Is C02 causing a greening of our ocean's?

[GoingWalkabout]

Originally Posted by thinwater

Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell. I hope so.

The Chinese used walls to stop the Mongols. Many Midieval European Principalities effectifely used walls to protect their domain. Even the English used walls with motes to protect their castle city.

Given the posters concern about marauding hordes flooding into Canada because of food shortages perhaps Canada should start now on building a big Wall and have the United States pay for it.

[Mirage35]

Originally Posted by senormechanico

Here we go again...

Methinks Ms. Walkabout gets her amusement by starting threads that she knows (or should know) will be controversial.

[four winds]

First human whose NAME was known.

Of course I suspect you know that. More fun to use opportunity to get the turbines spun up.

Three grins and a whistle to the face palm pic. The intention of this thread is clear. I'm baffled how anyone could enjoy this nonsense.

Don't worry won't be back.

[jackdale]

/ignore

[GoingWalkabout]

Originally Posted by jackdale

/ignore

How can you ignore all of the CO2 being absorbed by the oceans, the green grass on the sea floor it must be creating and the consequent increase in Whale populations. Aren't whales just as dangerous as university floating drone projects?

But really. How can we ignore what is going on in our oceans.

[conachair]

Originally Posted by GoingWalkabout

Your myth writers should stay with writing comic book fantasy. Since when was the first human know an Egyptian. Politically inspired historical revisionism I would say.

So given your cartoon writers twisted history on their time line, what else have they twisted?

Propoganda for those with the mentality of a child.

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2013/03...e-big-picture/

This one any better for you?

Marcott et al. (2013, A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years, Science, Vol. 339 no. 6124 pp. 1198-1201, DOI:10.1126/science.1228026). Data for their reconstructions, and the proxy data on which they’re based, are part of the supplementary materials.

[GoingWalkabout]

Originally Posted by conachair

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2013/03...e-big-picture/

This one any better for you?

Marcott et al. (2013, A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years, Science, Vol. 339 no. 6124 pp. 1198-1201, DOI:10.1126/science.1228026). Data for their reconstructions, and the proxy data on which they’re based, are part of the supplementary materials.

Where's the C02?

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by GoingWalkabout

How can you ignore all of the CO2 being absorbed by the oceans, the green grass on the sea floor it must be creating and the consequent increase in Whale populations. Aren't whales just as dangerous as university floating drone projects?

But really. How can we ignore what is going on in our oceans.

I will be ignoring this thread, not happens in the oceans. I am concerned about OA and plastic pollution.

BTW - whales are carnivores.

Are Whales Carnivores?

[GoingWalkabout]

Originally Posted by jackdale

I will be ignoring this thread, not happens in the oceans. I am concerned about OA and plastic pollution.

BTW - whales are carnivores.

Are Whales Carnivores?

You are technically correct. The largest of whales, the blue whale eats plankton and Krill. Krill is a meat. Smaller than a locust. Krill breads on plankton. Increased plankton growth will help with the Krill population. A thing very much needed as the Japanese are strip fishing for Krill in the Antarctic and causing devastation to the marine eco system.

Yes whales eat krill. And birds eat bugs such as locusts. Making them both technically meat eaters.

[conachair]

Originally Posted by GoingWalkabout

Where's the C02?

It's not a graph of co2, it's temperature anomalies which you said was Propoganda for those with the mentality of a child.

Which must include science magazine where the the paper was published.

[GoingWalkabout]

Originally Posted by conachair

It's not a graph of co2, it's temperature anomalies which you said was Propoganda for those with the mentality of a child.

Which must include science magazine where the the paper was published.

Therefore your original posting is very much off topic since it was dealing with temperature that has nothing to do with C02.

As for Science Magazine. Yes, that erstwhile journal of science, I don't think.

[weavis]

Not going to happen.

Please try and have threads related to boats and boating or boat life. This is a sailing forum.