|
17-12-2013, 15:22
|
#2
|
Nearly an old salt
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lefkas Marina ,Greece
Boat: Bavaria 36
Posts: 22,801
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SvenG
|
Not surprising when two big warships play chicken
Dave
__________________
Interested in smart boat technology, networking and all things tech
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 15:26
|
#3
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Ciudad de la Misión Didacus de Alcalá en Alta California, Virreinato de Nueva España
Boat: Cal 20
Posts: 20,556
|
A venue that describes both an aircraft carrier and a cruiser as 'battleships' probably can't be depended on for much more than the very basic facts. Issues of admiralty law and international territorial disputes are likely beyond their ability to keep straight.
__________________
Num Me Vexo?
For all of your celestial navigation questions: https://navlist.net/
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground no one would think to try and refloat it.
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 16:41
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ontario canada
Boat: grampian 26
Posts: 1,743
|
Re: Close call in South China Sea
In 1988 the USS Caron was rammed by a Russian Warship in the Black Sea so it isn't that uncommon.
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 16:52
|
#5
|
CF Adviser
Join Date: Oct 2007
Boat: Van Helleman Schooner 65ft StarGazer
Posts: 10,280
|
Details of incident indicated that the US ship got too close to the security ring of the new Chinese Carrier, ignored the warnings and close quarter games began with the ships tasked to protect the carrier. If positions were reversed, US navy would have done the same. So I fault the US
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 17:10
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 793
|
Re: Close call in South China Sea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelagic
Details of incident indicated that the US ship got too close to the security ring of the new Chinese Carrier, ignored the warnings and close quarter games began with the ships tasked to protect the carrier. If positions were reversed, US navy would have done the same. So I fault the US
|
Yes, but it's still Obama's fault, I'm sure
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 18:26
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montegut LA.
Boat: Now we need to get her to Louisiana !! she's ours
Posts: 3,421
|
Re: Close call in South China Sea
Ya got it right boatie!! I mean these little boats are so small that no one could ever see them without AIS !! I mean my 7-50s would never be strong enough to see em !!! And we all know thats it's Obamas fault our ships don't have AIS Right ??
__________________
Bob and Connie
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 18:34
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philippines in the winters
Boat: It’s in French Polynesia now
Posts: 11,368
|
Re: Close call in South China Sea
They just have their thumbs on the silent button. That's all.
__________________
Faithful are the Wounds of a Friend, but the Kisses of the Enemy are Deceitful! ........
The measure of a man is how he navigates to a proper shore in the midst of a storm!
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 18:37
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Boat: None at this time
Posts: 8,462
|
Re: Close call in South China Sea
I just don't understand the US playing chicken with a Chinese Carrier group. Could you just imagine what would happen to you or I if we tried to get close to an American Carrier? The Chinese have declared a ADIZ which may or may not be realistic. Did the Americans ask permission when they declared the NA ADIZ? I think not.
Here is a quote from gCaptain:
Quote:
2) China wasn’t doing anything the United States would not have done.
Surprise, surprise folks, the United States also has escort ships, a.k.a. cruisers and destroyers. Maintaining the surface perimeter around the aircraft carrier is their primary job, followed closely by air warfare defense. If the Chinese – or an unidentified sailboat or fishing vessel- ever tried to approach a U.S. aircraft carrier, uninvited, the U.S. warship captains tasked with maintaining the perimeter around the aircraft carrier would most definitely prevent such a maneuver.
|
The American Navy is playing a dangerous game, IMHO.
|
|
|
17-12-2013, 19:32
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 44
|
Re: Close call in South China Sea
it's a game all right. The Chinese testing us, and the US testing the Chinese. News outlets have all kinds of analysis - namely the Chinese thinking we are a power in decline.
It could get messy. I'm certain the US Navy can take care of business if necessary.
Question is, should cruisers give this whole region a wide berth until things are sorted.
|
|
|
18-12-2013, 03:48
|
#12
|
Nearly an old salt
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lefkas Marina ,Greece
Boat: Bavaria 36
Posts: 22,801
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wincrasher
it's a game all right. The Chinese testing us, and the US testing the Chinese. News outlets have all kinds of analysis - namely the Chinese thinking we are a power in decline.
It could get messy. I'm certain the US Navy can take care of business if necessary.
Question is, should cruisers give this whole region a wide berth until things are sorted.
|
Well its not really a game of testing , more posturing , the US craft sailed into the Chinese self declared control zone. The chineese fleet then changed course to cross the bow of the US ship , forcing it to execute a complete stop. Cue subsequent protest from US to China , seemingly both bridges maintained professional communication throughout.
Just geo- political fun and games , no way the US is going to really upset the Chinese , they need them to much !
Ultimately the US will sit on Japan and tell them to back off
Dave
__________________
Interested in smart boat technology, networking and all things tech
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|