|
|
09-12-2010, 04:48
|
#391
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Boat: 10.50 mètres
Posts: 2,964
|
hello,
Quote:
Originally Posted by petermoree
MOB mark cannot be deleted.
Tried all kinds of things till PC crashed (vould not repeat the crash either)
Peter
|
MOB can be deleted but only in the "Route manager". And I am OK for this.
But, I said another my idea for the temporary route associated with the MOB. I prefer a circle with eventually a route from the boat to the MOB.
Best regards
Gilletarom.
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 05:15
|
#392
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Boat: TINTEL (36ft Hoek design) see https://www.moree.nl/tintel
Posts: 126
|
Thanks Gille and a agree with you
Peter
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 05:43
|
#393
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Boat: TINTEL (36ft Hoek design) see https://www.moree.nl/tintel
Posts: 126
|
Font settings in Toolbax
The Font settings work fine for the Tooltips anyway.
But you cannot set the color (if you choose magenta or yellow the font remains black). The yellow could be a choice for persons who would like to read the info in the *night* setting of the OpenCPN.
The font setting works also fine for *Marks* (also with the color limitation as above)
For Console Legend and Console Value I cannot see what happens when I change the values of the font settings (I also do not have any idea what Console Legend and Console Value actually stands for)
The AIS rollover I cannot test at home
Peter
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 05:49
|
#394
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Boat: TINTEL (36ft Hoek design) see https://www.moree.nl/tintel
Posts: 126
|
Toolbox settings Etc. GUI Wheel Zoom function
The *Wheel Zoom to Cursor* setting does have no apparent function.
If not marked, wheelzoom works fine
If marked, wheelzoom works fine also
Peter
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 06:14
|
#395
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Boat: TINTEL (36ft Hoek design) see https://www.moree.nl/tintel
Posts: 126
|
GRIB file display
See enclosed screen shots
The same gribfile input gives far more detail (isobars etc) in Expedition (a free grib reader) in compare to the OCPN plugin. Allthough the plugin indicates it knows that the isobar data is there.
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 06:18
|
#396
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tierra del Fuego
Boat: Phantom 19
Posts: 6,194
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailorF54
All topmarks seem slanted now... So one more time Pavel
|
Yes, I'm aware of it. The problem is that there is no way to tell whether the topmark is placed above a floating (buoy, topmark should be slanted) or fixed (beacon, topmark should be upright) object in the rules themself. The original custom symbolization procedure in the code has implemented it by searching for other objects at the same position.
As far as I can tell, the effect is disruptive just with the cardinal marks - cones, double cones, balls and double balls. I should be able to come up with modified rules, that will use the CS for these objects. Stay tuned...
Pavel
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 06:27
|
#397
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Almería, ES
Boat: Chiquita 46 - Libertalia
Posts: 1,558
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by petermoree
Same with me
repeat Toolbox / Charts / OK a couple of times
Each time the list doubles in size
It does not seem to affect the program
|
I get this too - 1207 linux
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 06:45
|
#398
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Boat: TINTEL (36ft Hoek design) see https://www.moree.nl/tintel
Posts: 126
|
Importing old waypoints from a saved gpx file
I imported data (my favorite Norwegian achorages) from an older gpx file (of the current 2.1.0 version)
The result goes haywire. Not on the anchorages, these are OK.
But old tracks show up very funny. See enclosed screendump.
Peter
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 07:51
|
#399
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rome
Posts: 320
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilletarom
hello,
MOB can be deleted but only in the "Route manager". And I am OK for this.
...
Gilletarom.
|
I agree with this, but:
1) either the right click contex menu should not include the "Delete Mark" option if the mark is a MOB mark.
2) or trying to use Delete Mark over a MOB should just open a message box saying "MOB Mark can only be deleted in Route Manager"
Ciao, Marco.
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 08:09
|
#400
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Boat: 10.50 mètres
Posts: 2,964
|
OK Pavel. We stay tuned.
Hello Pavel,
Quote:
Originally Posted by nohal
Yes, I'm aware of it. ..........
As far as I can tell, the effect is disruptive just with the cardinal marks - cones, double cones, balls and double balls. I should be able to come up with modified rules, that will use the CS for these objects. Stay tuned...
Pavel
|
I was preparing to write on the same subject. So I'll stay tuned
Best regards
Gilletarom.
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 08:15
|
#401
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Boat: 10.50 mètres
Posts: 2,964
|
Hello,
Quote:
Originally Posted by GPS-Marco
I agree with this, but:
1) either the right click contex menu should not include the "Delete Mark" option if the mark is a MOB mark.
Ciao, Marco.
|
The first idea seems to me preferable
Best regards
Gilletarom.
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 08:18
|
#402
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Boat: TINTEL (36ft Hoek design) see https://www.moree.nl/tintel
Posts: 126
|
For me the second idea is preferable (no unsanswered question left then)
Peter
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 16:37
|
#403
|
Marine Service Provider
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,387
|
Petermoree....
Could you please post by attachment the GPX file which is causing import difficulties in 1207?
Thanks
Dave
|
|
|
09-12-2010, 17:44
|
#404
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tierra del Fuego
Boat: Phantom 19
Posts: 6,194
|
Corrected rasterization rules II
Guys,
attached is hopefully the version of the rules releasable as 2.3 without major complaints
Using the TOPMAR01 symbolization procedure is enforced for all the cardinal and lateral symbol topmarks (balls, cones, cans), cubes and boards - in practice we never had any more topmarks that had both the upright and slanted version, so the behavior for what we had before should not change at all from previous versions. The rest of the extensions is kept intact - Big thanks to Gilletarom again.
For the future the topmark and daymark symbolization should probably be revised once again as there is quite a lot of differences between various charts (ENC vs. IENC, ENC vs. CM93...) which are currently sometimes hard to handle properly as we just have one set of the rules. The "competition" (SeeMyENC and Caris at least) usually uses different symbolization datasets for different charts... Don't think it's the way to go though as there will never be enough manpower to maintain it besides other complications.
Pavel
|
|
|
10-12-2010, 01:32
|
#405
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Boat: TINTEL (36ft Hoek design) see https://www.moree.nl/tintel
Posts: 126
|
gpx file
here is the gpx file you requested
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|