Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-03-2019, 21:43   #16
CF Adviser
 
Pelagic's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Boat: Van Helleman Schooner 65ft StarGazer
Posts: 10,280
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Quote:
Originally Posted by andreas.mehlin View Post
Well...
When talking about 12v panels, they don't put out 12v....more something around 18v. So if you would assume a 200w panel put out 100% (which it more or less NEVER does), it would be something around 11A.
Just to clarify using my Specs for 4 of these panels connected in parallel
Click image for larger version

Name:	1 Sunpower 327 Specs.jpg
Views:	165
Size:	82.3 KB
ID:	187335
My rated output voltage Vmpp is 54.7v and current is 5.98A
The NOCT DATA is even more conservative
So what is my risk?
Pelagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 21:52   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 133
Images: 1
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Some panels put out considerably more than 12 volts. Sunpower 360 watt panels have an open circuit voltage of close to 70 volts, for example, which is stepped down by the MPPT controller to 12V or 24V depending on boat system, with a corresponding increase in amperage.

I've been told by those more experienced than myself that brass terminals are rated only to 48 volts. It's difficult to find a cut-off switch for voltages (ignoring amps for a moment) greater than 48V DC to install between the MPPT and the panels.

I was shipped a breaker from Amazon, supposedly a Blue Seas circuit breaker and 80V DC rated, but when it arrived, the sticker on the breaker indicated it was not rated to 80V DC and the placard in the box said 48V DC max.

Had I installed it, I believe it would have been a potential fire hazard, or worse. Heads up.
__________________
Yellowjacket
Yellowjacket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 22:43   #18
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Boat: Island Packet 40
Posts: 6,459
Images: 7
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

It's the amps which are the killers, you can generate an awful lot of heat shorting out 12V.
RaymondR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 23:58   #19
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 133
Images: 1
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondR View Post
It's the amps which are the killers, you can generate an awful lot of heat shorting out 12V.
I thought so too, and they are, but exceeding the design DC voltage of kill switches and circuit breaklers is also a hazard, so I've been told. But I'll let the more knowledgeable weigh in.
__________________
Yellowjacket
Yellowjacket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 00:43   #20
CF Adviser
 
Pelagic's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Boat: Van Helleman Schooner 65ft StarGazer
Posts: 10,280
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowjacket View Post
Some panels put out considerably more than 12 volts. Sunpower 360 watt panels have an open circuit voltage of close to 70 volts, for example, which is stepped down by the MPPT controller to 12V or 24V depending on boat system, with a corresponding increase in amperage.

I've been told by those more experienced than myself that brass terminals are rated only to 48 volts. It's difficult to find a cut-off switch for voltages (ignoring amps for a moment) greater than 48V DC to install between the MPPT and the panels.

I was shipped a breaker from Amazon, supposedly a Blue Seas circuit breaker and 80V DC rated, but when it arrived, the sticker on the breaker indicated it was not rated to 80V DC and the placard in the box said 48V DC max.

Had I installed it, I believe it would have been a potential fire hazard, or worse. Heads up.
When calculating the wiring and breakers for my 4 x Sunpower 327, this is what was reviewed with a Solar consultant

SUNPOWER pv is
327wp x 4 = 1308watts
vmp - 54.7 vdc. voc - 64.9vdv
imp - 5.98a isc - 6.46a

@ parallel Connection 54.7@ 25.84a(isc).
25.84a x 1.56 = 40a
80a mppt x 1.25=100a or (125a available @ the market).

BREAKERS recommended Between panel and mppt
Suntree rated @ 40a vdc
Mppt and Battery
Tomzn rated @ 125a vdc.

Which I installed
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG20170302135649-1.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	55.9 KB
ID:	187347
Pelagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 00:50   #21
Registered User
 
clownfishsydney's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sydney, Australia
Boat: Lightwave 38' Catamaran - now sold
Posts: 558
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

I had a controller short out and melt but did not catch fire. Poor design with positive and negative wires entering the controller very close to each other and no way to totally isolate from the other to protect movement and/or wear from vibration.
__________________
Michael
Formerly of Catlypso - Web Site
Lightwave 38' cat
clownfishsydney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 05:07   #22
CLOD
 
sailorboy1's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: being planted in Jacksonville Fl
Boat: none
Posts: 20,419
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

solar is like any other power source and system

size the wires and connections properly for low voltage drop to reduce heat

I sizzed mine for less than a 3% voltage drop at max current (which it rarely sees) and have a fuse at the battery to protect from the high potential battery
__________________
Don't ask a bunch of unknown forum people if it is OK to do something on YOUR boat. It is your boat, do what you want!
sailorboy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 05:18   #23
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,002
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

So can you provide some statistics?

I haven't heard of any solar specific fires, so is there really a problem related to solar panels or just normal electrical issues.
valhalla360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 05:28   #24
Registered User
 
thomm225's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay Area
Boat: Bristol 27
Posts: 10,551
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

The most current I have seen with my "large" panels ( a 65W and 50W) in parallel is 3-5 amps. Voltage 18-21. This on the Victron Monitor w/laptop

So the 14 gauge wire I found and am still using works fine. The 50 watt panel is a Renogy and has their standard size wire, connectors, and a 8' extension. Looks to be 12 AWG

In the early am, I will sometimes aim both panels at the Sun as it clears the horizon to recharge my two 12 volt batteries which are down a bit from running an AC Fan all night.

During the day, usually only one or two panels out of the four I have (65, 50, 20, 20) will be receive totally sunshine. The 20 watt panels are in parallel going to a PWM Controller

Batteries are fused to the load(s) but not to the controller/panels.

I'm still experimenting with the my solar and battery setup
thomm225 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 05:54   #25
Moderator Emeritus
 
a64pilot's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
Fire risk posed by solar panels

I’m glad this came up.
Here in George Town apparently in the last 30 days there have been three cases of flexible panels starting Bimini fires, and as a guess that may have been what set the boat alight that burned to the waterline recently as the story I head was he was listening to headphones while sitting in the the cockpit and suddenly the Bimini was on fire.

A little research shows that many of the house fires may have something to do with leaves etc building up beneath and around the panels.

It would seem that panels are subject to a cell failure that causes an internal short, the internal short of course causes excessive heat and of the panel is laying on something flammable or has flammable material around it, you have a fire of course. If there is nothing close to burn, then it’s just a failed panel.
It would also seem that flexible panels, are more likely to have a cell damaged, can sometimes be made from flammable materials, and are more likely to be laying on flammable materials than hard panels.
Of course a few cases may be poor installs, chafed wiring, looses connections and the like that are unrelated to the panels themselves.

Still 1% or more of boats at anchor having failures that result in overheats in one month is excessive.


All of this is supposition of my own, so take it for what it’s worth.
a64pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 07:09   #26
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2015
Boat: R&C Leopard 40
Posts: 887
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Every source of power on or to the boat carries some risk. The key is to minimize it. But in the end, there is still some risk. So either learn to live with less power, or accept some risk.

Generators create heat and CO. (and noise that might anger other cruisers).
Shore power connections overheat and melt. Shore power connections also contribute to galvanic corrosion.

It seems rigid panels on metal frames would be the absolute safest.

Whatever route you take, use good quality components and wire them up properly. Also consider the controller charge settings to ensure you don't melt your batteries.

Personally, I don't plug in to marina shore power and feel very safe with my 1440 watt solar setup. I only use a Honda 2.2k as backup power. Preferably only using occasionally to run fresh gas through it.
__________________
-Chris
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 08:21   #27
cruiser

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Half Moon Bay, CA, USA
Boat: 1963 Pearson Ariel, Hull 75
Posts: 1,111
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jammer View Post
There have been a number of solar panel fires at commercial solar installations. A few fires and some near misses have occurred on boats.


A number of solar panels have been recalled by their manufacturers due to fire hazards, including Renology flexible panels and some Bosch rigid ones.


There have also been a number of fires originating in combiner boxes on systems where these are used.


Have you made any changes to your solar system to address fire safety? Beyond ordinary care and electrical best practices, were there any steps you took during the design, selection, and installation process to mitigate fire risk?
Here's a risk I've personally seen:

Ten small flexible panels, each rated at 15 watts (about 1 amp short circuit current output). The interface wires (outputs) are 20 AWG wire. The leads are short (less than a foot) and are intended to be connected to a bus with larger gauge wire.

No fuses - just direct connections to a terminal strip. The entire PV bus also has larger panels: two 65 watt panels. The total PV bus capacity is 270 watts.

One small PV panel then short-circuits internally when someone steps on it, and the ENTIRE output of the PV bus (about 20 amps) flows through the pair of 20 AWG wires and the thin aluminum cell interconnects inside that panel. The panel is coated with a non-skid plastic that isn't flame retardant.

Poof! Smoke and fire. Correction: install 2 amp fuses in series to each small panel. A 15 watt (22 volt open circuit voltage) panel should NEVER see 2 amps flowing through it.

Panels should be manufactured with internal fuse links, but since those links might reduce output by a few percent due to series resistance, it isn't done. I consider the omission of series fuses to be an industry-wide manufacturing defect that has to be mitigated by the consumer with external fuses.

I recommend installing a fuse in series with the output of EVERY panel in an array. The fuse should be sized to a maximum of twice the short-circuit output rating of the panel. Yes, it'll result in a loss of a few percent in usable output.


Installing Schottky steering diodes in series with each panel to block current from the bus flowing to any individual panel will also work, but the loss (about 0.3 Volt) may be greater than the loss through a fuse (but it'll also eliminate reverse current losses). Diode can also short from a serious reverse polarity transient pulse (think lightning), so I don't recommend diodes in place of fuses.
Cpt Pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 09:05   #28
CLOD
 
sailorboy1's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: being planted in Jacksonville Fl
Boat: none
Posts: 20,419
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Has anyone ever seen a MC4 connector with a built in fuse????
__________________
Don't ask a bunch of unknown forum people if it is OK to do something on YOUR boat. It is your boat, do what you want!
sailorboy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 13:10   #29
CF Adviser
 
Pelagic's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Boat: Van Helleman Schooner 65ft StarGazer
Posts: 10,280
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Not all panels are made with the same quality controls

This is why I like Sunpower

https://youtu.be/kdi-qmhCLgI
Pelagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 04:35   #30
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,431
Images: 241
Re: Fire risk posed by solar panels

Greetings and welcome aboard the CF, JJDPHD, btlflpztk, StevenM, and lhusty.
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
panels, solar, solar panels


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fire Risk in High Current 12V Wiring Jeanneau 45.2 Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 8 12-06-2017 07:13
manifold fire risk to grp abbott013 Construction, Maintenance & Refit 0 13-05-2012 05:23
manifold fire risk to grp abbott013 Engines and Propulsion Systems 0 12-05-2012 14:09

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 14:42.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.