Cruisers Forum
 


Join CruisersForum Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-04-2013, 10:00   #31
cruiser

Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area; Former Annapolis and MA Liveaboard.
Boat: Looking and saving for my next...mid-atlantic coast
Posts: 6,197
Re: Single vs. Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaywalker View Post
...One guy insisted two engines were less reliable because you had twice the chance that one would break...
The probabilities are not causal or additive in the strictest sense.

Airplane Rule

Desert Island Fallacy

Interesting is...

A modern airplane requires only one out of the three (or four) engines to successfully operate during flight. The chance that a well-maintained engine fails is very small. Let the probability of engine failure during a 14 hour flight be 0.5 percent.
P(engine failure during 14 hour flight) = 0.005 What is the probability that an airplane, powered by four engines, will safely fly from Los Angeles to Sydney Australia? Flight time is 14 hours.
The plane will not make it to Sydney if all four engines would fail. The probability of that happening is quite small. Using the multiplication rule we get:
P(all four engines fail) = P(engine1 fails ∩ engine2 fails ∩ engine3 fails ∩ engine4 fails) = P(engine1 fails)P(engine2 fails)P(engine3 fails)P(engine4 fails) = (0.005)4 = [5(10)-3 ]4 = 5(10)-12 = 0.000000000005
4
Compiled by Henry Posters
There are only five combinations of engines working/failing possible.
1. All four engines work, none fails
2. Three engines work, one fails
3. Two engines work, two fail
4. One engine works, three fail
5. All four engines fail
The sum of the probabilities of events one to five is 1. Hence, the probability that at least one engine works is 1 P(all four engines fail) = 1 5(10)-12 = 1 0.000000000005 = 0.999999999995 or 99.9999999995 percent.
The probability that a modern day airplane will safely complete a 14-hour flight is extremely high.

__________________

__________________
SaltyMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 10:25   #32
Registered User
 
SV Maclas's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Boat: Sinek, Pilothouse, 43ft
Posts: 105
Re: Single vs. Twin

We had a friend that installed twin engines on his 50' sailboat. Now that was redundancy.
__________________

__________________
SV Maclas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 11:02   #33
cruiser

Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area; Former Annapolis and MA Liveaboard.
Boat: Looking and saving for my next...mid-atlantic coast
Posts: 6,197
Re: Single vs. Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by SV Maclas View Post
We had a friend that installed twin engines on his 50' sailboat. Now that was redundancy.
Lovely boat!
__________________

__________________
SaltyMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
single

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:00.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.