Cruisers Forum
 


Join CruisersForum Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-03-2010, 05:34   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamilton, MA
Boat: Cabot 36 - Que Sera
Posts: 22
Holding Tank Configuration Question

I'm in the midst of installing a new holding tank; my plan is to send macerated waste directly to the tank and from there use a manual diaphagm pump to empty the waste when I'm legally able to do so. I'll also have a separate pumpout capability.

My dilemma is that the seacock I'll be using is shared with a sink drain in my head. I want to be sure I'm not going to have fumes from the holding tank discharge coming back into the boat via this route. Originally I was going to use a straightforward Y-valve to bring the two discharge lines together before the seacock, but now I'm wondering if I should install something more specialized for this application. Haven't been able to find such a thing in my online wanderings; any advice would be appreciated.

Chuck
__________________

__________________
chuck g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 06:12   #2
Moderator
 
Pete7's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Solent, England
Boat: Moody 31
Posts: 8,514
Images: 14
Chuck, is the seacock below the waterline? if you pump the waste tank could it end up in the sink as the path of least resistance? The Memsahib will be please with you if that happens

A separate seacock would ensure you only discharge when you want to, not if the pump starts to leak waste overboard.

It is a job I have planned too, but I have two seacocks (sink and shower) next to each other so plan to drill out one for waste and plumb the shower and sink together in the other.

Pete
__________________

__________________
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 07:17   #3
sitting on the dock of the bay

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,513
Images: 6
Send a message via Yahoo to gonesail
your plan sounds the same as what i am doing. head direct into plastic tank with on deck and overboard pump outs ... but i am putting in an electric waste pump. i would say that you need another thru hull for the holding tank. do you have a vented loop?
__________________
sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most.
gonesail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 07:20   #4
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamilton, MA
Boat: Cabot 36 - Que Sera
Posts: 22
In answer to the questions, the seacock is below the waterline and I do indeed plan on a vented loop. I'm not a fan of drilling unnecessary holes below the waterline, so as I ponder this issue, I find myself thinking that perhaps I should just tie in the discharge for the sink in the head to the one for my galley sink... thoughts?
__________________
chuck g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 07:21   #5
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fort Pierce, FL. Texas Roots
Boat: 82 Present, 13 ft dinghy
Posts: 492
Throw out your holding tank, get rid of your existing toilet, put your connecting hose in the dumpster, clean up and list your maserator. After you do that reclaim the holding tank space for other uses. Then put in a natures head and be done.
__________________
'Da Mule
Mule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 08:22   #6
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Out cruising
Boat: Bruckmann 50
Posts: 521
In the setting of direct connection of the head to the holding tank and then a separate connection for the holding tank to the throughhull via a pump (which sounds like what is being talked about) what would a vented loop do and why would you use one? Wouldn't you only open the throughhull when pumping out? Is that not good enough to prevent ingress of water?

Jim
__________________
jkleins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 08:48   #7
sitting on the dock of the bay

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,513
Images: 6
Send a message via Yahoo to gonesail
agree you could do without the loop and just open the thru hull when pumping out .. it would simplify things a lot and avoid the possibility of leaks and odors from the vent. also the manual and electric pumps have joker valves in them.
__________________
sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most.
gonesail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 08:58   #8
Senior Cruiser
 
Sailmonkey's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Boat: '76 Allied Seawind II, 32'
Posts: 5,764
What's wrong with just installing another thru-hull fitting in the boot stripe? That way you don't have another below waterline hole. Cats seldom have head discharges below the water line either.
__________________
Sailmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2010, 18:16   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Ont
Boat: Aragosa 32
Posts: 3
Send a message via Skype™ to peacheykeen
A Y valve to the drain, to serve the sink and the holding tank will work. I did the same configuration, put the manual pump above the water line . The Y valve "seals the sink drain from the tank output hose. Presume that you'll throw the Y valve, pump out the tank and put it back into "sink" postion or the tank may fill with sea water.
__________________
peacheykeen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2010, 19:06   #10
Senior Cruiser
 
Captain Bill's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the boat
Boat: Endeavourcat Sailcat 44
Posts: 2,313
What ever you do do not come directly out of the bottom of the tank into a vertical pipe. Solids from the tank will pack in the pipe and you don't even want to know what you have to do to get them out. In the meantime if your off shore and don't have a pumpout available you'll have a full tank and no way to empty it. I know this from experience.
__________________
Captain Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2010, 19:11   #11
Registered User

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,965
Another option - Use the seacock for the holding tank and install a shower sump to drain the sink at a new bootstripe thru-hull. (I'm assuming that the sink can't gravity drain to a bootstripe thruhull - the best solution)

Pro: Since the head seacock will only be open when you are pumping the holding tank, it is no longer a sinking risk. Since it is only used for the holding tank, it is convenient to wire tie it to make the Coast Guard happy. No vented loop is needed in the line (including between the holding tank and head) since the holding tank has a vent. Should put one in the shower sump line.

Con: Shower sumps are an added complexity and point of failure (although it's an inconvenient rather than dangerous failure). A Whale 800gph shower sump with pump is less than $100. A spare pump and switch for when it breaks is less than $50.

Carl
__________________
CarlF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2010, 19:21   #12
Registered User
 
Jentine's Avatar

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cruising on the hook
Boat: Beneteau 393, "Blackthorn"
Posts: 744
Images: 5
Are you daft man? Do you brush your teeth in the toilet? Why would you want to connect your toilet to the sink where you perform cleaning functions? They must remain separate for sanitary reasons. Plumb the sanitary tank discharge through its own seacock. Since you are so close to the ocean and I assume you normally sail offshore more than three miles, I would recommend that you install a Y valve to direct the waste either to the tank or to directly overboard. It is not reasonable to pump everything into a tank, only to later discharge it overboard.
The pick-up for the overboard discharge pump is an additional line that would be plumbed into the overboard discharge below the Y valve.
__________________
Jim

We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
--Aristotle
Jentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2010, 19:38   #13
Eternal Member
 
Chief Engineer's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North of Baltimore
Boat: Ericson 27 & 18' Herrmann Catboat
Posts: 3,798
Jentines' reply is spot on.

Howie mandel (a noted germophobe) would have a stroke!!!!!

The smell for one....the remnants creeping up the hoses.

I really don't understand why people are such hole-a-phobes,,,,
__________________
Chief Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2010, 06:08   #14
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Out cruising
Boat: Bruckmann 50
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jentine View Post
It is not reasonable to pump everything into a tank, only to later discharge it overboard.
The pick-up for the overboard discharge pump is an additional line that would be plumbed into the overboard discharge below the Y valve.
I disagree. I think it is perfectly reasonable to pump everything into a tank and then out when desired. For several reasons:
1) This allow you to keep the seacock closed at all times except for the minute or two that you are watching it while pumping thus reducing the chance of a hose failure and leak.
2) The urge sometimes occurs when you are closer then 3 miles in and why have to think about changing the Y-valve setting when you really need to go.
3) Y-valves are a source of failure and maintenance.
4) Having the Y-valve does not allow you to eliminate any other part of the system as you still have to have all the others unless you are comfortable using a pump-out all the time for your holding tank.
5) Not having a Y-valve allow the output hose from the toilet to have no connections all the way to the holding tank. This reduces the corresponding points of potential clogging hopefully reducing chances of failure.
6) Having a Y-valve usually means you have to locate it somewhere accessible which can just give you more hose to potentially leak, clog or break.
7) If you have the throughhull open while sailing it is prudent to have a siphon in the system to prevent backflow into the toilet which again just complicates the output hose of the toilet by creating a loop that holds sewage and increases potential smell and clogging.

Just my opinion. There may be other reasonable options but having the simplest system you can design should be included in with them.

Jim
__________________
jkleins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2010, 06:59   #15
sitting on the dock of the bay

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,513
Images: 6
Send a message via Yahoo to gonesail
the other problem with the overboard y-valve is that the law says it needs to be secured. so unless you are offshore for extended periods it could be awkward and maybe difficult to keep up with this. in other words you might just leave it secured all the time .. in that case you may as well pump direct to the holding tank and not worry about it .. like Jim said above.
__________________

__________________
sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most.
gonesail is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
holding tank, plumbing, waste, y-valve

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Converting a Water Tank to a Holding Tank Ray Tarr Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 3 21-02-2010 18:39
Stink from Holding Tank! makolab Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 15 13-02-2010 06:20
Holding Tank Removal Ocean Girl Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 45 25-06-2009 19:22
Holding tank questions Chrisc Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 11 25-04-2007 19:09
Decomisioning Holding tank question Alan Wheeler Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 75 17-02-2007 23:13



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:15.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.