Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 31-12-2013, 17:07   #31
Moderator Emeritus
 
Paul Elliott's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,663
Images: 4
Re: Load Testing Results

I would like to see tests on a Brummel eyesplice in modern single-braid. It seems that even with a good tail bury there would be more strain at the in/out points than there would be with a typical buried splice.
__________________
Paul Elliott, S/V VALIS - Pacific Seacraft 44 #16 - Friday Harbor, WA
www.sailvalis.com
Paul Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-12-2013, 17:26   #32
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

Paul, yes, I plan to do that . . .but there is a nice video test done by a chicago rigger that shows exactly what you suggest - the brummel breaks before the straight bury. They did not have a load cell (at least in the video), so we don't know how much weaker it is.

Back to dacron double braid for a minute - adding New England Ropes Stayset data.

Bowline still statistically equal to Figure 8
NER ropes breaking at lower % of rated strength, but that may be because they are using a different measure of rated strength. I have asked, and I will check with my own "full strength" breaks.
NER ropes appear to have lower stdev (perhaps higher quality consistency?)
The NER line is 2.33x times higher in (retail) price than the Samson LS

Bowline
Samson LS 1/4": 1582lbs, 83% of rated strength, 5% StDev
Samson XLS 1/4": 1582, 71% of rated strength, 3% StDev
New England Ropes StaySet 1/4": 1575lbs, 67% of rated strength, 1% stdev

Figure 8 loop
Samson LS 1/4": 1590lbs, 84% of rated strength, 3% StDev
Samson XLS 1/4": 1590lbs, 69% of rated strength, 2% StDev
New England Ropes StaySet 1/4": 1558lbs of rated strength, 66%, 1% StDev
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-12-2013, 17:44   #33
Registered User
 
StuM's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Moresby,Papua New Guinea
Boat: FP Belize Maestro 43 and OPBs
Posts: 12,891
Re: Load Testing Results

> I think it will be worth looking at the other 'quick' bends like the ashley and zeppelin

I'd be very interested in the zeppelin - it's my preferred bend for most applications.
StuM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-12-2013, 18:03   #34
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Little Compton, RI
Boat: Cape George 31
Posts: 3,016
Re: Load Testing Results

Hi Evans,

I use a sort of soft shackle with wooden toggles on my boat that I'd love to have you test (concerned about the strain on the toggle). If you PM me a mailing address, I'll be happy to mail you one to pull on, and the remnants need not be returned.
Happy New Year,
Ben Zartman
__________________
Ben
zartmancruising.com
Benz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 06:41   #35
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

Benz - Pm sent to you.

Three Amsteel tests first thing this morning, and the bowline is a total FAIL on dyneema singlebraid.

Regular bowline slipped/slide at average 370lbs (15% of break strength)
Double bowline slipped/slid at average 750lbs (30% of break strength)
Double double* bowline slipped/slid at 950 lbs (38% of break strength).

* This is a bowline with two loops around 'the hole' and two loops around the standing part before the end goes in the hole.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 06:52   #36
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

Still amsteel . . . Figure 8 loop does hold, breaks average 44% of line strength (1100lbs in this case) 4% stdev.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 07:23   #37
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

Still on Amsteel - here is a bit of a surprise to me - Buntline hitch - FAIL - all slipped 385lbs, 15% of breaking strength. I first did buntlines on both ends, and the first two both slipped around the same pin end (which has a smoother pin) at around 385lbs. I then tied a firgure 8 around that end and a bunline on the other end and those slipped around 500lbs.

I guess we knew this . . . but you really need to use splices with dyneema!
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 07:49   #38
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

So, for you "knot experts", are there any other loop knots worth testing in the dyneema? Is there a know that is easier to untie than the figure 8 but may not slip like the bowline? Or a knot that is less bulky than the figure 8 but will not slip like the buntline? Or do we just conclude "figure 8 or splice"?
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 08:24   #39
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

Someone suggested the Alpine Butterfly as a no-slip knot for the amsteel..

It did not slip . . . 5 pulls gives an average of 1140lbs (45% of rated strength) statistically equal to the figure 8 (1102lbs, 44%)
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 08:35   #40
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,615
Re: Load Testing Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by estarzinger View Post
Someone suggested the Alpine Butterfly as a no-slip knot for the amsteel..

It did not slip . . . 5 pulls gives an average of 1140lbs (45% of rated strength) statistically equal to the figure 8 (1102lbs, 44%)
Did you test that as an end knot or as a middle knot (this was commonly used back in the day as a middle man knot when climbing on easier ground)? Would a butterfly make any sense as a mid-point knot in a jackline system? Tied small, a biner would glide over it. If the line is large enough, the weakening might be acceptable. Risk of slippage doesn't matter much in this application.

Personally, I like fat jackline I can grab with my hand, but most don't. Hang-up could be irritating; probability depends on the biner and the line.
__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 12:12   #41
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: lakeville ma.
Boat: corbin39
Posts: 150
Re: Load Testing Results

could you try a palomar knot tied to a shackle it works fairly good on spectra fishing line thanks
B-Baysailer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 12:45   #42
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

palomar knot . . . that's a new one to me . . .I will look it up and test it.

Here is a summary chart of the knots. I could not get any of the bends to hold/ not slip on the dyneema single braid, surprised that even the double fisherman slipped. . .will have to try the triple fisherman. There may be some fishing line bends I should try . . .any suggestions?

Click image for larger version

Name:	<a title=rope test.jpg Views: 207 Size: 228.9 KB ID: 73127" style="margin: 2px" />

I have a question into NER about their rated strengths. West marine shows completely different numbers than the NER spec sheets show. I have used the NER numbers, but unlike Samson they do not say exactly what they represent and I would like to understand them a bit better.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 13:21   #43
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Load Testing Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by B-Baysailer View Post
could you try a palomar knot tied to a shackle it works fairly good on spectra fishing line thanks
You have a winner there. Thanks.

In endura12, breaking strength is 1510lbs (54% of rated strength) vs the figure 8 at 1144 (41%). That is a statistically significant gain.

That looks like a good 'replacement' for the buntline in tieing to shackles. It's only limitation is that you do need to be able to take the loop fully around the attachment - works for shackles but not for say installed padeyes.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 13:35   #44
Moderator Emeritus
 
nigel1's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Boat: Beneteau 473
Posts: 5,591
Re: Load Testing Results

Was the Palomar knot easy enough to remove after the load test, or after being loaded up.
How would a halyard hitch compare, I know they are a bugger to remove after being tensioned.
__________________
Nigel
Beneteau 473
Manchester, UK
nigel1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 13:48   #45
Registered User
 
sabray's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wash DC
Boat: PETERSON 44
Posts: 3,165
Re: Load Testing Results

I would love to see heat tests under cyclic loads. The kinds we talk about melting 3 strand.
Having experienced multiple lines fail from chafe or heat that would be cool to see. Guess that most of the failures are from repetitive loading and unloading of the connection points. Single point pulls are good but that is not the primary failure of most lines. Chafe and heat need to be replicated to get a good picture.
sabray is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
loa


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does Anyone Know Westsail Sailboats ? widget55 Liveaboard's Forum 130 13-01-2014 15:12
Dismasting - Why Does it Happen - How to Prevent it ArtM Multihull Sailboats 236 14-01-2013 07:59
A Second Wind for Rocna foggysail Anchoring & Mooring 209 15-12-2011 16:55
My Battery Load Test Results - Advice, Please ? Poozer Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 8 21-07-2011 04:48

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.