Quote:
Originally Posted by MermaidMuse
A case in point is a 2003 study on guggul published in JAMA which then flowed into the popular media with the headlines that guggul is not effective for hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol levels). Subsequent studies that were better designed have since shown guggul to be very effective in improving cholesterol levels.
|
I tried finding
references to any subsequent studies that you indicated, and could not. Do you have links? I assume they are also peer reviewed?
Quote:
The concept of a "standard" dose for all patients is flawed because humans do not come in standard packages. If you give me ten individuals diagnosed with the same allopathic disease , I will show you that there are actually ten different pathologies involved and ten different sets of treatments needed (from an Ayurvedic point of view). There may be some overlap on some of the treatments, but ultimately each individual arrived at their list of similar symptoms in their own unique way and each will need to be rebalanced in their own way.
|
We're going to have to disagree on this. Without standard dosages, one has no idea of the active ingredients strength. If I was to accept your premise, the argument for standard dosages still is valid, as adjustmenst of the amount given can be made, just as it is in allopathic medicine.
You also don't address the issues of contraindications. Certain ailments there just are no effective traditional treatments for. Many patients may have multiple maladies. When allopathic treatments are required, how do you allow for possible contraindications? How do you know?
Quote:
One other area of communication challenge that you and I are having is that I speak of traditional medicine systems that are complete medical systems, that are taught in universities, that include hospitals, including trauma care and surgery, and you refer to these systems as "folk remedies".
|
And do they discuss the issue of many herbal preparations being tinctures that are alchohol based? Do they discuss what that may have on the efficacy of the primary ingredient? How do they know if scientific studies were not done on those preparations?
What soil was the plant raised in? What fertilizer was used? Was it stresseed by too much
water or drought?
All of these effect the strength of any active ingredient. Without standardization, how do you know how much to give someone?
Lastly, tell me, with all the traditional
medical practices out there, how come there is nothing that works with diabetes in a dependable, consistent and expected outcome?