Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Seamanship, Navigation & Boat Handling > OpenCPN
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-05-2016, 08:41   #1
Registered User
 
rgleason's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: 1981 Bristol 32 Sloop
Posts: 17,627
Images: 2
Tracker: What to do about 166 Feature Requests?

Please read this post:
http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...ml#post2111198

And make any comments below in this thread, Thank you:
=======================
rgleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2016, 17:25   #2
Registered User
 
rgleason's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: 1981 Bristol 32 Sloop
Posts: 17,627
Images: 2
Re: Tracker: What to do about 166 Feature Requests?

Link to Tracker: 00-Opencpn Feature Requests
OpenCPN::OpenCPN00 - OpenCPN - Feature Requests: Tasklist

Link to Register for Tracker.
OpenCPN::OpenCPNRegister new user
rgleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2016, 06:41   #3
Registered User
 
rgleason's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: 1981 Bristol 32 Sloop
Posts: 17,627
Images: 2
Re: Tracker: What to do about 166 Feature Requests?

Well, there seems to have been some VOTING in the Feature Request Project which is good, but certainly not a significant number of users. Also nobody has commented on how to get these Feature Requests in manageable form, so I am going to be moving all Feature Requests with less than 5 VOTES into an "Unvetted Feature Requests" Project.

This project has been made now. "000 Unvetted Feature Requests". It will not be difficult to fill this Project.

So my suggestion is to vote for the features you want.
rgleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2016, 06:59   #4
Registered User
 
rgleason's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: 1981 Bristol 32 Sloop
Posts: 17,627
Images: 2
Re: Tracker: What to do about 166 Feature Requests?

Rather than have "Unvetted Feature Requests" I think it would be best to leave most of the Feature Requests where they are, and make a more positive catagory called

"00 - OpenCPN - Feature Requests Vetted > 4 votes"

I think this will not result in too many changes to the work flow.
rgleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2016, 07:19   #5
Registered User
 
rgleason's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: 1981 Bristol 32 Sloop
Posts: 17,627
Images: 2
Re: Tracker: What to do about 166 Feature Requests?

Here is the new Vetted > 4 Votes Project List (8 Items)

OpenCPN::OpenCPN00 - OpenCPN Feature Requests Vetted > 4 Votes: Tasklist

Get Voting for features you would like to see.

If I were a programmer I would not bother looking at any Feature Requests that have less than 5 votes, there are too many other priorities.
rgleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Feature Requests bdbcat OpenCPN 3473 08-04-2024 12:15
Tracker: AIS Feature Requests rgleason OpenCPN 36 24-04-2014 07:47
Tracker: Chart Feature Requests rgleason OpenCPN 3 24-09-2013 06:08
Tracker: Night Vision Mode Feature Requests rgleason OpenCPN 3 16-09-2013 19:08
Tracker: RM [Route Manager] Feature Requests rgleason OpenCPN 0 14-09-2013 07:58

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 22:26.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.