Member Map Go to the Home Page Portal Cruisers & Sailing Forum Cruisers & Sailing Photo Gallery Manage Your Profile! Member Directory Search past discussions! Frequently Asked Questions Community Policies & Posting Rules Register Today, Its FREE!

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Scuttlebutt > The Library





Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 24-02-2008, 02:41   #1
Registered User
 
Whimsical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fremantle Australia
Boat: Schioning 12.3 "Wilderness" Bi-Rig under construction
Posts: 520
Send a message via Skype™ to Whimsical
One thing that always seems to be missing in the debate as to which device to employ, parra or drouge, is the position of the vessel in relation to the storm. If I was in the quadrant where running off would follow the track of the storm then I would use the anchor. Conversly if in the other quadrants then running off would shorten the dance with the devil so thats the way I would go.
Searoom may alter the decision however.

Mike
Whimsical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2008, 07:09   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Belleville, Ontario, Canada; Playa Zaragoza, Isla de Margarita
Boat: 1994 Solaris Sunstream 40 'Estrella del Sur'
Posts: 1,014
Mike, I would agree that trying to be in the correct quandrant of a storm as it approaches is extremely important. This is imprecise, of course, as storms rarely stay to a constant or predicted course. Furthermore, the required direction of travel (typically to the west in the northern hemishpere, east in the southern) might cause you to head towards shore, reducing available searoom and putting you over a shoaling (or at least shallowing) bottom: this would only worsen your prospects once the storm hits. If you have the sea room, then by all means you should sail away from the most lethal part of the storm.

Having said that, once you are in the storm and are at or approaching survival conditions (what we are talking about here), running off will require constant attention to the helm and increase the risk of pitchpoling.

There are many proponents of high-speed scudding, or running with a storm - Dumas and Moitessier being perhaps the first to write about it in the context of a yacht. Due to the requirement for constant and fastidious attention to the helm, Vigor recommends this tactic only if your boat is being overwhelmed streaming drogues, or setting to a sea-anchor. Indeed, even Moitessier attempted the technique only after he had deployed drogues and found that (eventually) the cockpit was being repeatedly barraged by breaking seas. We must also remember that he was obviously in the wrong quadrant as he remained with the storm for a couple of days - an awfully long time for a short-handed crew, even in good conditions.

So yes, scudding makes sense if you are in the correct quadrant, have searoom and adequate rested and capable crew. On the other hand, there is good sense in attempting a passive tactic as a first line of defence. This will allow the crew an opportunity to adjust to the violent motion, sounds and yes fear while maintaining their strength should scudding become necessary.

Brad
Southern Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2008, 19:53   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oz
Boat: Jarcat 5, 5m, Mandy
Posts: 418
To avoid the problem of what to do if the drogue is in adequate fro the conditions, have a boat that is set up for having the parachute from the rear,
Robert
Robertcateran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2008, 20:28   #4
Registered User
 
Wotname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Boat: Van DeStat Super Dogger 31'
Posts: 1,250
Paul L & Ssullivan,
I am not sure I can agree with the explanations of what causes a problem with storm created waves. I think we have to distinguish between what happens when a boat is safely hove to and when it is in danger of capsize / broaching / pitch poling etc.
Again I am only considering mono's (because I dont know anything about multi's).

Hove to (with or without para anchor set): From my understanding of the Pardey's Storm Tactics, the keel is ~ 50 degrees off the wind (and waves) due to being hove to. The water is then flowing sideways around the keel. This causes turbulence to the surface layers of the water in the wave system. As the boat is pushed sideways downwind, the disturbance appears to move to windard (but really is stationary). Before it dissipates, it has sufficent affect on the approaching wave to modify surface flows in the wave to prevent it breaking dangerously. This is the slick they refer to and how it prevents the crest of the approaching sea from breaking in the vinicity of the boat. The reason the keel shape is considered is because different keel shapes will affect how stationary the boat remains relative approaching seas. The boat must stay directly downwind of this slick and not fore reach out of this protective area. A full keel will remain more stationary then a fin keel but most fin keels should be able to be kept stationary with a bit more effort in considering sail area, sail position and tiller position. The para anchor when set off a bridle and kept directly upwind while the boat maintains ~50 off the wind helps to hold the boat stationary w.r.t. the slick. It also creates some disturbance to the surface layers itself and thus assists in modifying the wave crests even further upwind.
BTW this won't happen if a para anchor is set directly from the bow. The para anchor will try to pull the boat out of the hove to position thus will present its keel directly into the wave system and not create any turbulence. A fin keel boat will still sail around a bit and be exposed to breaking seas on its fore quater or even its beam - not good.

However very different things happen if there is no "protection" from this slick. As I understand storm conditions, the danger comes from large breaking seas overpowering the boat. Not the type of breaking crests where the water is simply flowing down the front of the wave like a giant white cap. Rather large curling or overreaching seas more like large surf breaking on a shoaling shore. These breaking seas will typically fall onto the lee side of the boat (hove to - out of the slick - or lying ahull). The boat is damaged with tons of water falling onto it. The wind has the boat already heeled, the lee deck is pushed further under by the breaking sea, the circular motion of the surface layer of the wave is pushing the keel up to windward and the boat is at least knocked down if not rolled right over. From my reading, most damage occurs to the lee side of the boat.
Slighty different mechanics occur if broaching but the end result remains the same. Again different mechanics with pitch poling and even worse outcomes.

The above is simply my limited undertsanding of the dymanics of the seas and mono's in storm conditions concluded from reading every account I can of the same and some rather limited sea time in winds over 40 kts. I am very happy to consider other explanations and to be proved wrong in any of my assumptions.
__________________
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangereous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. T.E. Lawrence
Wotname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 02:42   #5
Registered User
 
David_Old_Jersey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Les Illes de La Manche - Sitting in an Armchair, tied to the Dock :-)
Boat: "Wayluya" Seadog 30
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wotname View Post
However very different things happen if there is no "protection" from this slick. As I understand storm conditions, the danger comes from large breaking seas overpowering the boat. Not the type of breaking crests where the water is simply flowing down the front of the wave like a giant white cap. Rather large curling or overreaching seas more like large surf breaking on a shoaling shore. These breaking seas will typically fall onto the lee side of the boat (hove to - out of the slick - or lying ahull). The boat is damaged with tons of water falling onto it. The wind has the boat already heeled, the lee deck is pushed further under by the breaking sea, the circular motion of the surface layer of the wave is pushing the keel up to windward and the boat is at least knocked down if not rolled right over. From my reading, most damage occurs to the lee side of the boat.
Slighty different mechanics occur if broaching but the end result remains the same. Again different mechanics with pitch poling and even worse outcomes.

The above is simply my limited undertsanding of the dymanics of the seas and mono's in storm conditions concluded from reading every account I can of the same and some rather limited sea time in winds over 40 kts. I am very happy to consider other explanations and to be proved wrong in any of my assumptions.
I too am struggling to understand the dynamics of all this......

The Pardey storm anchor approach seems to be an enhancement of hoving to - which I have tried on previous boats (just for fun / to see what happens / make lunch ) and found it worked great - albeit for me not in any weather where I actually needed to do so. I reckon the slick "works" because water goes for the route of least resistance - but I stand to be corrected!

My thinking is that if hoving to works well in "normal" bad weather, then the Pardey Storm Anchor hoving to approach will work well in "badder" bad weather .......but when (gawd forbid!) in a situation where green waves are breaking over the boat (like surf waves) then my gut tells me I would want the bow directly facing these breaking waves and not to be lying abeam or even having only a fore quarter facing the breaking waves..........even if the price to be paid is the loss of the slick that makes life more comfortable for "normal" waves. (from my attempts at surfing many years ago I am well aware that their is an awful lot of (dynamic?) power in breaking waves - as well as simply a lot of weight!).

Am not planning to test any of this anytime soon
__________________
Join TEAM GOAT! and be a part of The Last Great Sailing Challenge!.........

The First & Youngest & Fastest Goat to sail Solo RTW (Non-Stop)
David_Old_Jersey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 14:11   #6
Registered User
 
Ramona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NSW Australia
Boat: 8 metre quarter tonner, Ramona, Finn racing dinghy,Prindle 16 catamaran, 40 foot commercial fishing
Posts: 24

Quote:
Originally Posted by David_Old_Jersey View Post
my gut tells me I would want the bow directly facing these breaking waves and not to be lying abeam or even having only a fore quarter facing the breaking waves.
Directly facing the waves is not a good idea. Even with moderate sized waves you can find your self airborne and falling into the trough. I have done this in my 40 foot fishing vessel and it hurts.
Up the waves at an angle and down the other side the same is the optimum.

sneuman, thanks for your write up. It is helping me decide on my next yacht.
Ramona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 12:47   #7
Registered User
 
CharlieCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: PNW
Boat: 1961 Knutson 35 Yawl
Posts: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by David_Old_Jersey View Post
I too am struggling to understand the dynamics of all this......

The Pardey storm anchor approach seems to be an enhancement of hoving to - which I have tried on previous boats (just for fun / to see what happens / make lunch ) and found it worked great - albeit for me not in any weather where I actually needed to do so. I reckon the slick "works" because water goes for the route of least resistance - but I stand to be corrected!

My thinking is that if hoving to works well in "normal" bad weather, then the Pardey Storm Anchor hoving to approach will work well in "badder" bad weather .......but when (gawd forbid!) in a situation where green waves are breaking over the boat (like surf waves) then my gut tells me I would want the bow directly facing these breaking waves and not to be lying abeam or even having only a fore quarter facing the breaking waves..........even if the price to be paid is the loss of the slick that makes life more comfortable for "normal" waves. (from my attempts at surfing many years ago I am well aware that their is an awful lot of (dynamic?) power in breaking waves - as well as simply a lot of weight!).

Am not planning to test any of this anytime soon
What the Pardeys found was that when hove to with the para anchor, the breakers seemed to collapse onto the slick before they reached the boat and the only thing that hit the boat was foam. IIRC they watched for a long time to see exactly what the big breakers were doing before going below.
__________________
1961 Knutson K-35 Yawl Oh Joy
CharlieCobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 15:41   #8
Registered User
 
David_Old_Jersey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Les Illes de La Manche - Sitting in an Armchair, tied to the Dock :-)
Boat: "Wayluya" Seadog 30
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieCobra View Post
What the Pardeys found was that when hove to with the para anchor, the breakers seemed to collapse onto the slick before they reached the boat and the only thing that hit the boat was foam. IIRC they watched for a long time to see exactly what the big breakers were doing before going below.
It occurs to me that it takes a certain type of person to sit in the middle of a gale and say to themselves "lets try something completely new and untried".

I have been thinking .........could a Para Anchor be deployed from the stern? with the boat then held at the 50 degree angle - it would save having to turn the vessel.......of course would need strong points at the stern!

Anyone want to try it out in a Force 10? (just to satisfy my curiosity )
__________________
Join TEAM GOAT! and be a part of The Last Great Sailing Challenge!.........

The First & Youngest & Fastest Goat to sail Solo RTW (Non-Stop)
David_Old_Jersey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 09:23   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nevada City. CA
Boat: Sceptre 41 Ohana
Posts: 1,942
The Jordan Series Drogue is one of the ideas that I would want to use in the case of a Typhoon or Hurricane. The Drogue was studied by the Coastguard. It was designed after research on the '79 fastnet race fatalities. But I think that one has to look at their tactics in light of a few consideration including: type of keel, shape and height of waves, amount of wind. I don't have experience in a storm like SNueman but I think that having multiple methods for surviving a storm is the key. Heaving to, running off, series drogue, and using your brain.
__________________
Fair Winds,

Charlie

Between us there was, as I have already said somewhere, the bond of the sea. Besides holding our hearts together through long periods of separation, it had the effect of making us tolerant of each other's yarns -- and even convictions. Heart of Darkness
Joseph Conrad
Charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 14:25   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Belleville, Ontario, Canada; Playa Zaragoza, Isla de Margarita
Boat: 1994 Solaris Sunstream 40 'Estrella del Sur'
Posts: 1,014
Dan, regardless of the 'slick', deploying a sea-anchor from a bridle off the bow/side deck is still a very effective approach to storm management for many yachts.

Brad
Southern Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 15:36   #11
Registered User
 
dacust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeast USA. Boat in Charleston.
Boat: 1982 Sea Ray SRV360 - "Woodstock"
Posts: 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Star View Post
Dan, regardless of the 'slick', deploying a sea-anchor from a bridle off the bow/side deck is still a very effective approach to storm management for many yachts.

Brad
Oh, I'm not argueing with that. I'm only talking about the slick and the claim that it can stop waves from breaking because of the way it disturbs the water.
dacust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 18:33   #12
mjt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brisbane
Boat: Samson C-Shell 36
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by dacust View Post
Oh, I'm not argueing with that. I'm only talking about the slick and the claim that it can stop waves from breaking because of the way it disturbs the water.
Apart from the lucid and detailed account given by the Pardey's in their book, the best motivation I have for believing that the slick induced by a hove to boat can stop breaking waves is this simple experiment:

Get in your dinghy in windy/choppy conditions. Row along and watch the behaviour of the vortices (swirls) left by your oar strokes. The vortices stop wavelets and are so stable that often you can count as many as twenty oar strokes receding into the distance behind your dinghy.

That stability and ability to break up waves comes from the momentum of the vortices. It is a smaller scale version of the combined effects of a hove to keel and a large parachute anchor which will induce swirling in the sea, making a nice stable slick/pathway which helps to destabilise breakers and keep your boat safe.
__________________
mjt
mjt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 18:45   #13
Registered User
 
Wotname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Boat: Van DeStat Super Dogger 31'
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjt View Post
...
Get in your dinghy in windy/choppy conditions. Row along and watch the behaviour of the vortices (swirls) left by your oar strokes. The vortices stop wavelets and are so stable that often you can count as many as twenty oar strokes receding into the distance behind your dinghy.

That stability and ability to break up waves comes from the momentum of the vortices. It is a smaller scale version of the combined effects of a hove to keel and a large parachute anchor which will induce swirling in the sea, making a nice stable slick/pathway which helps to destabilise breakers and keep your boat safe.
Excellent observation, thanks for the input, it helps to understand the dynamics even if I still don't know the science behind it.
__________________
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangereous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. T.E. Lawrence
Wotname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-04-2008, 09:15   #14
Registered User
 
Wotname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Boat: Van DeStat Super Dogger 31'
Posts: 1,250
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by dacust View Post
Oh, I'm not argueing with that. I'm only talking about the slick and the claim that it can stop waves from breaking because of the way it disturbs the water.
Revisiting the thread as the OP was reading L & L's Storm Tactics. Their third edition arrived today and I will have to get off CF and start reading this new updated edition.

The first gem was referring to the "slick" as a Von Karman vortex street (try a google search for more info).
__________________
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangereous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. T.E. Lawrence
Wotname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 14:35   #15
Registered User
 
Nauticatarcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On Boat
Boat: Nauticat 44
Posts: 218
The best storm tactic is good weather forecasting and avoidance, with modern forecasting techniques and the ability to receive them on board its just about possible to sail around anything, do you go for the fence at the top of the cliff or the ambulance at the bottom
Nauticatarcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Storm Tactics DVD benjiwoodboat Classified Ads 8 08-12-2008 02:13
Sneaky Tactics Greenman The Sailor's Confessional 21 15-11-2008 03:22
Multihull storm tactics? sneuman Multihull Sailboats 167 07-02-2007 09:59
Storm Tactics GordMay The Library 1 17-04-2005 06:54
Heavy-Weather Tactics: GordMay General Sailing Forum 25 28-10-2003 16:44


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 20:51.


Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0
© copyright 2002-2009 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.