"What do I think is worthy in female writers? Do you think I would be easily baited by your childish inquiry? I am no idiot monkey. Do not make a mockery of an intelligent super monkey who also, like you, writes. We can step outside for that different kind of conversation. We can see too if your writing is wall worthy as I pin you to the ground with my hairy arms singing something atonal instead of that Bach crap you mentioned." SM-no pun intended?
Sentence one: When one makes blanket statements, as you did previously
concerning female writers, a reasonable person would
expect an example from someone who has described
themselves in . . .
Sentence two: as "an intelligent super monkey." Which, must be taken at
its face value irrespective of the fact that you are, indeed,
on a lower, more primal branch of the evolutionary tree.
However, in your modesty, you have at least been truthful
in describing yourself and sincere kudos for the effort. But,
in skipping sentences 3 and 4 we are left with . . .
Sentence five: and referring to, perhaps, the greatest musical genius of
all time as "crap" -- a statement no serious musician or
musical aficionado would ever give credence. But, perhaps,
your musical tastes are closer to the "three chord guitarist"
I mentioned earlier. This, of course, would be truly
characteristic of a simian . . . albeit an atonal one calling
from the branches.
Good luck, safe sailing and may your life be filled with the cacophony of the atonally insane John Cage. Perhaps our readers might confer.