Academic research - and, I believe, represents the best unbiased information available.

Full-spectrum light sources and color perception:
Full-spectrum light sources will probably provide excellent color rendering. Color rendering index (CRI) values for full-spectrum lighting sources are typically greater than 90. Color is a human perception constructed from the combination of the spectral power distribution (SPD) of the light source, the spectral reflectance of the materials being illuminated, and the tri-chromatic nature of the human visual system. If there are gaps or large variations in the SPD of a light source, there is a potential for confusion between the apparent colors of objects. Since full-spectrum light sources usually provide radiant power throughout the visible spectrum, subtle differences in the spectral reflectance characteristics of different objects are discernable. So, when color identification is part of the visual task, such as for graphic arts, museums and color printing applications, full-spectrum light sources will ensure good color discrimination.

Full-spectrum light sources and visual performance:
Full-spectrum light sources will not provide better visual performance than other light sources under most circumstances. Visual performance is the speed and accuracy of processing achromatic information (e.g., black print on white paper) by the human visual system. For instance, at the relatively high light levels typically found in schools and offices, visual performance is essentially unaffected by the spectral power distribution of the light source, so full-spectrum light sources are, lumen for lumen, no better than any other light source.

Lighting produced by full-spectrum lamps may be, however, perceived as providing brighter architectural spaces than other lamps. Three factors may contribute to this effect. First, full-spectrum light sources typically have a high correlated color temperature (CCT) of 5000K - 7500K. Lamps with higher CCT values produce greater brightness perception than lamps with lower CCT of the same luminance. Second, most full-spectrum light sources have high color rendering properties, meaning that surface colors will appear more saturated. Greater saturation will also give the impression of greater brightness. Third, the ultraviolet (UV) radiation produced by some full-spectrum fluorescent lamps has a fluorescing, brightening effect on textiles and paper that have been treated with whitening agents. These combined effects on brightness perception may indeed have positive impact on building occupants, but greater perceived brightness can also be a liability, depending upon the expectations of the space's occupants.

Full-spectrum light sources and health:
Full-spectrum light sources will not provide better health than most other electric light sources. Recent research has shown that human daily activities are strongly influenced by the solar light/dark cycle. The most notable of these daily, or circadian, cycles is the sleep/wake cycle; but other activities including mental awareness, mood, and perhaps even the effectiveness of the immune system go through regular daily patterns. Light is the most important environmental stimulus for regulating these circadian cycles and synchronizing them to the solar day. Short wavelength (blue) light is particularly effective at regulating the circadian system; long wavelength (red) light is apparently inconsequential to the circadian system. Thus, to maximize efficiency in affecting the circadian system, a light source should not mimic a full spectrum, but instead should maximize only short wavelengths. Even if a full-spectrum light source includes short wavelength light in its spectrum, it will not necessarily ensure proper circadian regulation because, in addition, the proper intensity, timing, and duration of the light exposure are all equally important for satisfactory circadian regulation.

Light therapy treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) usually involves regulated exposure to a white light source, commonly 10,000 lux at the eye for 30 minutes per day. Any white light source will be effective at these levels, so full-spectrum light source is in no way special for treatment of SAD.

Full-spectrum light sources have no demonstrable benefit for dental health. These claims have no scientific merit.

Full-spectrum light sources and psychological benefits:
Full-spectrum light sources may have psychological benefits, particularly in societies that place value on "natural" environments. One of the claims often associated with full-spectrum light sources is that they are most like natural daylight. Unlike full-spectrum electric light sources, however, daylight does not have a fixed spectrum. Rather, natural light varies with latitude, time of day, season, cloud cover, air pollution, ground reflectance, and, if a person is indoors, window tinting. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that people consistently prefer natural lighting from windows and skylights to electrical lights. These preferences are robust and may reflect psychological associations with the natural environment that produce positive affect in many people. Positive affect induced by daylight may, in fact, help improve mood and motivation and thus increase productivity and retail sales. Full-spectrum light sources offer this positive association with daylight. Although positive psychological benefits from full-spectrum light sources may have been observed in some circumstances, there appears to be no biophysical explanation for those observations. Still, the power of psychological associations (“placebo” effect) cannot be denied, and it is certainly conceivable that cleverly marketed full-spectrum light sources may provide beneficial effects to some people susceptible to that marketing. There appears to be a strong positive association with full-spectrum light sources that has resulted from marketing, presumably because of the association between full-spectrum lighting and "natural" light.

UV:
Some full-spectrum fluorescent lamps are promoted as producing ultraviolet (UV) radiation. This is peculiar, since in general, UV radiation should be avoided. UV radiation fades and deteriorates architectural materials and works of art. Even though full-spectrum lamps might improve the color appearance of artwork, museums specifically require all radiation shorter than 400 nm to be filtered completely from light sources illuminating environmentally sensitive pieces, such as watercolor paintings, and historical artifacts. Except in certain unusual cases, it is also undesirable for people to expose the eye or the skin to UV radiation. Adverse effects of excessive UV radiation include sunburn (erythema), cataracts, and skin cancer. Several organizations, including the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA), the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), have specified acceptable limits for occupational ultraviolet exposure (IESNA, 1996; ACGIH, 1991; NIOSH, 1972).

However, skin exposure to a fairly narrow band of UV radiation, UVB between 290 and 315 nm, can promote the synthesis of vitamin D, which is necessary for proper bone development and maintenance. However, dietary sources of vitamin D, including dairy and fish products, provide sufficient vitamin D to have eliminated the incidence of bone-related problems such as rickets, in modern society. These dietary supplements therefore minimize the importance of UVB radiation exposure for most people.

Full-spectrum fluorescent lamps that produce UV radiation use special phosphors with peak emissions in the UVA band (315 nm-400 nm), typically at 355 nm. Although the relative amount of UV radiation emitted by these lamps may be the same as a particular phase of daylight, the absolute amount of UV radiation they emit is quite small. For comparison, approximately 22 minutes of sunlight exposure near midday will produce 1.5 minimal erythema doses (MEDs) of UVB radiation exposure, enough to induce a pronounced temporary increase in vitamin D concentration. One MED is the amount of exposure that produces noticeable skin redness, so the exposure needed to affect vitamin D levels is substantial. Based upon the published data from one manufacturer of fluorescent lamps emulating the UVB content of daylight, it would take at least 30 hours of constant exposure to these lamps when operated at ceiling height to provide 1.5 MEDs. Based on UVB intensity data from another study (Ball, 2002), eight hours in an office or classroom under a claimed full-spectrum lamp will produce a smaller ultraviolet dose than one minute spent outdoors in bright sunlight.

Indoor environments such as offices and schools further reduce UV exposure because most lighting fixtures and architectural materials absorb UV radiation. UVB radiation that does not strike the skin directly is unlikely to reflect off objects, floors, and walls back to the skin. The resulting exposure level will be well below the threshold for measurable vitamin D production. Therefore, fluorescent lamps claiming to emulate the relative UV content in daylight can be disregarded as a viable source of UVB radiation for humans. Since there are no known benefits to human health from UVA radiation, it can be further concluded that the modest amounts of UV radiation produced by these lamps have no beneficial impact on human health.

Ironically, even small but constant amounts of UV (UVA and UVB) radiation will eventually degrade a wide variety of architectural materials such as carpet and cloth, wood products, and printed matter.

One claim occasionally cited as a benefit of fluorescent light sources emulating the UV content of daylight is the enhanced brightness of paper and clothing treated with whitening agents. Fluorescent whitening agents are used to counteract the otherwise yellow appearance of paper and cloth, making them appear whiter and brighter.

To assess this claim, NLPIP* compared the relative luminance of white paper and of white cloth illuminated alternately by two fluorescent lamps of identical correlated color temperature (CCT), one claiming to emulate the relative UV content of daylight and one without the UV phosphor. By causing the whitening in the cloth or paper to fluoresce, the UV radiation from these lamps should produce higher luminance for the same given illuminance. Indeed, the measured luminance of a white paper sample and of a white cloth sample were 1.7% and 2.3% higher, respectively, when illuminated by the full-spectrum fluorescent lamp with more UV radiation. These effects were also perceptible when alternatively viewed, but any assumed benefits of these relatively small brightness-enhancing effects have never been documented. It should also be noted that lamps emulating the UV content of daylight have about 30% to 40% lower lamp efficacy (lumens per watt) than conventional fluorescent lamps of the same CCT, partly because additional electric power is required to generate the invisible UV radiation.

In summary, there are no known beneficial health effects from the UV radiation generated from these lamps, but the UV radiation from these lamps can be harmful to many of the materials commonly found in architectural spaces. Further, although the UV radiation generated from these lamps can induce relatively higher luminance in white paper and clothing, the loss in lamp efficacy needed to produce the invisible UV radiation is substantially greater than the fluorescence-induced luminance resulting from UV radiation.

Other than potential damaging effects on architectural materials from full-spectrum light sources that produce ultraviolet (UV) radiation, the primary disadvantages of full-spectrum lamps are economic. Full-spectrum lamps are often priced several times higher than conventional lamps. For example, a four-foot T12 lamp may cost between $1.25 and $3.60, while a full-spectrum four-foot T12 lamp may cost $14.90.

* National Lighting Product Information Program (NLPIP), at the Lighting Research Center of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

***E. & O. E. ***

Under construction:
- “Quantity of Light” (illuminance, brightness, glare, contrast, etc ...)
- “Applications” (specific light sources & their use)
__________________

__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 08:49   #2
Moderator Emeritus
 
Pblais's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hayes, VA
Boat: Gozzard 36
Posts: 8,700
Images: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Pblais
That sounds great. I have always wanted to know how to make it.
__________________

__________________
Paul Blais
s/v Bright Eyes Gozzard 36
37 15.7 N 76 28.9 W
Pblais is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 15:19   #3
cruiser

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,525
Re: Lighting Tutorial

Quote:
GordMay once whispered in the wind:
Reserved for a Basic Lighting Tutorial, coming soon ...
What a TEASE!

I am looking at installing Xenon lighting (or some type of recessed lights) this winter. Can't wait for the tutorial.
__________________
ssullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 18:21   #4
Moderator Emeritus
 
GordMay's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 31,580
Images: 240
You're rushing me here. I wanted to organize my thoughts into a coherent tutorial, covering most of what you need to know. This will take some time (I'm not very smart, but I do know a little about this subject).

Low-wattage Xenon lighting is not very efficient, at between 10 - 25 Lumens per Watt, tho' it runs cooler than Halogen (similar LPW).

Basic Lamp Efficacy Comparisons:
Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamps (CCFL): up to 80 Lumens Per Watt.
Compact Fluorescent: 40- 60 LPW
White LEDs: up to 25 LPW
Halogen & Xenon: 15-18 LPW
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 19:32   #5
Kai Nui
Guest

Posts: n/a
No rush GORD, but you can't keep us in the dark too much longer.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 20:14   #6
cruiser

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,525
Talking

ha ha ha... funny Kai Nui.

Gord... no rush intended. Just a figure of speach. I am looking forward to the info. I'm sure it will be a great addition to the forum, as always.
__________________
ssullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 21:18   #7
Kai Nui
Guest

Posts: n/a
GORD, while you are at it, I would like to know how the LED reading lights do with the yellow diodes in the mix. I am getting close to wiring my trimaran. Also, I have been asked the question, and believed the answer to be no, but with LED technology going where it is, what about an LED Strobe?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2005, 05:56   #8
Moderator Emeritus
 
GordMay's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 31,580
Images: 240
KAI NUI:
Please don’t hold your breath expecting any detailed evaluation of the latest LED lighting developments (Yellow diodes, Strobed LEDs), as I’m way out of date on this rapidly evolving technology. I will, however, address LED Lighting, in a more general fashion.

Installment 1: LED's generally make better task lights (ie: reading) than they do ambient lights. More later ...

Don Klipstein has an excellent website, with lots of current LED Lighting information:
Don Klipstein's Web Site: http://members.misty.com/don/index.html
Don Klipstein's Lighting Info Site: http://members.misty.com/don/light.html

HTH,
Gord
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2005, 20:05   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle area (Bremerton)
Boat: C&C Landfall 39 center cockpit "Anahita"
Posts: 1,076
Images: 6
LED lights

I've been specifying LEDs for years now, mostly for instrumentation annunciation. Later I began evaluating them for illumination in energy starved environments. Gord, if we can agree on terminology, I would stipulate unequivocably that LEDs are VERY efficient when driven at currents very much lower than their rated lumen outputs. This is where annunciation is the best suited task for LEds. For example, there are red LEDs designed to operate at a rated 20 mA with "X" number of lumens. What is interesting is that in dark envorinments they must be "throttled down" to around 100 micro-Amps in order to not appear to be too "bright". At that drive level the number of lumens per micro-
Amp is not specified yet compared to anything else it is quite efficient, WAY more than the efficiency at 20 mA.

None of the other LED colors are that efficient, though, and red is not conducive to reading regardless of the military use of red light to prevent night vision degradation. For reading, white LEDs are better than the other colors in that they can be driven at lower levels than other colors to give the same "equivalent" readability. Keep in mind that readability, especially with "older eyes" is often related to pupilation of the eye. In general, one has better close depth perception with whith LED light than with other colors. As a general evaluation, I believe that it takes WAY more light of amber, green, blue, or red to adequately read a chart than it does with low levels of white light and, therefore, white LEDs are more efficient when driven at the minimimim reading level than other colors of LEDs.

Strobed LEDs can generate more lumens when driven at about 5 times their continuous ratings yet the resulting non-linear efficiency is terrible at those levels and the lifetimes suffer as well. That is why flashlights are not using strobed LEDs in that the battery life is terrible and that is what we are striving for in that case.

Do not look for masthead strobes to be white strobed LEDs as they have no chance of competing with ordinary Xenon strobe lights for either efficiency, price, or output light power. Similarly do not look for proliferation of cluster white LEDs to happen when they are NOWHERE close to either compact flourescent or CCFL lamps, especially those which are color balanced to appear like daylight (another question regarding all flourescent lamp purchases because the color can be quite varied depending upon a designed application) in efficiency. The only advantage for the white LED cluster lamps is being compact. That, in addition to the fact that red, green, and amber LEDs are way more efficent than white ones, is why break lights, turn signal lamps and intersection lamps are moving to LEDs. Regardless, LEDs are not, in general, very efficient even though they are much better than incandescent lamps of any variety because ALL incandescent lamps produce more infra-red energy (which we cannot see yet feel as heat) than visible energy.

So, I conclude that LEDs make better ambient lights, like foot traffic safety illumination, than what Gord refers to as "task" illumination which must be much more precisely specified for reading value (unless we just are not using mutually agreeable terminology, which I may be guilty of).
__________________
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2005, 20:54   #10
Kai Nui
Guest

Posts: n/a
GORD, By your response, I am guessing you have not got your speakers hooked up yet
On my show, I keep everything simple and in plain language. I do this because that is how I like things.
Dr Rick, Thanks for the info on the strobe. As for the reading light, your explaination was very concise around the point, but what I was asking about is very specific. Currently there is an LED "reading light" on the market. It is billed as a more natural light, and better for reading as a result of the introduction of amber LED's into the cluster of white LED's. I was hoping to hear from the perspective of someone who has sat down under one of these lights and read a book. (By the way GORD, just food for fodder, if LED's are on the menu)
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2005, 11:00   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle area (Bremerton)
Boat: C&C Landfall 39 center cockpit "Anahita"
Posts: 1,076
Images: 6
White LED reading lights

Kai Nui,

Although there is a variation in the spectra between the white LEDs on the market those chosen for reading lights more closely simulate daylight specta to the human eye than other lights (other than very expensive color balanced incandescent photography-type lighting and affordable chosen compact flourescent and CCFL lamps).

I have done lab work using the amber LEDs with white as well. I believe that you should take the white/amber reading light combination advertisement with a grain of salt. Adding the amber shifts the spectra towards yellow (duh!) which more closely simulates what most people are "naturally" used to with incandescent lights, not outside "natural" light at midday.

I have noticed that using white LED light for reading requires a good diffuser on the lamp otherwise there will not be a uniform intensity over the illuminated area. This is much easier to do with those small reflector quartz halogen lamps than it is to do with LEDs. So, if you have a uniform illumination spread you will at first feel that the white LED light appars to be "harsher" than incandescent light, almost all of which is color shifted towards yellow as mentioned already, and that is why. After some time of use I noticed that I can lower the intensity of the source (which translates to lower power consumption) and my old eyes still retain an ability to discern detail much better than can be done with incandescent sources, including high intensity incandescent sources. In fact, if I am looking through a magnifying glass to inspect a circuit board I can see the detail that I am seeking by turning on an LED flashlight to illuminate the area of the pcb when I am working in the lab (which has "good" light already).

Using dimmers to lower the light of any incandescent bulb shifts the color towards the red making the overall result very yellow. Dimming compact flourescent sources, CCFL and all colors of LEDs does not shift the color. So, when an incandescent bulb flashlight battery gets low and the light gets dim you get a compounded effect at a loss of ability to discern detail. When the battery of a white LED flashlight gets low the light output is less yet you only have to get closer to what you are trying to see to still discern detail.

In conclusion, I would recommend that a yellow/white LED lamp is not necessarily a good thing....try to get used to the white without the yellow and you will discover that you no longer like to tolerate those incandescent sources because you can't really see as well with them. Now I am familiar with the problem of harsh flourescent sources that can give people headaches but those are not color correct for "daylight" simulation.
__________________
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2005, 22:47   #12
Kai Nui
Guest

Posts: n/a
Thanks Rick, Very consice, and TO the point. AND... You take a ribbing well
What you say makes sense, and as I get older, and the eyes just need a bit more light, I am much more aware of lighting needs. I have dealt with a number of commercial lighting setups, from a need for full spectrum lighting in paint booths, to redesigning warehouse lighting to reduce power consumption. All this knowledge is interesting, but of little or no use when designing lighting for my boat.
So again. Thank you for the relevent answer.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2005, 14:25   #13
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle area (Bremerton)
Boat: C&C Landfall 39 center cockpit "Anahita"
Posts: 1,076
Images: 6
Lighting tutorial

Excellent Gord, exceeded my expectations!

I am looking at an ad for CFL bulbs and there are three: Sunlight (DuraBright);bright white (DuraBright);natural light supplement (Ott-Lite). Some of the "cheap" CFL bulbs that I have bought are just too yellow for my taste, regardless of power rating and, when compared to the incandescent bulbe which I am replacing, are just not acceptable.

Now, it might appear, that any of the three advertised ones will satisfy my "taste" for white light I just cannot make an intelligent buying decision. I feel compelled to buy all three merely to find out for myself which one to buy more of, darn!

Because of the lack of conformity in marketing specifications we just don't know what we are getting (yet, or maybe never?). Thanks to Gord's presentation I have no desire for much of a UV content and merely want the white without the yellow (sounds like a soap ad).

Anyone with experience with various brands of the CFL and CCFL I would like to read comments from. Thanks!
__________________

__________________
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
lighting

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pactor Tutorial - Ham E-Mail GordMay Marine Electronics 0 10-07-2004 04:59
Lightning Protection Stede Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 5 20-11-2003 18:27



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:50.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.