Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Scuttlebutt > Dollars & Cents
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 13-12-2011, 10:11   #1
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Florida and the Caribbean
Boat: Former owner of a 2001 34' Gemini 105MC Catamaran
Posts: 158
Florida's Admissibility of Loss Conclusions in Marine Damage Claim Survey Reports

Hello,

I wanted to share a recent blog I wrote online based on some of my own experieince with marine survey damage claims and some of the legal tricks that are pulled when these losses go into litigation. The blog was written simply to make boat owners in Florida aware of what may happen if they have a loss that may go into litigation and what can happen to make your marine damage claim report deemed inadmissible.

There is nothing worse than seeing someone going into court with a rightous, strong case only to have their exhibits or evidence deemed inadmissible because of some loophole in the law, case law or some previous written court opinion. So I thought I would write a bit about this subject to help make others aware on some of these existing legal opinions that exist that are relevant to marine damage claims. The link is below at:

Florida’s Admissibility of Loss Conclusions in Marine Damage Claim Survey Reports | Suenos Azules Marine Surveying and Consulting
__________________
Capt. John Banister, AMS®
SAMS® Accredited Marine Surveyor
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
SuenosAzules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2011, 11:25   #2
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Heathsville, VA
Boat: Gemini 105Mc 34'
Posts: 1,457
Re: Florida's Admissibility of Loss Conclusions in Marine Damage Claim Survey Reports

You may find it best not to say, but I'll give it a shot anyway: Are there certain, or types, of insurance companies that are more likely to use these tactics?
Waterway Guide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2011, 11:37   #3
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Florida and the Caribbean
Boat: Former owner of a 2001 34' Gemini 105MC Catamaran
Posts: 158
Re: Florida's Admissibility of Loss Conclusions in Marine Damage Claim Survey Reports

I could not give you a list on who or who does not use those types of court tactics, only to say that in Florida it is there for the taking if a lawyer wanted a Damage Claim Report to be thrown out. It would definately at least be entertained by the existing case law and legal opinions that exist in this state. Another tactic I have seen in my experience is bigger companies or those with more money that will file countless numbers of motions during litigation just to run up the opposing side's (typically the boat owner) legal costs in order to in essence bankrupt them out of the case.
__________________
Capt. John Banister, AMS®
SAMS® Accredited Marine Surveyor
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
SuenosAzules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2011, 12:14   #4
Registered User
 
S/V Antares's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Annapolis, Bahamas
Boat: 1983 Gulfstar 36
Posts: 1,253
Images: 1
Re: Florida's Admissibility of Loss Conclusions in Marine Damage Claim Survey Reports

Thank you for a very well writen blog and informative post. I have witnessed the inadmisability of obvious information in cases. I am not suprised to hear this. It just confirms the old saying:

"First we shoot all the lawyers"
__________________
Will & Muffin
Lucy the dog

"Yes, well.. perhaps some more wine" (Julia Child)
S/V Antares is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2011, 12:17   #5
CLOD
 
sailorboy1's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: being planted in Jacksonville Fl
Boat: none
Posts: 20,415
Re: Florida's Admissibility of Loss Conclusions in Marine Damage Claim Survey Reports

If I am understanding you are saying in FL the surveyor needs to also be a PI for the report to be admissable in court?
__________________
Don't ask a bunch of unknown forum people if it is OK to do something on YOUR boat. It is your boat, do what you want!
sailorboy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2011, 12:27   #6
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Florida and the Caribbean
Boat: Former owner of a 2001 34' Gemini 105MC Catamaran
Posts: 158
Re: Florida's Admissibility of Loss Conclusions in Marine Damage Claim Survey Reports

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Lucas View Post
If I am understanding you are saying in FL the surveyor needs to also be a PI for the report to be admissable in court?
What I have seen, as outlined in the blog I wrote for Florida boaters is this; In Florida if you do any kind of investigation work such as getting witness statements or give a statement to a loss conclusion based on investigative efforts that if the case were to go into litigation there is enough case law and legal opinions to support having those findings ruled as inadmissible (whether they be oral or in a marine damage claim report) if they did not come from someone that held a Florida Private Investigator's License. It is a loophole. I am simply pointing it out.
__________________
Capt. John Banister, AMS®
SAMS® Accredited Marine Surveyor
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
SuenosAzules is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
florida, marine, survey


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.